Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Fifty years of Yang-Mills Theories: a phenomenological point of view

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Alvaro De Rujula

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 23 Apr 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Younger addicts may learn that history does not resemble at all what is reflected in current textbooks: it was orders of magnitude more fascinating.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.69 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0404215 (version 4)
Pith IDCIFMPDZZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlvaro De Rujula. "Fifty years of Yang-Mills Theories: a phenomenological point of view." arXiv:hep-ph/0404215 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/CIFMPDZZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,594 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.95 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

On the occasion of the celebration of the first half-century of Yang--Mills theories, I am contributing a personal recollection of how the subject, in its early times, confronted physical reality, that is, its "phenomenology". There is nothing original in this work, except, perhaps, my own points of view. But I hope that the older practitioners of the field will find here grounds for nostalgia, or good reasons to disagree with me. Younger addicts may learn that history does not resemble at all what is reflected in current textbooks: it was orders of magnitude more fascinating.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 On the occasion of the celebration of the first half-century of Yang--Mills theories, I am contributing a personal recollection of how the subject, in its early times, confronted physical reality, that is, its "phenomenology". contribution 0.85 0.25 0.06 asserted 0.85
s1 There is nothing original in this work, except, perhaps, my own points of view. limitation 0.99 0.22 0.06 hedged possibility 0.53
s2 But I hope that the older practitioners of the field will find here grounds for nostalgia, or good reasons to disagree with me. limitation 0.45 0.11 0.04 hedged possibility 0.90
s3 Younger addicts may learn that history does not resemble at all what is reflected in current textbooks: it was orders of magnitude more fascinating. interpretation 0.47 0.10 0.15 hedged possibility 0.69

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.93 · evidence from argument 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

On the occasion of the celebration of the first half-century of Yang--Mills theories, I am contributing a personal recollection of how the subject, in its early times, confronted physical reality, that is, its "phenomenology". There is nothing original in this work, except, perhaps, my own points of view. But I hope that the older practitioners of the field will find here grounds for nostalgia, or good reasons to disagree with me. Younger addicts may learn that history does not resemble at all what is reflected in current textbooks: it was orders of magnitude more fascinating.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.