Canonical Interpretation of the D_{sJ}(2860) and D_{sJ}(2690)

C.E. Thomas; E.S. Swanson; F.E. Close; Olga Lakhina

RECORD

Canonical Interpretation of the D_{sJ}(2860) and D_{sJ}(2690)

F.E. Close, C.E. Thomas, Olga Lakhina, E.S. Swanson

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 13 Aug 2006

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Good agreement is obtained with the properties of two recently announced $D_s$ mesons identified as $D_{s0}(2860) = c\bar{s}(2P)$ and $D^*_{s}(2690) = c\bar{s}$ as a possible mixture of $(2S;{}^3S_1)$ and $(1D;{}^3D_1)$.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.73 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/0608139 (version 1)

Pith IDJVVH535W, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationC.E. Thomas, E.S. Swanson, F.E. Close, Olga Lakhina. "Canonical Interpretation of the D_{sJ}(2860) and D_{sJ}(2690)." arXiv:hep-ph/0608139 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/JVVH535W

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,052 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.42 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The spectrum and decay properties of radially excited $D_s$ states are examined in a new model. Good agreement is obtained with the properties of two recently announced $D_s$ mesons identified as $D_{s0}(2860) = c\bar{s}(2P)$ and $D^*_{s}(2690) = c\bar{s}$ as a possible mixture of $(2S;{}^3S_1)$ and $(1D;{}^3D_1)$. Searching for these mesons in B decays is advocated due to large predicted branching ratios.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The spectrum and decay properties of radially excited $D_s$ states are examined in a new model.	contribution 0.98	0.85	0.05	asserted 0.91
s1	Good agreement is obtained with the properties of two recently announced $D_s$ mesons identified as $D_{s0}(2860) = c\bar{s}(2P)$ and $D^*_{s}(2690) = c\bar{s}$ as a possible mixture of $(2S;{}^3S_1)$ and $(1D;{}^3D_1)$.	result 0.79	0.80	0.75	hedged possibility 0.73
s2	Searching for these mesons in B decays is advocated due to large predicted branching ratios.	future work 1.00	0.42	0.18	asserted 0.73

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.82.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

The spectrum and decay properties of radially excited $D_s$ states are examined in a new model. Good agreement is obtained with the properties of two recently announced $D_s$ mesons identified as $D_{s0}(2860) = c\bar{s}(2P)$ and $D^*_{s}(2690) = c\bar{s}$ as a possible mixture of $(2S;{}^3S_1)$ and $(1D;{}^3D_1)$. Searching for these mesons in B decays is advocated due to large predicted branching ratios.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

How the literature uses it

11 arXiv papers cite this in 30 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Uses its data or values 2 papers

Taking the mass of the $D_sJ(2^3P_0)$ as $(2.82∼2.84)$ GeV [ref] , the total width and branching ratio fractions between $D_sη$ and $DK$ are [equation]

Strong decays of newly observed $D_{sJ}$ states in a constituent quark model with effective Lagrangians · $D_sJ(2|P'_1⟩_H )$, $D_sJ(2^3P_0)$ and $D_sJ(2^3P_2)$ · 0.96
By fixing the masses of $2^1S_0$ and $2^3S_1$ states as suggested by the quark model [ref] , i.e. $m(D_s(2^1S_0))=2.64$ GeV and $m(D_s(2^3S_1))=2.71$ GeV, we obtain their strong decay widths [equation] which turn out to be narrow.

Strong decays of heavy-light mesons in a chiral quark model · Radially excited $D_s$ mesons · 0.93

Compares with it 1 paper

The above mixing scheme is consistent with Ref. [ref] for the low-mass state while the predicted suppression of the $D^*K$ decay mode is different from that of Ref. [ref] .

Strong decays of newly observed $D_{sJ}$ states in a constituent quark model with effective Lagrangians · $D_sJ(2710)$ · 0.99

Cites it as support 1 paper

Therefore, the observed $D_s1(2710)$ is most likely a mixture of the $D_s(2 ^3S_1)$ and $D_s(1 ^3D_1)$ [ref] .

Implication of BaBar's new data on the $D_{s1}(2710)$ and $D_{sJ}(2860)$ · I. Introduction · 1.00

Cites it as background 7 papers

When the $D_sJ^∗(2860)^+$ meson was discovered by [ref] , only the $DK$ decay mode was detected, which made an assignment as a radially excited scalar $cs̅$ meson plausible [ref] , though other configurations such as a $3^-$ state [ref] could not be excluded.

Comment on "Study of D(sJ) decays to D(*)K in inclusive e(+)e(-) interactions" · Introduction · 0.86
In the pure $S$-wave or $D$-wave $cs̅$ picture, the decay properties of the $D_s1(2710)$ and $D_sJ(2860)$ have been studied for several different quantum numbers using various approaches [ref] .

Implication of BaBar's new data on the $D_{s1}(2710)$ and $D_{sJ}(2860)$ · I. Introduction · 0.80
A series of theoretical work [ref] relevant to $D_s1^*(2710)$ and $D_sJ^*(2860)$ were carried out.

Newly observed D_{sJ}(3040) and the radial excitations of P-wave charmed-strange mesons · Introduction · 0.86

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.