Pith. Sign in

RECORD

O(\alpha \alpha_s) correction to the pole mass of the t-quark within the Standard Model

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 21 Aug 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We have calculated the O(\alpha \alpha_s) contributions to the relationship between the MS-mass and the pole of the t-quark propagator in the Standard Model in the limit of a diagonal CKM matrix and for a massless b-quark.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0308216 (version 2)
Pith ID7LCLJ4UO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF.Jegerlehner, M.Yu.Kalmykov. "O(\alpha \alpha_s) correction to the pole mass of the t-quark within the Standard Model." arXiv:hep-ph/0308216 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/7LCLJ4UO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,313 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.17 · states limitation 0.89 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We have calculated the O(\alpha \alpha_s) contributions to the relationship between the MS-mass and the pole of the t-quark propagator in the Standard Model in the limit of a diagonal CKM matrix and for a massless b-quark. Analytical results for the so far unknown master-integrals appearing in the calculation are also given.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We have calculated the O(\alpha \alpha_s) contributions to the relationship between the MS-mass and the pole of the t-quark propagator in the Standard Model in the limit of a diagonal CKM matrix and for a massless b-quark. contribution 0.96 0.96 0.75 asserted 1.00
s1 Analytical results for the so far unknown master-integrals appearing in the calculation are also given. result 0.59 0.93 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We have calculated the O(\alpha \alpha_s) contributions to the relationship between the MS-mass and the pole of the t-quark propagator in the Standard Model in the limit of a diagonal CKM matrix and for a massless b-quark. Analytical results for the so far unknown master-integrals appearing in the calculation are also given.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

21 arXiv papers cite this in 32 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 18 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 5 papers
  • The pole masses of the top quark, Higgs particle, and $W,Z$ particles are translated into the input values of the top Yukawa coupling, the Higgs quartic coupling and the weak mixing angle for the RG equations by using the code [ref] , based on the results of [ref] .

    Are Low-energy Data already Hinting at Five Dimensions? · Estimation of Vector-like Fermion Mass and Compactification Scale · 1.00

  • The one-loop matching condition for the quartic coupling has previously been computed in Ref. [ref] and combined with the tool [ref] which performs an OS-conversion and RGE running of all SM parameters incorporating all state-of-the-art higher-order corrections [ref] (see also [ref] , where the OS-conversion formulae for the SM Higgs, top Yukawa, and gauge couplings have been computed at $αα_s$).

    Higgs Mass Predictions in the CP-Violating High-Scale NMSSM · Numerical Validation and Comparison with Previous Works · 0.87

  • To calculate this at the scale $M_t$, we have included the QCD corrections up to three loops [ref] , electroweak corrections up to one-loop [ref] and the $O(αα_s)$ corrections to the matching of top Yukawa and top pole mass [ref] .

    Constraining minimal Type-III Seesaw Model from naturalness, Lepton Flavor Violation and Electroweak Vacuum stability · Vacuum Stability · 0.82

Uses its data or values 3 papers
  • In our analysis, the conversions will be carried out from the pole masses of $t$ [ref] , $τ$, $μ$ and $e$ [ref] to their $MS$ running masses, while the pole masses of $h$ [ref] and $Z$ [ref] have been used to determine the relevant $MS$ running couplings.

    Precise Values of Running Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model · Theoretical framework · 0.92

  • The approximate values of the $𝒪(αα_s)$ and $𝒪(α^2)$ terms follow directly from the results of Refs. [ref] .

    Notes on interplay of the QCD and EW perturbative corrections to the pole-running top-quark mass ratio · Higher-order estimates · 0.98

  • However, as no large logarithms are involved here, and the gauge coupling is already significantly smaller than the strong coupling at the EW scale, we assume these effects as uncertainties in the calculation.] As the starting point for the evolution, we take the following initial values of the SM parameters at the top scale, above the top threshold (i.e. with 6 active flavours) in the $MS$-scheme [ref] [equation] We evolve the couplings using the $β$-functions of the SM up to the LQ scale $m_x$ (with $x=1,1̃, 2,2̃,3$).

    Renormalization Group Evolution with Scalar Leptoquarks · Renormalization Group Evolution and Phenomenological Analysis · 0.91

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.