Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Lepton-number violation and right-handed neutrinos in Higgs-less effective theories

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 28 Apr 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A hierarchy of lepton-number violating effects follows.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0504277 (version 2)
Pith IDDWO2A7AD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJan Stern, Johannes Hirn. "Lepton-number violation and right-handed neutrinos in Higgs-less effective theories." arXiv:hep-ph/0504277 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/DWO2A7AD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,763 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.28 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.17 · compares with prior results 0.32 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Following previous work, we identify a symmetry S_nat that generalizes the concept of custodial symmetry, keeping under control deviations from the Standard Model (SM). To realize S_nat linearly, the space of gauge fields has to be extended. Covariant constraints formulated in terms of spurions reduce S_nat back to SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y. This allows for a covariant introduction of explicit S_nat-breaking parameters. We assume that S_nat is at play in a theory of electroweak symmetry-breaking without a light Higgs particle. We describe some consequences of this assumption, using a non-decoupling effective theory in which the loop expansion procedure is based on both momentum and spurion power counting, as in Chiral Perturbation Theory. A hierarchy of lepton-number violating effects follows. Leading corrections to the SM are non-oblique. The effective theory includes stable light right-handed neutrinos, with an unbroken Z_2 symmetry forbidding neutrino Dirac masses. nu_R contribution to dark matter places bounds on their masses.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Following previous work, we identify a symmetry S_nat that generalizes the concept of custodial symmetry, keeping under control deviations from the Standard Model (SM). contribution 0.91 0.84 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 To realize S_nat linearly, the space of gauge fields has to be extended. method 0.71 0.45 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 Covariant constraints formulated in terms of spurions reduce S_nat back to SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y. method 0.76 0.67 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 This allows for a covariant introduction of explicit S_nat-breaking parameters. method 0.79 0.56 0.06 asserted 0.98
s4 We assume that S_nat is at play in a theory of electroweak symmetry-breaking without a light Higgs particle. contribution 0.50 0.45 0.10 asserted 0.72
s5 We describe some consequences of this assumption, using a non-decoupling effective theory in which the loop expansion procedure is based on both momentum and spurion power counting, as in Chiral Perturbation Theory. method 0.95 0.83 0.08 asserted 0.99
s6 A hierarchy of lepton-number violating effects follows. result 0.98 0.79 0.23 asserted 0.99
s7 Leading corrections to the SM are non-oblique. result 1.00 0.79 0.13 asserted 1.00
s8 The effective theory includes stable light right-handed neutrinos, with an unbroken Z_2 symmetry forbidding neutrino Dirac masses. nu_R contribution to dark matter places bounds on their masses. result 0.83 0.65 0.21 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.74.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Following previous work, we identify a symmetry S_nat that generalizes the concept of custodial symmetry, keeping under control deviations from the Standard Model (SM). To realize S_nat linearly, the space of gauge fields has to be extended. Covariant constraints formulated in terms of spurions reduce S_nat back to SU(2)_L x U(1)_Y. This allows for a covariant introduction of explicit S_nat-breaking parameters. We assume that S_nat is at play in a theory of electroweak symmetry-breaking without a light Higgs particle. We describe some consequences of this assumption, using a non-decoupling effective theory in which the loop expansion procedure is based on both momentum and spurion power counting, as in Chiral Perturbation Theory. A hierarchy of lepton-number violating effects follows. Leading corrections to the SM are non-oblique. The effective theory includes stable light right-handed neutrinos, with an unbroken Z_2 symmetry forbidding neutrino Dirac masses. nu_R contribution to dark matter places bounds on their masses.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 30 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 22 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.