Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Large electroweak penguin contribution in B -> K pi and pi pi decay modes

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Aug 2004

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim To explain both modes at once, we may need large electroweak penguin contribution with new weak phases and some SU(3) breaking effects by new physics in both QCD and electroweak penguin type processes.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0408090 (version 1)
Pith IDS2SBBEAO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationSatoshi Mishima (Tohoku U.), Tadashi Yoshikawa (Nagoya U.). "Large electroweak penguin contribution in B -> K pi and pi pi decay modes." arXiv:hep-ph/0408090 (2004). https://pith.science/paper/S2SBBEAO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,747 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.78 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.56 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We discuss about a possibility of large electroweak penguin contribution in B -> K pi and pi pi from recent experimental data. The experimental data may be suggesting that there are some discrepancies between the data and theoretical estimation in the branching ratios of them. In B -> K pi decays, to explain it, a large electroweak penguin contribution and large strong phase differences seem to be needed. The contributions should appear also in B -> pi pi. We show, as an example, a solution to solve the discrepancies in both B -> K pi and B -> pi pi. However the magnitude of the parameters and the strong phase estimated from experimental data are quite large compared with the theoretical estimations. It may be suggesting some new physics effects are including in these processes. We will have to discuss about the dependence of the new physics. To explain both modes at once, we may need large electroweak penguin contribution with new weak phases and some SU(3) breaking effects by new physics in both QCD and electroweak penguin type processes.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We discuss about a possibility of large electroweak penguin contribution in B -> K pi and pi pi from recent experimental data. contribution 0.91 0.32 0.16 hedged possibility 0.94
s1 The experimental data may be suggesting that there are some discrepancies between the data and theoretical estimation in the branching ratios of them. background 0.72 0.07 0.05 hedged possibility 1.00
s2 In B -> K pi decays, to explain it, a large electroweak penguin contribution and large strong phase differences seem to be needed. interpretation 0.78 0.12 0.17 hedged possibility 0.51
s3 The contributions should appear also in B -> pi pi. interpretation 0.58 0.10 0.08 asserted 0.84
s4 We show, as an example, a solution to solve the discrepancies in both B -> K pi and B -> pi pi. contribution 0.87 0.86 0.15 asserted 0.99
s5 However the magnitude of the parameters and the strong phase estimated from experimental data are quite large compared with the theoretical estimations. result 0.79 0.55 0.14 asserted 0.99
s6 It may be suggesting some new physics effects are including in these processes. interpretation 1.00 0.17 0.26 hedged possibility 1.00
s7 We will have to discuss about the dependence of the new physics. future work 0.99 0.10 0.05 hedged possibility 0.50
s8 To explain both modes at once, we may need large electroweak penguin contribution with new weak phases and some SU(3) breaking effects by new physics in both QCD and electroweak penguin type processes. interpretation 0.83 0.25 0.70 hedged possibility 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.69 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We discuss about a possibility of large electroweak penguin contribution in B -> K pi and pi pi from recent experimental data. The experimental data may be suggesting that there are some discrepancies between the data and theoretical estimation in the branching ratios of them. In B -> K pi decays, to explain it, a large electroweak penguin contribution and large strong phase differences seem to be needed. The contributions should appear also in B -> pi pi. We show, as an example, a solution to solve the discrepancies in both B -> K pi and B -> pi pi. However the magnitude of the parameters and the strong phase estimated from experimental data are quite large compared with the theoretical estimations. It may be suggesting some new physics effects are including in these processes. We will have to discuss about the dependence of the new physics. To explain both modes at once, we may need large electroweak penguin contribution with new weak phases and some SU(3) breaking effects by new physics in both QCD and electroweak penguin type processes.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper
  • It may be suggesting to need the large electroweak penguin contribution with new weak phases and some SU(3) breaking effects by new physics in both QCD and electroweak penguin type processes.

    Possibility of Large EW Penguin contribution · 0.98

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • Using the parameterisation ([ref]) and neglecting terms which are quadratic in the $r_i$ as well as the annihilation contribution $$ which has only a small real part, one has 6 different ratios which read [ref] R_c^B ≡ 2 (B^-→π^0K^- )/(B^-→π^-K̅^0) ≃ 1 + 2 (+)- 2 (+)cosγ , R_n^B ≡ 1/2 (B̅^0→π^+ K^- )/(B̅^0→π^0K̅^0) ≃ 1 + 2 (+)- 2 (+)cosγ , R_c^K ≡ 2 τ_0/τ_- (B^-→π^0 K^- )/(B̅^0→π^+ K^-) ≃ 1 + 2 ()- 2 ()cosγ , R_n^K ≡ 1/2 τ_0/τ_- (B^-→π^- K̅^0)/(B̅^0→π^0 K̅^0) ≃ 1 + 2 ()- 2 ()cosγ , R_c^π ≡ τ_0/τ_- (B^-→π^- K̅^0 )/(B̅^0→π^+ K^-) ≃ 1 + 2 ()cosγ- 2 (), R_n^π ≡ τ_0/τ_- (B^-→π^0 K^-)/(B̅^0→π^0 K̅^0) ≃ 1- 2 (+2)cosγ + 2 (2+) , where $τ_0$ and $τ_-$ are the lifetimes of the neutral and charged $B$ mesons, respectively.

    B_s -> phi rho^0 and B_s -> phi pi^0 as a handle on isospin-violating New Physics · Isospin-violating observables in B to Pi,K · 0.84

Cites it as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.