RECORD
Inflationary attractor property of phantoms
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Nov 2003
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In this paper we will show that the inflationary attractor property still holds for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology, however, it does not hold for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the Randall -Sundrum II cosmology.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
There are some motivations to consider inflation driven by a phantom field. Before entering into some specific models and perform data fitting, it is important first investigating some general features that any viable inflation model should hold. The inflationary attractor property is an important one of those features. In this paper we will show that the inflationary attractor property still holds for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology, however, it does not hold for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the Randall -Sundrum II cosmology.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | There are some motivations to consider inflation driven by a phantom field. | background 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | hedged possibility 0.54 |
| s1 | Before entering into some specific models and perform data fitting, it is important first investigating some general features that any viable inflation model should hold. | background 0.91 | 0.10 | 0.02 | asserted 0.92 |
| s2 | The inflationary attractor property is an important one of those features. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In this paper we will show that the inflationary attractor property still holds for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology, however, it does not hold for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the Randall -Sundrum II cosmology. | result 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.96 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
There are some motivations to consider inflation driven by a phantom field. Before entering into some specific models and perform data fitting, it is important first investigating some general features that any viable inflation model should hold. The inflationary attractor property is an important one of those features. In this paper we will show that the inflationary attractor property still holds for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the standard Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology, however, it does not hold for canonical and Born-Infeld phantom fields in the Randall -Sundrum II cosmology.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
Attracting many attentions, the interesting fluid has been widely discussed recent years [ref] , and Ref. [ref] investigated the thermodynamics on phantom dark energy dominant universe.
Thermodynamics of Spinor Quintom · GSL in a System Filled with Spinor Quintom Matter · 0.92
-
In spite of the fact that the theory of phantom fields encounter the problem of stability, which one could try to bypass by assuming them to be effective fields [ref] ,gib, it is nevertheless interesting to study their cosmological implications and there are many relevant studies recently on phantom energy [ref] .
Quintom Cosmology with General Potentials · Introduction · 0.81
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.