Pith. Sign in

RECORD

System-size dependence

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Nov 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Strangeness saturation is shown to increase smoothly with the number of participants at AGS, CERN and RHIC energies.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0311020 (version 1)
Pith IDLQB7FA4K, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB. Kaempfer, J. Cleymans, P. Steinberg, S. Wheaton. "System-size dependence." arXiv:hep-ph/0311020 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/LQB7FA4K
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,973 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.77 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.78 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The final state in The final state in heavy-ion collisions has a higher degree of strangeness saturation than the one produced in collisions between elementary particles like p-p or p-$\bar{p}$. A systematic analysis of this phenomenon is made for C-C, Si-Si and Pb-Pb collisions at the CERN SPS collider and for $Au-Au$ collisions at RHIC and at AGS energies. Strangeness saturation is shown to increase smoothly with the number of participants at AGS, CERN and RHIC energies.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The final state in The final state in heavy-ion collisions has a higher degree of strangeness saturation than the one produced in collisions between elementary particles like p-p or p-$\bar{p}$. background 0.80 0.24 0.37 asserted 1.00
s1 A systematic analysis of this phenomenon is made for C-C, Si-Si and Pb-Pb collisions at the CERN SPS collider and for $Au-Au$ collisions at RHIC and at AGS energies. contribution 0.69 0.88 0.06 asserted 0.89
s2 Strangeness saturation is shown to increase smoothly with the number of participants at AGS, CERN and RHIC energies. result 1.00 0.89 0.74 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.92 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.92.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The final state in The final state in heavy-ion collisions has a higher degree of strangeness saturation than the one produced in collisions between elementary particles like p-p or p-$\bar{p}$. A systematic analysis of this phenomenon is made for C-C, Si-Si and Pb-Pb collisions at the CERN SPS collider and for $Au-Au$ collisions at RHIC and at AGS energies. Strangeness saturation is shown to increase smoothly with the number of participants at AGS, CERN and RHIC energies.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.