RECORD
Dark Matter in the Simplest Little Higgs Model
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 22 Feb 2006
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We examine the viability of these two candidates using the standard relic abundance calculation.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We investigate a variation of the Simplest Little Higgs (SLH) model that is invariant under a discrete $\CZ_2$ symmetry. Our motivation for imposing this symmetry is the two dark matter candidates it implies, a scalar $\eta$ and a heavy neutrino. We examine the viability of these two candidates using the standard relic abundance calculation. Direct detection prospects are also discussed.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We investigate a variation of the Simplest Little Higgs (SLH) model that is invariant under a discrete $\CZ_2$ symmetry. | contribution 0.97 | 0.87 | 0.03 | asserted 0.95 |
| s1 | Our motivation for imposing this symmetry is the two dark matter candidates it implies, a scalar $\eta$ and a heavy neutrino. | contribution 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.05 | asserted 0.98 |
| s2 | We examine the viability of these two candidates using the standard relic abundance calculation. | method 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.04 | asserted 0.69 |
| s3 | Direct detection prospects are also discussed. | contribution 0.97 | 0.62 | 0.03 | asserted 0.60 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We investigate a variation of the Simplest Little Higgs (SLH) model that is invariant under a discrete $\CZ_2$ symmetry. Our motivation for imposing this symmetry is the two dark matter candidates it implies, a scalar $\eta$ and a heavy neutrino. We examine the viability of these two candidates using the standard relic abundance calculation. Direct detection prospects are also discussed.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
9 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences
Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 1 paper
-
Different from the littlest Higgs model with $T$-parity, where the LTP is much lighter than the symmetry breaking scale $f$ (around $0.2f$) [ref] , the $B^'$ in our model is only slightly lighter than $f$ (around $0.8f$).
Mini Little Higgs and Dark Matter · Introduction · 0.99
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
Moreover, the coupling of $η$ to other particles in the primordial plasma is usually $f^2$ suppressed which makes it practically impossible to satisfy relic density constraints [ref] .
Dark matter in a Simplest Little Higgs with T-parity model · Simplest Little Higgs with T-parity · 0.97
Cites it as background 5 papers
-
The Simplest Little Higgs with T-parity model [ref] is constructed by enlarging the SM $SU(2)_L ⊗U(1)_Y$ gauge group to $SU(3)_W⊗U(1)_X$ in a minimal way.
Dark matter in a Simplest Little Higgs with T-parity model · Simplest Little Higgs with T-parity · 0.93
-
They are many (see for instance Ref. [ref] and references therein), and each one poses a new content or mechanism that opens up new phenomenological possibilities that can be tested in current, as the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and future colliders.
A Brief Review on WIMPs in 331 Electroweak Gauge Models · Introduction · 0.91
-
From the theoretical side, there are some proposals to explain the CDM in the context of Particle Physics models (see Ref. [ref] and references therein for a review of the subject).
Scalar Bilepton Dark Matter · Introduction · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.