Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Precise Determination of |V{us}| from Lattice Calculations of Pseudoscalar Decay Constants

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 27 Feb 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Combining the ratio of experimental kaon and pion decay widths, Gamma(K to mu antineutrino{mu} (gamma)) / Gamma(pi to mu \antineutrino (gamma)), with a recent lattice gauge theory calculation of f{K}/f{pi} provides a precise value for the CKM quark mixing matrix element |V{us}|=0.2236(30) or if 3 generation unitarity is assumed |V{us}|=0.2238(30).

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0402299 (version 1)
Pith IDIQCFFQJA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationWilliam J. Marciano. "Precise Determination of |V{us}| from Lattice Calculations of Pseudoscalar Decay Constants." arXiv:hep-ph/0402299 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/IQCFFQJA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,457 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Combining the ratio of experimental kaon and pion decay widths, Gamma(K to mu antineutrino{mu} (gamma)) / Gamma(pi to mu \antineutrino (gamma)), with a recent lattice gauge theory calculation of f{K}/f{pi} provides a precise value for the CKM quark mixing matrix element |V{us}|=0.2236(30) or if 3 generation unitarity is assumed |V{us}|=0.2238(30). Comparison with other determinations of that fundamental parameter, implications, and an outlook for future improvements are given.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Combining the ratio of experimental kaon and pion decay widths, Gamma(K to mu antineutrino{mu} (gamma)) / Gamma(pi to mu \antineutrino (gamma)), with a recent lattice gauge theory calculation of f{K}/f{pi} provides a precise value for the CKM quark mixing matrix element |V{us}|=0.2236(30) or if 3 generation unitarity is assumed |V{us}|=0.2238(30). result 0.99 0.72 0.95 asserted 1.00
s1 Comparison with other determinations of that fundamental parameter, implications, and an outlook for future improvements are given. future work 0.48 0.33 0.03 asserted 0.55

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.40 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.75.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Combining the ratio of experimental kaon and pion decay widths, Gamma(K to mu antineutrino{mu} (gamma)) / Gamma(pi to mu \antineutrino (gamma)), with a recent lattice gauge theory calculation of f{K}/f{pi} provides a precise value for the CKM quark mixing matrix element |V{us}|=0.2236(30) or if 3 generation unitarity is assumed |V{us}|=0.2238(30). Comparison with other determinations of that fundamental parameter, implications, and an outlook for future improvements are given.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

41 arXiv papers cite this in 49 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 35 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 8 papers
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers
  • For example, the ratio of the kaon and pion decay constants, $F_K, F_π$, respectively, may be related to the ratio of light and strange CKM matrix elements $|V_us|, |V_ud|$ via [ref] , [equation] In this expression, $l=e,μ$, the one-loop radiative quantum electrodynamics (QED) correction is $δ_EM$ [ref] and $_̣SU(2)$ is the strong isospin breaking correction that relates $F_K^2/F_π^2$ in the isospin limit to $F_K^+^2/F_π^+^2$ that includes $m_d-m_u$ corrections [ref] [equation]

    $F_K / F_\pi$ from M\"{o}bius domain-wall fermions solved on gradient-flowed HISQ ensembles · Introduction · 0.94

  • The magnitude of the largest off-diagonal element of this matrix, , has historically been measured from three-body kaon () and hyperon decays [ref] . has also been extracted from a comparison of the radiative inclusive rates of two-body kaon () and pion decays, along with lattice-QCD results of the meson decay constants [ref] .

    Measurement of |V_us| using hadronic tau decays from BaBar & Belle · Introduction · 0.93

  • In 2004, Marciano pointed out a window of opportunity for determining $|V_us/V_ud|$ from the ratio of leptonic decay rates $Γ(K→μν̅(γ))/Γ(π→μν̅(γ))$ [ref] .

    Kaon physics: a lattice perspective · $|V_us/V_ud|$ from $K, π→μν̅$ · 0.80

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.