Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Deep Inelastic Scattering Revisited

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 19 Jul 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The present theoretical accuracy in description of the process is discussed.

how it is stated · unclear 0.76 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0407203 (version 2)
Pith IDCF7UBS4S, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA.B. Arbuzov, D.Yu. Bardin, L.V. Kalinovskaya. "Radiative Corrections to Neutrino Deep Inelastic Scattering Revisited." arXiv:hep-ph/0407203 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/CF7UBS4S
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,651 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.33 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Radiative corrections to neutrino deep inelastic scattering are revisited. One-loop electroweak corrections are re-calculated within the automatic SANC system. Terms with mass singularities are treated including higher order leading logarithmic corrections. Scheme dependence of corrections due to weak interactions is investigated. The results are implemented into the data analysis of the NOMAD experiment. The present theoretical accuracy in description of the process is discussed.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Radiative corrections to neutrino deep inelastic scattering are revisited. contribution 0.76 0.83 0.05 asserted 0.89
s1 One-loop electroweak corrections are re-calculated within the automatic SANC system. method 0.81 0.94 0.05 asserted 1.00
s2 Terms with mass singularities are treated including higher order leading logarithmic corrections. method 0.95 0.86 0.06 asserted 0.99
s3 Scheme dependence of corrections due to weak interactions is investigated. contribution 0.94 0.88 0.06 asserted 0.88
s4 The results are implemented into the data analysis of the NOMAD experiment. contribution 0.55 0.86 0.11 asserted 1.00
s5 The present theoretical accuracy in description of the process is discussed. interpretation 0.76 0.70 0.22 unclear 0.76

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.98 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.78.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Radiative corrections to neutrino deep inelastic scattering are revisited. One-loop electroweak corrections are re-calculated within the automatic SANC system. Terms with mass singularities are treated including higher order leading logarithmic corrections. Scheme dependence of corrections due to weak interactions is investigated. The results are implemented into the data analysis of the NOMAD experiment. The present theoretical accuracy in description of the process is discussed.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

17 arXiv papers cite this in 21 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 12 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Uses its data or values 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.