Quark-Gluon Antenna Functions from Neutralino Decay

A. Gehrmann--De Ridder; E.W.N. Glover; T. Gehrmann

REVIEW

Quark-Gluon Antenna Functions from Neutralino Decay

A. Gehrmann--De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 Jan 2005 · 28 references

Pith's verdict: A clean methodological demonstration — the Majorana colour-flow argument plus a real NLO pole cancellation — but the antenna functions themselves live in a paper still in preparation, and one NNLO identification is asserted rather than shown.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/0501291 (version 2)

Pith IDRXZNF6OF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA. Gehrmann--De Ridder, E.W.N. Glover, T. Gehrmann. "Quark-Gluon Antenna Functions from Neutralino Decay." arXiv:hep-ph/0501291 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/RXZNF6OF

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing to know up front: this is a short letter that makes one structural point well and then defers the payoff. The point is that the colour-ordered matrix elements of neutralino → gluino + partons carry the two-antenna structure of a quark-gluon antenna, because the Majorana gluino supplies both a quark and an antiquark colour line. That is a genuinely nice observation, and it is the kind of thing that turns antenna construction from inspired guesswork into derivation. Worth reading for that alone if you work in the antenna camp. What is actually done here: the effective Lagrangian (2.1) and its Feynman rules are written down, the tree amplitudes are decomposed into colour-ordered pieces, and the NLO check is real — Eq. 4.13 shows the one-loop, ggg and gqqbar contributions cancelling against the I^(1)_qg operator, which tests the Lagrangian, the colour bookkeeping and the dipole phase-space integration all at once. The NNLO sum (5.10) is then matched to the Catani/Sterman-Tejeda-Yeomans form in (5.11). That is honest, followable work and it hangs together. Soft spots, in order of weight. First, the antenna functions themselves are in reference [28], listed as in preparation. So the paper demonstrates the principle and nothing more; anyone who wants the actual qg antenna functions at NNLO will not find them here. Second, footnote 1: the last term in H^(2)_gluino is identified with the identical-flavour contribution and subtracted. That identification is asserted, not derived, and it is the one link in the NNLO chain a reader cannot check from the text. I would want it shown, or at least argued from the three-gluino final state. Third, on the worry that H^(2)_gluino is read off rather than derived: that is half right and half not. H^(2) is by definition the process-specific constant, so extracting it and comparing its colour pattern against H^(2)_q is the content of the check, not a circularity, and the pattern that comes out is nontrivial. I would rank that concern below footnote 1. The deliberate omission of SUSY QCD corrections is stated plainly and is the right call. Who gets value: people building NNLO subtraction in the antenna framework, and anyone who wants a template for deriving other antenna types from physical matrix elements. Peer review: yes, send it out. It is a competent, candid letter from exactly the right authors, and the checks are the sort a referee can actually follow.

Referee report

Significance

If the construction holds, it closes a genuine gap in the antenna subtraction programme: quark-antiquark antennae come from γ* → qq̄, gluon-gluon antennae from Higgs decay via the effective Lagrangian of Refs. [26, 27], and quark-gluon antennae from neutralino decay, so that all antenna functions at NLO and beyond would have a common physical origin rather than a case-by-case construction. The paper earns credit for the explicitness of its evidence: every Laurent coefficient of every integrated matrix element is written out (Eqs. 4.6, 4.11, 5.1, 5.2, 5.8, 5.9), so the NLO cancellation of Eq. (4.13) and the NNLO pole assembly of Eq. (5.10) are reproducible by the reader without recourse to the authors' code. The NLO check in particular is a non-trivial test of the effective Lagrangian, of the colour bookkeeping of Eqs. (3.1) and (4.1), and of the factor-of-four accounting relative to the γ* → qq̄ case noted below Eq. (3.5). The authors are also careful in the abstract to claim only that the infrared structure 'is shown to agree', which is precisely what the equations demonstrate.

Major objections (3)

[§5, Eq. (5.15) and footnote 1] The process-specific content of the NNLO check is the constant H^(2)_g̃ in Eq. (5.15), and it is obtained by reading off the computed pole structure of Eq. (5.10) rather than derived independently; the decomposition in Eq. (5.11) is therefore partly a reparametrisation, with the genuinely predictive content residing in the pattern of H^(2)_g̃ relative to H^(2)_q. The most fragile sub-step is footnote 1, where the last term of H^(2)_g̃ is identified with final states containing three gluinos and one gluon and is subtracted on the grounds that it belongs to SUSY-QCD rather than QCD. That identification is asserted, not shown. A concrete test would settle it: compute the integrated g̃g̃g̃g contribution explicitly (or isolate it by restricting the four-parton sum to the identical-flavour channel) and verify that it reproduces the quoted term with the quoted colour factor. Absent such a check, the NNLO agreement should be described as a consistency check of the pole structure rather than as a derivation of the antenna function's process-specific constant. This does not affect the NLO result of Eq. (4.13), which is independent of footnote 1.
[Title and §6, versus Eqs. (4.3)–(4.4)] No antenna function is actually written down in the letter; what is exhibited is the integrated infrared pole structure, with the subtraction terms themselves deferred to Ref. [28], listed as 'in preparation'. Since the central claim is that antenna functions 'can be systematically derived', the reader cannot yet verify that the objects so obtained satisfy the defining property of an antenna function, namely that it coincides with the full matrix element in every unresolved limit and is integrable over the appropriate phase space. The gap is easily closed: the NLO quark-gluon antenna function follows directly from Eqs. (4.3) and (4.9) once the colour-factor adjustment discussed below Eq. (4.5) is applied, and exhibiting it explicitly would convert the letter's structural argument into a demonstrated derivation. Failing that, the title should be softened to match the calibrated wording of the abstract.
[§4, Eq. (4.4) and the discussion following it] The mapping from neutralino matrix elements onto QCD antenna functions requires a colour-factor adjustment that is described only in words. The collinear q → qg limit of Eq. (4.4) carries a colour factor N where the colour-ordered QCD matrix element carries N/2, and the g → gg limit is said to be 'split between both antenna functions, as discussed in [6, 17]'. Because the paper's thesis is that the derivation is systematic, the normalisation and splitting prescription should be stated as an explicit formula relating the neutralino matrix elements to the antenna functions, rather than left to a citation and to Ref. [28]. As it stands, 'derived' means 'derived up to a colour-factor-dependent normalisation and a splitting rule', and a reader attempting to reproduce the construction cannot do so from this letter alone.

Minor objections (8)

[Eq. (2.1) and Eq. (2.2)] Both fields in the effective Lagrangian are Majorana, so the Hermitian-conjugate term in Eq. (2.1) is not independent: for Majorana bilinears ψ̄₁σ^{μν}ψ₂ = −ψ̄₂σ^{μν}ψ₁, and the relative factor between the two terms should be stated explicitly. Please confirm that the Feynman rule of Eq. (2.2) is consistent with the convention adopted, since an incorrect factor of two here would propagate into the normalisation T⁰_g̃g of Eq. (3.2) and hence into every antenna function extracted from it.
[Eq. (2.2), first line] The two Feynman rules in Eq. (2.2) are typeset with identical external-leg labels (χ(p), g^a(k₀), g^b(k₁, ε₁, μ)), although the first is the two-point χ̃-g̃-g vertex and the second the three-point χ̃-g̃-g-g vertex. The duplicated labelling makes the equations hard to read and should be corrected.
[Eq. (2.4) and §5] The paper states repeatedly that SUSY-QCD corrections are discarded, but it would help to say explicitly whether the external gluino leg is renormalised on shell and whether the gluino wavefunction renormalisation is included in Z_η, since the latter is itself a SUSY-QCD effect and its omission should be stated at the point where Z_η is introduced rather than only in the conclusions.
[Eq. (3.3)] The truncation inside the braces is not uniform: the N term is retained through ε² with a remainder O(ε³), while the N_F term is written as N_F/(6ε) + O(ε³), skipping the intervening orders. Either state that only the pole terms of the N_F piece are needed here, or give the expansion to a consistent order.
[Eq. (4.3) and Eq. (4.9)] The invariant s₁₃₄ appears without definition. Please state once that s_{ijk} ≡ s_{ij} + s_{ik} + s_{jk}, since the same shorthand recurs in Eqs. (4.4)–(4.5) and in the four-parton expressions.
[§5, Eq. (5.3) and Eq. (5.4)] The statement that the 1/N term in Eq. (5.3) 'does not contribute to the physical scattering amplitude' should be qualified. For a colour-singlet initial state the subleading-colour term does in general contribute to the squared amplitude; what Eq. (5.4) retains is the leading-colour piece. Since the g̃ggg channel then enters the NNLO pole check of Eq. (5.10) only at leading colour, this should be said explicitly so that the reader knows which colour structures the check covers.
[§5, Eq. (5.14)] The notation iH^(2)_q + jH^(2)_g is defined only in the surrounding prose ('involving i quarks and j gluons'). Promoting this to a displayed definition would make Eq. (5.14) self-contained.
[§6, final paragraph] Ref. [26] is cited for the gluon-gluon antenna functions with a preprint number only. Please confirm its publication status at the time of proof, and likewise for Ref. [28], which is listed as 'in preparation' and carries the actual subtraction terms on which the letter's title depends.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Quark-gluon antenna functions, until now assembled by hand from their limiting behaviour, can instead be derived systematically from the colour-ordered matrix elements of a neutralino decaying into a gluino plus partons.

The reading

At next-to-next-to-leading order, QCD predictions for jet observables need subtraction terms that cancel infrared singularities from two partons becoming soft or collinear at once. The standard bookkeeping device is the antenna function: a process-independent object that captures every singular limit of radiation emitted between two colour-connected hard partons. Antenna functions for a hard quark-antiquark pair had a clean derivation, from the matrix elements of a virtual photon decaying to partons. The quark-gluon and gluon-gluon versions did not; they were pieced together by inspecting the limits they had to reproduce, a procedure the authors say cannot plausibly be pushed to higher orders. This paper argues that the quark-gluon case has a physical source too: the decay of a heavy neutralino into a massless gluino and a gluon, described by an effective Lagrangian that couples the neutralino to the QCD field strength.

What carries the argument

The antenna function: a process-independent object that reproduces all soft and collinear limits of unresolved parton emission between two colour-connected hard partons, and is simple enough to integrate analytically over the appropriate phase space. The paper's machinery is the effective Lagrangian $L_{int} = i eta, psi_bar_{gluino}^a sigma^{mu nu} psi_{neutralino} F^a_{mu nu}$, which couples the neutralino to the gluon field strength with an inverse-mass coupling, together with the colour-flow rewriting that turns the gluino into a simultaneous quark and antiquark line. The verification machinery is Catani's infrared singularity operators $I^{(1)}_{qg}$ and their two-loop extensions, which supply the predicted pole structure against which the neutralino matrix elements are checked after integration over dipole and tripole phase space.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quark-gluon antenna functions can be derived rather than constructed, using the colour-ordered matrix elements of neutralino decay into a gluino plus partons. The mechanism is the Majorana nature of the gluino: after the amplitude is contracted with $1/2$-normalised colour generators, the gluino carries both a quark and an antiquark colour line, so the leading-order process contains two colour-connected antennae, one quark-gluon and one antiquark-gluon, exactly the structure required. The authors then check the claim by computing the infrared pole structure of the neutralino matrix elements and comparing it with what is predicted for radiation off a quark-gluon antenna. At NLO, the sum of the three-parton contributions $T^1_{1/2 gluino ggg}$ and $T^1_{1/2 gluino q qbar}$ cancels the poles of the one-loop two-parton rate, and the residue matches $4,Re I^{(1)}_{qg}$ times the tree-level normalisation, with the factor four counting the two antennae. At NNLO, the sum of the one-loop three-parton and tree-level four-parton contributions reproduces the pole structure predicted by the two-loop infrared singularity operators, including the $beta_0$ and $K$ terms and a process-dependent constant $H^{(2)}$ that the authors decompose into colour structures and relate to the known constants of two-loop four-parton matrix elements.

Load-bearing premise

The matching works only after colour factors are adjusted and, at NNLO, after a term in the gluino constant $H^{(2)}$ is identified with the contribution from final states containing two identical-flavour quark-antiquark pairs and subtracted; the paper asserts that identification rather than deriving it, so if it is wrong the NNLO pole agreement does not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Quark-gluon antenna functions at NLO and NNLO can be read off from a single physical process instead of being assembled limit by limit, which removes a bottleneck in extending antenna subtraction to the colour factors left out of the earlier $alpha_s^3 C_F$ calculation of $e^+e^- to 3$ jets.
The same logic closes a gap in a programme: quark-antiquark antennae come from virtual-photon decay, quark-gluon antennae from neutralino decay, and gluon-gluon antennae from Higgs decay through the effective coupling to the gluonic field strength, so every QCD antenna has a physical parent process.
Because the derivation is systematic rather than constructive, it can in principle be continued to higher orders, where the limit-inspection procedure was not expected to survive.
The matrix elements are given for decay kinematics, but the authors note they can be analytically continued to production and scattering kinematics, which is what collider observables with initial-state partons require.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's real structural point is that colour ordering plus a Majorana fermion is a way of manufacturing any desired pair of colour-connected legs from a single external particle; the neutralino is one instance of a general trick, and one could ask which other effective couplings buy which antenna types.
If the derivation holds, antenna subtraction stops being a collection of separately validated objects and becomes a single family indexed by the hard-parton pair, which would make the subtraction terms for a general NNLO process assemblable rather than bespoke.
The agreement is checked at the level of pole coefficients after phase-space integration, not diagram by diagram; a reader wanting independent confidence would look for a direct comparison of the unintegrated colour-ordered amplitudes with the known QCD ones in each singular limit.

Original abstract

The computation of exclusive QCD jet observables at higher orders requires a method for the subtraction of infrared singular configurations arising from multiple radiation of real partons. One commonly used method at next-to-leading order (NLO) is based on the antenna factorization of colour-ordered matrix elements, and uses antenna functions to subtract the real radiation singularities. Up to now, NLO antenna functions could be derived in a systematic manner only for hard quark-antiquark pairs, while the gluon-gluon and quark-gluon antenna functions were constructed from their limiting behaviour. In this paper, we show that antenna functions for hard quark-gluon pairs can be systematically derived from an effective Lagrangian describing heavy neutralino decay. The infrared structure of the colour-ordered neutralino decay matrix elements at NLO and NNLO is shown to agree with the structure observed for parton radiation off a quark-gluon antenna.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,385 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.35 · states limitation 0.13 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.85 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The computation of exclusive QCD jet observables at higher orders requires a method for the subtraction of infrared singular configurations arising from multiple radiation of real partons. One commonly used method at next-to-leading order (NLO) is based on the antenna factorization of colour-ordered matrix elements, and uses antenna functions to subtract the real radiation singularities. Up to now, NLO antenna functions could be derived in a systematic manner only for hard quark-antiquark pairs, while the gluon-gluon and quark-gluon antenna functions were constructed from their limiting behaviour. In this paper, we show that antenna functions for hard quark-gluon pairs can be systematically derived from an effective Lagrangian describing heavy neutralino decay. The infrared structure of the colour-ordered neutralino decay matrix elements at NLO and NNLO is shown to agree with the structure observed for parton radiation off a quark-gluon antenna.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The computation of exclusive QCD jet observables at higher orders requires a method for the subtraction of infrared singular configurations arising from multiple radiation of real partons.	background 1.00	0.05	0.02	asserted 1.00
s1	One commonly used method at next-to-leading order (NLO) is based on the antenna factorization of colour-ordered matrix elements, and uses antenna functions to subtract the real radiation singularities.	background 0.99	0.04	0.03	asserted 0.99
s2	Up to now, NLO antenna functions could be derived in a systematic manner only for hard quark-antiquark pairs, while the gluon-gluon and quark-gluon antenna functions were constructed from their limiting behaviour.	gap 0.99	0.05	0.03	hedged possibility 0.64
s3	In this paper, we show that antenna functions for hard quark-gluon pairs can be systematically derived from an effective Lagrangian describing heavy neutralino decay.	contribution 1.00	0.97	0.88	asserted 1.00
s4	The infrared structure of the colour-ordered neutralino decay matrix elements at NLO and NNLO is shown to agree with the structure observed for parton radiation off a quark-gluon antenna.	result 0.98	0.91	0.28	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.64 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Colour flow contained in tree level decay ˜χ

**Figure 2.** Colour flow contained in the colour ordered amplitude

**Figure 3.** Colour flow contained in the colour ordered amplitudes

Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-ph/0501291 by the authors.

References

Works cited (28)

[28]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, in prepa ration. 13

View on Pith
[13]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phy s. B 682 (2004) 265 [hep-ph/0311276]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[1]

R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics , Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, 1996); 1In neutralino decay, this identical-ﬂavour contribution c orresponds to ﬁnal states with three gluinos and one gluon. B eing a SUSY QCD correction, it is discarded here, and has to be subt racted from H (2)˜g . 10 G. Dissertori, I.G. Knowle...

View on Pith 1996
[2]

S. Moch, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101 [hep-ph/0403192]; A. Vogt, S. Moch and J.A.M. Vermaseren, Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 129 [hep-ph/0404111]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[3]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and A. Ghinculov, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 053007 [hep-ph/0010075]; C. Anastasiou, E.W.N. Glover, C. Oleari and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, N ucl. Phys. B 601 (2001) 318 [hep-ph/0010212]; 601 (2001) 347 [hep-ph/0011094]; 605 (2001) 486 [hep-ph/0101304]; E.W.N. Glover, C. Oleari and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Nucl. Phys. 605 (2001) 467 [hep-ph/0102201...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[4]

F.V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. 100B (1981) 65; K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov, Nucl. Phys. B192 (1981) 159; V.A. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B460 (1999) 397 [hep-ph/9905323]; J.B. Tausk, Phys. Lett. B469 (1999) 225 [hep-ph/9909506]; T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. B 585 (2000) 741 [hep-ph/0004013]; S. Laporta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/01020...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1981
[5]

L.J. Dixon and A. Signer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 811 [hep-ph/9609460]; Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 4031 [hep-ph/9706285]; Z. Nagy and Z. Trocsanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3604 [hep-ph/9707309]; S. Weinzierl and D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 054028 [hep-ph/9901277]; W.B. Kilgore and W.T. Giele, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7183 [hep-ph/9610433]; Z. Nag...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[6]

J. Campbell, M.A. Cullen and E.W.N. Glover, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 245 [hep-ph/9809429]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[7]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 425 (1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]; D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 552 (1999) 319 [hep-ph/9901201]; D.A. Kosower and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 477 [hep-ph/9903515]; Z. Bern, V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 168 [hep-ph/9810409]; Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, W.B. Kilgore and ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[8]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2677 [hep-ph/9302280]; Z. Kunszt, A. Signer and Z. Trocsanyi, Phys. Lett. B 336 (1994) 529 [hep-ph/9405386]; Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 259 [hep-ph/9409393]; E.W.N. Glover and D.J. Miller, Phys. Lett. B 396 (1997) 257 [hep-ph/9609474]; Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[9]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B 517 (1998) 269 [hep-ph/9707224]; J. Campbell and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 264 [hep-ph/9710255]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[10]

S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Phys. Lett. B 446 (1999) 143 [hep-ph/9810389]; Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 287 [hep-ph/9908523]; F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B 313 (1989) 595; V. Del Duca, A. Frizzo and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 211 [hep-ph/9909464]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[11]

D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 116003 [hep-ph/0212097]; S. Weinzierl, JHEP 0303 (2003) 062 [hep-ph/0302180]; W. B. Kilgore, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 031501 [hep-ph/0403128]; M. Grazzini and S. Frixione, hep-ph/0411399

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[12]

G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 116 (2003) 368 [hep-ph/0211144]; C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 076010 [hep-ph/0311311]; T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. B 693 (2004) 134 [hep-ph/0402265]; G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 135 (2004) 290 [hep-ph/0406332]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[14]

C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 032002 [hep-ph/0402280]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[15]

C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, hep-ph/0409088, h ep-ph/0501130

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[16]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Ph ys. B 691 (2004) 195 [hep-ph/0403057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[17]

D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5410 [hep-ph/9710213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[18]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Ph ys. Proc. Suppl. 135 (2004) 97 [hep-ph/0407023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[19]

F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B 294 (1987) 700; M. Mangano, S. Parke and Z. Xu, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988) 653; M. Mangano, Nucl. Phys. B 309 (1988) 461; L.J. Dixon, Proceedings of “Theoretical Advanced Study Institut e in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI ’95): QCD and Beyond”, ed. D. Soper, World Scientiﬁc (Singapore, 1 996), p.539 [hep-ph/9601359]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1987
[20]

V. Del Duca, L.J. Dixon and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B 571 (2000) 51 [hep-ph/9910563]; F. Maltoni, K. Paul, T. Stelzer and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 014026 [hep-ph/0209271]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[21]

H.P. Nilles, Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1; H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rept. 117 (1985) 75

View on Pith 1984
[22]

H.E. Haber and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B 323, 267 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[23]

H. Baer, X. Tata and J. Woodside, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1568

View on Pith 1990
[24]

J. Rosiek, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3464; hep-ph/9511250. 12

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1990
[25]

S. Catani, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]; G. Sterman and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Lett. B 552 (2003) 48 [hep-ph/0210130]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[26]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, hep-ph /0502110

View on Pith
[27]

F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1304; M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 443

View on Pith 1977

Forward citations

Cited by 29 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Antenna Subtraction at NNLO
hep-ph 2005-05 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

A complete antenna-subtraction framework for NNLO e+e- jet calculations, with all colour-ordered antenna functions and integrated forms, and an analytic demonstration that infrared poles cancel for three-jet production.
Fully differential Higgs boson pair production at N$^3$LO with top quark mass effects
hep-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

First fully differential N3LO QCD predictions for gg->hh in the heavy-top limit, with NLO top-mass effects added; heavy-top scale uncertainty shrinks about 3x, to roughly 1-3%.
Phase-space sectors for ordered momentum mappings in local subtraction up to N$^3$LO
hep-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A sector decomposition of phase space assigns ordered momentum mappings to antenna functions without partial fractioning, enabling simpler N3LO infrared subtraction.
Jet production at electron-positron colliders at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD
hep-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

This paper reports the first direct fully differential N3LO QCD calculation of two-jet production in e+e- annihilation, using new antenna subtraction counterterms for triple-unresolved radiation.
Automation of antenna subtraction in colour space: gluonic processes
hep-ph 2022-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The authors recast NNLO antenna subtraction in colour space, deriving real-radiation subtraction terms from virtual infrared poles, and apply the method to gluons-only three-jet production.

Show 24 more citing papers

Towards NNLO+PS Matching with Sector Showers
hep-ph 2021-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A new matching scheme combines NNLO antenna subtraction with the VINCIA sector antenna shower to give fully differential NNLO+PS predictions for two-jet final states in lepton collisions.
Precise predictions for $\mathrm{WH}$+jet production at the LHC
hep-ph 2020-09 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

First NNLO QCD predictions for WH plus jet production at 13 TeV, including top-quark loop effects, yield inclusive cross sections stable at the 1% level.
Higher-Order Corrections to Higgs Boson Amplitudes with Full Quark Mass Dependence in Quantum Chromodynamics
hep-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The thesis computes three-loop and two-loop QCD corrections to Higgs processes with full quark mass dependence, including a new analytic series-expansion treatment of elliptic two-loop master integrals for Higgs-plus-...
The Three-Loop Splitting Functions in QCD: The Helicity-Dependent Case
hep-ph 2014-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The paper presents the first complete set of next-to-next-to-leading-order splitting functions for longitudinally polarized parton densities in perturbative QCD.
Infrared structure of e+e- --> 3 jets at NNLO
hep-ph 2007-10 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A complete NNLO calculation of electron-positron annihilation into three jets, with all infrared singularities subtracted by antenna functions, cancelled analytically, and implemented in an event generator.
Triple real-emission contribution to the zero-jettiness soft function at N3LO in QCD
hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper provides the technical derivation and cross-checks of the triple-real-emission piece of the N3LO zero-jettiness soft function, confirming the result announced in arXiv:2409.11042.
Tree-level splitting amplitudes for a quark into four collinear partons
hep-ph 2019-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper derives the four-parton collinear splitting amplitudes for a quark parent in conventional dimensional regularisation, together with their nested collinear and soft limits.
Isolated photon and photon+jet production at NNLO QCD accuracy
hep-ph 2019-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors present the first NNLO QCD predictions for isolated photon and photon+jet production using a hybrid isolation prescription that approximates the experimental fixed-cone definition, with residual scale unce...
Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N$^3$LL+NNLO
hep-ph 2018-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Matched N3LL+NNLO predictions for Higgs and Drell-Yan transverse-momentum and phi*_eta distributions, fully exclusive in the Born phase space so that arbitrary fiducial cuts can be applied, reach few-percent scale unc...
Precise predictions for the angular coefficients in Z-boson production at the LHC
hep-ph 2017-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Next-to-next-to-leading-order QCD corrections to the Z-boson angular coefficients reduce the theory-data tension, with chi-squared per data point falling from 4.89 to 1.80 for ATLAS and from 1.75 to 1.01 for CMS.
Vincia for Hadron Colliders
hep-ph 2016-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Vincia 2.0 provides a publicly available antenna shower for hadron collisions, with initial-state radiation, smooth ordering, and matrix-element corrections up to four jets, validated against LEP and LHC data.
Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction
hep-ph 2013-01 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The infrared pole structure of NNLO QCD corrections can be written as a sum of integrated dipoles built from antenna functions and mass factorisation kernels, reproducing Catani's one- and two-loop factorisation formulae.
Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: double real radiation for initial-initial configurations with two quark flavours
hep-ph 2010-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors derive the 12 phase-space master integrals and the integrated four-parton initial-initial antenna functions with two quark flavours, a building block for NNLO antenna subtraction in hadron collisions.
Antenna subtraction for gluon scattering at NNLO
hep-ph 2010-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A working antenna subtraction term for the six-gluon double-real contribution to NNLO dijet production, validated numerically in all single and double unresolved limits.
NLO Antenna Subtraction with Massive Fermions
hep-ph 2009-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors derive and integrate the massive final-final antenna functions needed to extend antenna subtraction to next-to-leading order for processes with massive final-state fermions.
The infrared structure of e+ e- --> 3 jets at NNLO reloaded
hep-ph 2009-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A complete, explicit set of antenna subtraction terms, including the soft-gluon terms omitted in an earlier treatment, renders each part of the next-to-next-to-leading-order three-jet calculation individually finite.
Event shapes and jet rates in electron-positron annihilation at NNLO
hep-ph 2009-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper publishes complete next-to-next-to-leading-order perturbative QCD coefficients for six event-shape observables and four jet-rate definitions in electron-positron annihilation, including soft-gluon subtractio...
NNLO corrections to 3-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation
hep-ph 2008-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A missing soft-gluon subtraction term explains why two next-to-next-to-leading-order calculations of three-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation disagree in three colour factors.
A subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: regularization of real-virtual emission
hep-ph 2006-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors construct explicit counterterms that regularize the singly-unresolved limits of one-loop squared matrix elements in NNLO QCD jet cross sections.
A subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: regularization of doubly-real emissions
hep-ph 2006-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper builds explicit subtraction counterterms, with exact phase-space factorization, that regularize the doubly-real emission contribution to NNLO jet cross sections in electron-positron annihilation.
Matching of Singly- and Doubly-Unresolved Limits of Tree-level QCD Squared Matrix Elements
hep-ph 2005-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors construct subtraction terms that regularize tree-level QCD squared matrix elements in all singly- and doubly-unresolved regions without double or triple subtraction.
Single-jet inclusive rates with exact color at $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^4)$
hep-ph 2019-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

An independent exact-color NNLO QCD calculation of single-jet inclusive cross sections at 13 TeV agrees with the existing leading-color results within about one percent, confirming the approximation is adequate for PDF fits.
Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions
hep-ph 2016-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A general local-subtraction method reproduces published NNLO event-shape distributions in electron-positron annihilation and yields the first NNLO prediction for the jet cone energy fraction.
A subtraction scheme for computing QCD jet cross sections at NNLO: integrating the subtraction terms I
hep-ph 2008-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The authors evaluate, as Laurent expansions in the dimensional-regularization parameter, the integrals of all one-parton unresolved subtraction terms needed for NNLO jet cross sections in electron-positron annihilation.

How the literature uses it

48 arXiv papers cite this in 93 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 37 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 5 papers

As mentioned earlier, the original NNLO antenna functions derived in Refs. [ref] do not obey all of these requirements, as they typically violate (some of) these principles.

Idealised Antenna Functions for Higher Order QCD Calculations · Generic Design Principles · contest 0.85
From our explicit calculation, we find that in order to obtain the quoted infrared structure of [ref] , one would need to consider a different leading-colour term for the two-loop matrix element: [equation] to effectively reabsorb the infrared poles which are removed in the three- and four-particle final states.

Radiation from a gluon-gluino colour-singlet dipole at N$^3$LO · Applications in higher-order QCD calculations · contest 0.78
We wish to emphasise again that the original NNLO antenna functions derived in [ref] do not obey these requirements, as they typically violate (some of) these principles, as alluded to above.

A general algorithm to build real-radiation antenna functions for higher-order calculations · Design principles · contest 0.81

Builds on it 2 papers

In this paper, we extended the computation presented in [ref] to higher perturbative order by computing the QCD corrections to the decay of a neutralino to gluinos and partons at $𝒪(α_s^3)$.

Radiation from a gluon-gluino colour-singlet dipole at N$^3$LO · Conclusions · 1.00
We plan to perform an analogous calculation [ref] for the decay of a neutralino into a gluino and a gluon [ref] , which allows for the extraction of quark-gluon antenna functions.

N$^3$LO Antenna Functions for Final-State Radiation · Conclusions and outlook · 0.88

Uses its method or tool 15 papers

In this work, we employ the calculation of Ref. [ref] based on the antenna subtraction formalism [ref] to provide NNLO-accurate QCD predictions for the distributions of the angular coefficients.

Precise predictions for the angular coefficients in Z-boson production at the LHC · Numerical predictions · 0.99
In this work, we follow the strategy of [ref] to extract the quark-gluon antenna functions from the decay of a neutralino into a gluino and a gluon.

Radiation from a gluon-gluino colour-singlet dipole at N$^3$LO · Introduction · 0.98
We will follow the NNLO antenna subtraction method which has been fully developed for the production of massless partons in electron-positron annihilation [ref] , leading to the successful description of the infrared structure of three-jet events at NNLO [ref] and the subsequent numerical calculation of the NNLO corrections to event shape distributions [ref] , the moments of event shapes [ref] and jet rates [ref] .

Real-Virtual corrections for gluon scattering at NNLO · Introduction · 0.84

Compares with it 5 papers

In implementation we specify the subtraction formulas for colour-singlet and colour-singlet+jet processes and provide numerical results for $Z$ and $Z$+jet using $N$-jettiness subtractions in combination with the P2B method, comparing our results to [ref] .

NNLO predictions with nonlocal subtractions and fiducial power corrections in GENEVA · Introduction · 0.98
Similarly, for the three-quark antenna, we find [equation] which is to be compared with $E$ given in Eq. (4.9) of Ref. [ref] which contains terms that do not contribute to the quark-antiquark collinear limit starting at $^0$.

A general algorithm to build real-radiation antenna functions for higher-order calculations · Quark-gluon antennae · 1.00
Similarly, for the three-quark antenna, we find [equation] which is to be compared with $E$ given in Eq. (4.9) of Ref. [ref] , which contains terms that do not contribute to the quark-antiquark collinear limit starting at $^0$.

Idealised Antenna Functions for Higher Order QCD Calculations · Quark-Gluon Antennae · 1.00

Cites it as background 19 papers

It was first proposed for perturbative QCD calculations with massless partons in electron-positron annihilation in Refs. [ref] .

Idealised Antenna Functions for Higher Order QCD Calculations · Introduction to Antenna Subtraction · 0.95
It was first proposed for perturbative QCD calculations with massless partons in electron-positron annihilation in Refs. [ref] .

A general algorithm to build real-radiation antenna functions for higher-order calculations · Introduction · 0.93
In recent years a lot of effort has been devoted to the extension of the subtraction method to the computation of radiative corrections at the NNLO accuracy [ref] .

Subtraction with hadronic initial states at NLO: an NNLO-compatible scheme · Introduction · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [28]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, in prepa ration. 13

View on Pith

[2] [13]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phy s. B 682 (2004) 265 [hep-ph/0311276]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[3] [1]

R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber, QCD and Collider Physics , Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, 1996); 1In neutralino decay, this identical-ﬂavour contribution c orresponds to ﬁnal states with three gluinos and one gluon. B eing a SUSY QCD correction, it is discarded here, and has to be subt racted from H (2)˜g . 10 G. Dissertori, I.G. Knowle...

View on Pith 1996

[4] [2]

S. Moch, J.A.M. Vermaseren and A. Vogt, Nucl. Phys. B 688 (2004) 101 [hep-ph/0403192]; A. Vogt, S. Moch and J.A.M. Vermaseren, Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 129 [hep-ph/0404111]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[5] [3]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and A. Ghinculov, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 053007 [hep-ph/0010075]; C. Anastasiou, E.W.N. Glover, C. Oleari and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, N ucl. Phys. B 601 (2001) 318 [hep-ph/0010212]; 601 (2001) 347 [hep-ph/0011094]; 605 (2001) 486 [hep-ph/0101304]; E.W.N. Glover, C. Oleari and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Nucl. Phys. 605 (2001) 467 [hep-ph/0102201...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[6] [4]

F.V. Tkachov, Phys. Lett. 100B (1981) 65; K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov, Nucl. Phys. B192 (1981) 159; V.A. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B460 (1999) 397 [hep-ph/9905323]; J.B. Tausk, Phys. Lett. B469 (1999) 225 [hep-ph/9909506]; T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. B 585 (2000) 741 [hep-ph/0004013]; S. Laporta, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/01020...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1981

[7] [5]

L.J. Dixon and A. Signer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 811 [hep-ph/9609460]; Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 4031 [hep-ph/9706285]; Z. Nagy and Z. Trocsanyi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3604 [hep-ph/9707309]; S. Weinzierl and D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 054028 [hep-ph/9901277]; W.B. Kilgore and W.T. Giele, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7183 [hep-ph/9610433]; Z. Nag...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[8] [6]

J. Campbell, M.A. Cullen and E.W.N. Glover, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 245 [hep-ph/9809429]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[9] [7]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 425 (1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]; D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 552 (1999) 319 [hep-ph/9901201]; D.A. Kosower and P. Uwer, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 477 [hep-ph/9903515]; Z. Bern, V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998) 168 [hep-ph/9810409]; Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, W.B. Kilgore and ...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[10] [8]

Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2677 [hep-ph/9302280]; Z. Kunszt, A. Signer and Z. Trocsanyi, Phys. Lett. B 336 (1994) 529 [hep-ph/9405386]; Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 437 (1995) 259 [hep-ph/9409393]; E.W.N. Glover and D.J. Miller, Phys. Lett. B 396 (1997) 257 [hep-ph/9609474]; Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[11] [9]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B 517 (1998) 269 [hep-ph/9707224]; J. Campbell and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 264 [hep-ph/9710255]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[12] [10]

S. Catani and M. Grazzini, Phys. Lett. B 446 (1999) 143 [hep-ph/9810389]; Nucl. Phys. B 570 (2000) 287 [hep-ph/9908523]; F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B 313 (1989) 595; V. Del Duca, A. Frizzo and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 211 [hep-ph/9909464]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[13] [11]

D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 116003 [hep-ph/0212097]; S. Weinzierl, JHEP 0303 (2003) 062 [hep-ph/0302180]; W. B. Kilgore, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 031501 [hep-ph/0403128]; M. Grazzini and S. Frixione, hep-ph/0411399

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[14] [12]

G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 116 (2003) 368 [hep-ph/0211144]; C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 076010 [hep-ph/0311311]; T. Binoth and G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. B 693 (2004) 134 [hep-ph/0402265]; G. Heinrich, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 135 (2004) 290 [hep-ph/0406332]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[15] [14]

C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 032002 [hep-ph/0402280]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[16] [15]

C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, hep-ph/0409088, h ep-ph/0501130

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[17] [16]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Ph ys. B 691 (2004) 195 [hep-ph/0403057]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[18] [17]

D.A. Kosower, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5410 [hep-ph/9710213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[19] [18]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Nucl. Ph ys. Proc. Suppl. 135 (2004) 97 [hep-ph/0407023]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[20] [19]

F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Nucl. Phys. B 294 (1987) 700; M. Mangano, S. Parke and Z. Xu, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988) 653; M. Mangano, Nucl. Phys. B 309 (1988) 461; L.J. Dixon, Proceedings of “Theoretical Advanced Study Institut e in Elementary Particle Physics (TASI ’95): QCD and Beyond”, ed. D. Soper, World Scientiﬁc (Singapore, 1 996), p.539 [hep-ph/9601359]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1987

[21] [20]

V. Del Duca, L.J. Dixon and F. Maltoni, Nucl. Phys. B 571 (2000) 51 [hep-ph/9910563]; F. Maltoni, K. Paul, T. Stelzer and S. Willenbrock, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 014026 [hep-ph/0209271]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[22] [21]

H.P. Nilles, Phys. Rept. 110 (1984) 1; H.E. Haber and G.L. Kane, Phys. Rept. 117 (1985) 75

View on Pith 1984

[23] [22]

H.E. Haber and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B 323, 267 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[24] [23]

H. Baer, X. Tata and J. Woodside, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1568

View on Pith 1990

[25] [24]

J. Rosiek, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 3464; hep-ph/9511250. 12

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1990

[26] [25]

S. Catani, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]; G. Sterman and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans, Phys. Lett. B 552 (2003) 48 [hep-ph/0210130]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[27] [26]

A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, hep-ph /0502110

View on Pith

[28] [27]

F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1304; M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 443

View on Pith 1977