Electrophobic Lorentz invariance violation for neutrinos and the see-saw mechanism

Sandhya Choubey; S.F. King

RECORD

Electrophobic Lorentz invariance violation for neutrinos and the see-saw mechanism

Sandhya Choubey, S.F. King

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 25 Nov 2003

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show how Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) can occur for Majorana neutrinos, without inducing LIV in the charged leptons via radiative corrections.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/0311326 (version 2)

Pith IDJCEF2JEW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationSandhya Choubey, S.F. King. "Electrophobic Lorentz invariance violation for neutrinos and the see-saw mechanism." arXiv:hep-ph/0311326 (2003). https://pith.science/paper/JCEF2JEW

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,321 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.37 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We show how Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) can occur for Majorana neutrinos, without inducing LIV in the charged leptons via radiative corrections. Such ``electrophobic'' LIV is due to the Majorana nature of the LIV operator together with electric charge conservation. Being free from the strong constraints coming from the charged lepton sector, electrophobic LIV can in principle be as large as current neutrino experiments permit. On the other hand electrophobic LIV could be naturally small if it originates from LIV in some singlet ``right-handed neutrino'' sector, and is felt in the physical left-handed neutrinos via a see-saw mechanism. We develop the formalism appropriate to electrophobic LIV for Majorana neutrinos, and discuss experimental constraints at current and future neutrino experiments.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We show how Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) can occur for Majorana neutrinos, without inducing LIV in the charged leptons via radiative corrections.	contribution 0.65	0.92	0.73	asserted 0.99
s1	Such ``electrophobic'' LIV is due to the Majorana nature of the LIV operator together with electric charge conservation.	interpretation 0.75	0.62	0.21	asserted 1.00
s2	Being free from the strong constraints coming from the charged lepton sector, electrophobic LIV can in principle be as large as current neutrino experiments permit.	interpretation 0.87	0.23	0.22	hedged possibility 0.94
s3	On the other hand electrophobic LIV could be naturally small if it originates from LIV in some singlet ``right-handed neutrino'' sector, and is felt in the physical left-handed neutrinos via a see-saw mechanism.	interpretation 0.90	0.13	0.11	hedged possibility 1.00
s4	We develop the formalism appropriate to electrophobic LIV for Majorana neutrinos, and discuss experimental constraints at current and future neutrino experiments.	contribution 0.99	0.93	0.10	asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

We show how Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) can occur for Majorana neutrinos, without inducing LIV in the charged leptons via radiative corrections. Such ``electrophobic'' LIV is due to the Majorana nature of the LIV operator together with electric charge conservation. Being free from the strong constraints coming from the charged lepton sector, electrophobic LIV can in principle be as large as current neutrino experiments permit. On the other hand electrophobic LIV could be naturally small if it originates from LIV in some singlet ``right-handed neutrino'' sector, and is felt in the physical left-handed neutrinos via a see-saw mechanism. We develop the formalism appropriate to electrophobic LIV for Majorana neutrinos, and discuss experimental constraints at current and future neutrino experiments.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

In this talk we show how Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) can occur for Majorana neutrinos, without inducing LIV in the charged leptons via radiative corrections.

Electrophobic Lorentz invariance violation for neutrinos and the see-saw mechanism · 1.00

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 3 papers

For further details of the formalism the reader is referred to [ref] .

Neutrino-antineutrino oscillations as a possible solution for the LSND and MiniBooNE anomalies? · A Model for two generation neutrino-antineutrino mixing · 0.80
For related issues in the original Myers-Pospelov model see, e.g., [ref] — see also [ref] .

Superluminal neutrinos from Lorentz-violating dimension-5 operators · Introduction · 0.93
Among others we will describe effects due to violations of the equivalence principle (VEP) [ref] , non-standard neutrino interactions with matter [ref] , neutrino couplings to space-time torsion fields [ref] , violations of Lorentz invariance (VLI) [ref] and of CPT symmetry [ref] , neutrino decay [ref] , and of non-standard decoherence effects [ref] .

Phenomenology with Massive Neutrinos · Testing New Physics in Atmospheric and LBL $ν$ Oscillations · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.