Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Minimal Composite Higgs Model and Electroweak Precision Tests

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Kaustubh Agashe, Roberto Contino

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 12 Oct 2005

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that oblique data can be easily reproduced without a significant amount of tuning in the parameters of the model, while Z->bb imposes a stronger constraint.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0510164 (version 3)
Pith IDWI5ONR3V, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKaustubh Agashe, Roberto Contino. "The Minimal Composite Higgs Model and Electroweak Precision Tests." arXiv:hep-ph/0510164 (2005). https://pith.science/paper/WI5ONR3V
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,897 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.86 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A complete analysis of the electroweak precision observables is performed within a recently proposed minimal composite Higgs model, realized as a 5-dimensional warped compactification. In particular, we compute Z->bb and the one-loop correction to the rho parameter. We find that oblique data can be easily reproduced without a significant amount of tuning in the parameters of the model, while Z->bb imposes a stronger constraint. As a consequence of the latter, some of the new fermionic resonances must have mass around 4 TeV, which corresponds to an electroweak fine tuning of a few percent. Other resonances, such as Z', can be lighter in sizeable portions of the parameter space. We discuss in detail the origin of the Z->bb constraint and we suggest several possible avenues beyond the minimal model for weakening it.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A complete analysis of the electroweak precision observables is performed within a recently proposed minimal composite Higgs model, realized as a 5-dimensional warped compactification. contribution 0.94 0.91 0.05 asserted 0.99
s1 In particular, we compute Z->bb and the one-loop correction to the rho parameter. contribution 0.57 0.95 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 We find that oblique data can be easily reproduced without a significant amount of tuning in the parameters of the model, while Z->bb imposes a stronger constraint. result 0.99 0.96 0.50 asserted 1.00
s3 As a consequence of the latter, some of the new fermionic resonances must have mass around 4 TeV, which corresponds to an electroweak fine tuning of a few percent. result 0.65 0.91 0.36 asserted 0.99
s4 Other resonances, such as Z', can be lighter in sizeable portions of the parameter space. result 0.98 0.77 0.06 asserted 0.59
s5 We discuss in detail the origin of the Z->bb constraint and we suggest several possible avenues beyond the minimal model for weakening it. future work 0.85 0.76 0.08 hedged possibility 0.82

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.73.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A complete analysis of the electroweak precision observables is performed within a recently proposed minimal composite Higgs model, realized as a 5-dimensional warped compactification. In particular, we compute Z->bb and the one-loop correction to the rho parameter. We find that oblique data can be easily reproduced without a significant amount of tuning in the parameters of the model, while Z->bb imposes a stronger constraint. As a consequence of the latter, some of the new fermionic resonances must have mass around 4 TeV, which corresponds to an electroweak fine tuning of a few percent. Other resonances, such as Z', can be lighter in sizeable portions of the parameter space. We discuss in detail the origin of the Z->bb constraint and we suggest several possible avenues beyond the minimal model for weakening it.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How later papers used it

66 later papers cite it

Evidence: substantial. 63 of the citing papers share no author with it, and 5 of those carry a confident label from Pith's citation classifier.

Pith read 13 of the 88 citing sentences, choosing only those whose citation markers point at this paper alone, and wrote the paraphrases from them. The summary, the counts, the evidence level, the links and the quotes come from code; the summary counts the papers listed below. A later paper is listed under a label when Pith's citation classifier gives one of its sentences that label at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), Pith's reading finds that the citing paper itself did it, and a second check confirms the paraphrase against the sentence. This section lists uses only. It does not list criticism or disagreement, so their absence here says nothing about how the paper has been received. Papers that share an author with this one are listed apart, under "By the same authors". A quote is the citing authors' own sentence, shown when their paper's licence is CC BY, CC BY-SA or CC0. JSON

Uses its data or values 1 paper · 1 by the same authors

By the same authors

How the literature uses it

65 arXiv papers cite this in 84 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 44 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
  • We then define the local fine tuning as [ref] t^-1 = max | ∂logϵ/∂loga_i| In this scan we have only included points where EWSB happens with a sufficiently small S parameter and excluded all other points.

    The Flavor of the Composite Pseudo-Goldstone Higgs · Higgs potential · 0.86

Uses its data or values 1 paper
Compares with it 2 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 31 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.