Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Perturbative power Q^2-corrections to the structure function g(1)

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Jul 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We prove that regulating infrared divergencies generates power (~1/(Q^2)^k) corrections to the spin structure function g_1 at small x and large Q^2.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/0607024 (version 2)
Pith IDNV7N6WIZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationB.I. Ermolaev, M. Greco, S.I. Troyan. "Perturbative power Q^2-corrections to the structure function g(1)." arXiv:hep-ph/0607024 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/NV7N6WIZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,176 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.76 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We prove that regulating infrared divergencies generates power (~1/(Q^2)^k) corrections to the spin structure function g_1 at small x and large Q^2. At the same time it leads to the corrections ~(Q^2)^k at small Q^2. We present the explicit series of such terms as well as the formulae for their resummation. These contributions are not included in the standard analysis of the experimental data. We argue that accounting for such terms can sizably change the impact of the other power corrections conventionally attributed to the higher twists.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We prove that regulating infrared divergencies generates power (~1/(Q^2)^k) corrections to the spin structure function g_1 at small x and large Q^2. result 0.93 0.93 0.80 asserted 1.00
s1 At the same time it leads to the corrections ~(Q^2)^k at small Q^2. result 0.99 0.82 0.12 asserted 1.00
s2 We present the explicit series of such terms as well as the formulae for their resummation. contribution 0.88 0.93 0.09 asserted 0.99
s3 These contributions are not included in the standard analysis of the experimental data. gap 0.91 0.13 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 We argue that accounting for such terms can sizably change the impact of the other power corrections conventionally attributed to the higher twists. interpretation 0.99 0.44 0.48 hedged possibility 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We prove that regulating infrared divergencies generates power (~1/(Q^2)^k) corrections to the spin structure function g_1 at small x and large Q^2. At the same time it leads to the corrections ~(Q^2)^k at small Q^2. We present the explicit series of such terms as well as the formulae for their resummation. These contributions are not included in the standard analysis of the experimental data. We argue that accounting for such terms can sizably change the impact of the other power corrections conventionally attributed to the higher twists.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.