RECORD
Double charm hadrons revisited
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Nov 2005
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim It is conjectured that an additional interaction rescaled from the nucleon--nucleon system and acting between light quarks only, can help in bringing extra, possibly required, binding in tetraquarks.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The dynamics of two heavy quarks inside the same hadron is probed against the double charm baryon results of SELEX. This can be seen as a part of the mechanism to bind tetraquarks with two heavy quarks and two light antiquarks. In the framework of potential models, it is possible to test the role of different effects: relativistic corrections, confinement, hyperfine forces, etc. It is conjectured that an additional interaction rescaled from the nucleon--nucleon system and acting between light quarks only, can help in bringing extra, possibly required, binding in tetraquarks.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The dynamics of two heavy quarks inside the same hadron is probed against the double charm baryon results of SELEX. | contribution 0.60 | 0.32 | 0.07 | asserted 0.97 |
| s1 | This can be seen as a part of the mechanism to bind tetraquarks with two heavy quarks and two light antiquarks. | interpretation 0.91 | 0.16 | 0.12 | hedged possibility 0.71 |
| s2 | In the framework of potential models, it is possible to test the role of different effects: relativistic corrections, confinement, hyperfine forces, etc. | method 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.05 | hedged possibility 0.93 |
| s3 | It is conjectured that an additional interaction rescaled from the nucleon--nucleon system and acting between light quarks only, can help in bringing extra, possibly required, binding in tetraquarks. | interpretation 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.27 | speculative 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The dynamics of two heavy quarks inside the same hadron is probed against the double charm baryon results of SELEX. This can be seen as a part of the mechanism to bind tetraquarks with two heavy quarks and two light antiquarks. In the framework of potential models, it is possible to test the role of different effects: relativistic corrections, confinement, hyperfine forces, etc. It is conjectured that an additional interaction rescaled from the nucleon--nucleon system and acting between light quarks only, can help in bringing extra, possibly required, binding in tetraquarks.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
For the study of doubly-heavy baryons, a number of comprehensive theoretical researches based on relativistic quark models [ref] , the Faddeev method [ref] , quantum chromodynamics (QCD) sum rules [ref] , potential models [ref] and lattice QCD [ref] have predicted their masses spectrum, lifetimes and other prospects serving for the detection of doubly heavy baryons.
Light-Cone Sum Rules Analysis of $\Xi_{QQ^{\prime}q}\to\Sigma_{Q^{\prime}}^{*}$ Weak Decays · Introduction · 0.91
-
The mass spectrum of doubly heavy baryons has been investigated within various theoretical approaches, such as the relativistic quark model [ref] , QCD sum rules [ref] , potential models [ref] , and lattice QCD calculations [ref] , etc.
Light cone QCD sum rules study of the rare radiative $\Xi^{*}_{bb}\to\Xi_b\gamma$ decay · Introduction · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.