Pith. Sign in

RECORD

SO(10) Grand Unification with a Low-Energy $M_R$

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 25 Nov 1992

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Contrary to commonly held belief, we show that one can obtain a low value for $M_R$, the $SU(2)_R$ breaking scale, in grand unification theories based on $SO(10)$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9211310 (version 1)
Pith ID2O2573MZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationE. Keith, N.G Deshpande, T.G. Rizzo. "SO(10) Grand Unification with a Low-Energy $M_R$." arXiv:hep-ph/9211310 (1992). https://pith.science/paper/2O2573MZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,600 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.25 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.11 · compares with prior results 0.53 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Contrary to commonly held belief, we show that one can obtain a low value for $M_R$, the $SU(2)_R$ breaking scale, in grand unification theories based on $SO(10)$. This possibility emerges in the supersymmetric version of $SO(10)$ with a judicious choice of Higgs content. The unification scale is found to be consistent with the constraint from proton decay. This result is first explicitly demonstrated using the one loop renormalization group equations, and then a full two loop analysis is carried out.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Contrary to commonly held belief, we show that one can obtain a low value for $M_R$, the $SU(2)_R$ breaking scale, in grand unification theories based on $SO(10)$. result 0.84 0.93 0.92 asserted 1.00
s1 This possibility emerges in the supersymmetric version of $SO(10)$ with a judicious choice of Higgs content. method 0.52 0.61 0.10 hedged possibility 0.70
s2 The unification scale is found to be consistent with the constraint from proton decay. result 0.98 0.91 0.15 asserted 0.65
s3 This result is first explicitly demonstrated using the one loop renormalization group equations, and then a full two loop analysis is carried out. method 0.96 0.95 0.05 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.59.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Contrary to commonly held belief, we show that one can obtain a low value for $M_R$, the $SU(2)_R$ breaking scale, in grand unification theories based on $SO(10)$. This possibility emerges in the supersymmetric version of $SO(10)$ with a judicious choice of Higgs content. The unification scale is found to be consistent with the constraint from proton decay. This result is first explicitly demonstrated using the one loop renormalization group equations, and then a full two loop analysis is carried out.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.