Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Implications of neutrino data circa 2005

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 24 Mar 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Adopting the 3 neutrino framework, we present an updated determination of the oscillation parameters.

how it is stated · asserted 0.95 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0503246 (version 1)
Pith ID4OHWWUAQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlessandro Strumia, Francesco Vissani. "Implications of neutrino data circa 2005." arXiv:hep-ph/0503246 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/4OHWWUAQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,900 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Adopting the 3 neutrino framework, we present an updated determination of the oscillation parameters. We perform a global analysis and develope simple arguments that give essentially the same result. We also discuss determinations of solar neutrino fluxes, capabilities of future experiments, tests of CPT, implications for neutrino-less double-beta decay, beta decay, cosmology.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Adopting the 3 neutrino framework, we present an updated determination of the oscillation parameters. contribution 0.97 0.89 0.14 asserted 0.95
s1 We perform a global analysis and develope simple arguments that give essentially the same result. method 0.84 0.94 0.14 asserted 1.00
s2 We also discuss determinations of solar neutrino fluxes, capabilities of future experiments, tests of CPT, implications for neutrino-less double-beta decay, beta decay, cosmology. contribution 0.73 0.54 0.08 asserted 0.76

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.38 · evidence from analysis of existing data 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Adopting the 3 neutrino framework, we present an updated determination of the oscillation parameters. We perform a global analysis and develope simple arguments that give essentially the same result. We also discuss determinations of solar neutrino fluxes, capabilities of future experiments, tests of CPT, implications for neutrino-less double-beta decay, beta decay, cosmology.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.