RECORD
Heavy quarkonium decays and transitions in the language of effective field theories
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 30 Dec 2005
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Some exact results valid for the magnetic dipole couplings are discussed.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Heavy quarkonium decays and transitions are discussed in the framework of non-relativistic effective field theories. Emphasis is put on the matching procedure in the non-perturbative regime. Some exact results valid for the magnetic dipole couplings are discussed.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Heavy quarkonium decays and transitions are discussed in the framework of non-relativistic effective field theories. | contribution 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.13 | asserted 0.95 |
| s1 | Emphasis is put on the matching procedure in the non-perturbative regime. | method 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.13 | asserted 0.95 |
| s2 | Some exact results valid for the magnetic dipole couplings are discussed. | result 0.80 | 0.58 | 0.11 | asserted 0.97 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Heavy quarkonium decays and transitions are discussed in the framework of non-relativistic effective field theories. Emphasis is put on the matching procedure in the non-perturbative regime. Some exact results valid for the magnetic dipole couplings are discussed.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.