The processes $e^+ e^-\to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of light cone formalism

A.K. Likhoded; A.V. Luchinsky; V.V. Braguta

RECORD

The processes $e^+ e^-\to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of light cone formalism

V.V. Braguta, A.K. Likhoded, A.V. Luchinsky

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Feb 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In comparison with NRQCD the numerical results for the cross sections are in better agreement with experiment.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/0602047 (version 2)

Pith ID276ATD47, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA.K. Likhoded, A.V. Luchinsky, V.V. Braguta. "The processes $e^+ e^-\to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of light cone formalism." arXiv:hep-ph/0602047 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/276ATD47

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,424 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.33 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.13 · compares with prior results 0.96 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

In this paper we have analyzed the production of pair charmonium mesons in the reactions $e^+ e^- \to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, e^+ e^-\to \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at energy $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of the light cone formalism. In comparison with NRQCD the numerical results for the cross sections are in better agreement with experiment.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	In this paper we have analyzed the production of pair charmonium mesons in the reactions $e^+ e^- \to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, e^+ e^-\to \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at energy $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of the light cone formalism.	contribution 1.00	0.95	0.10	asserted 0.99
s1	In comparison with NRQCD the numerical results for the cross sections are in better agreement with experiment.	result 0.78	0.82	0.66	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.84 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.96.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

In this paper we have analyzed the production of pair charmonium mesons in the reactions $e^+ e^- \to J/ \Psi \chi_{c0}, e^+ e^-\to \Psi(2S) \chi_{c0}$ at energy $\sqrt s = 10.6$GeV in the framework of the light cone formalism. In comparison with NRQCD the numerical results for the cross sections are in better agreement with experiment.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Reconciling the light-cone and nonrelativistic QCD approaches to calculating e+ e- -> J/psi + eta_c
hep-ph 2006-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The light-cone and NRQCD descriptions of e+e- to J/psi plus eta_c agree once the order-alpha_s double-counted tail of the light-cone wave function is subtracted and certain renormalization factors are set to unity.
The process $\epem\to J/ \psi X(3940)$ at $\sqrt s = 10.6$ GeV in the framework of light cone formalism
hep-ph 2006-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The light cone formalism predicts sigma(e+e- to J/psi X(3940)) of about 11 +/- 3 fb if X(3940) is the 3^1S0 charmonium state, matching Belle's measured 10.6 +/- 2.5 +/- 2.4 fb.

How the literature uses it

5 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper

For example, in the case of double charmonia production at B-factories Belle and BaBar there is about an order of magnitude difference between LC and NRQCD results and only LC solves the long standing contradiction between theory and experiment [ref]

Charmonia Production in $W\to (c\bar{c}) D_{s}^{(*)}$ Decays · Introduction · 0.96

Cites it as background 2 papers

The first attempts to describe the experimental results obtained at Belle and BaBar collaborations within LC were done in papers [ref] .

Double charmonium production at B-factories within light cone formalism · Introduction · 0.99
There were many attempts to resolve this discrepancy [ref] .

Double charmonium production in exclusive bottomonia decays · Introduction. · 0.99

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.