Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Radiative Corrections to the Neutral Higgs Spectrum in Supersymmetry with a Gauge Singlet

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 5 Feb 1993

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim An analytic formula for the upper bound on the mass of the lightest neutral Higgs scalar including these corrections is given.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9302224 (version 1)
Pith IDSXTZNMQA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationUlrich Ellwanger. "Radiative Corrections to the Neutral Higgs Spectrum in Supersymmetry with a Gauge Singlet." arXiv:hep-ph/9302224 (1993). https://pith.science/paper/SXTZNMQA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,622 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.40 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.05.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The radiative corrections to the $3\times3$scalar and the $2\times2$ pseudoscalar neutral Higgs boson massmatrices are calculated in the supersymmetric extension of the standard model including a gauge singlet superfield in the effective potential approach. The full $t$ and $b$ quark/squark contributions including the nonlogarithmic terms are taken into account, which are seen to affect the result significantly. An analytic formula for the upper bound on the mass of the lightest neutral Higgs scalar including these corrections is given. (Figure available upon request)

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The radiative corrections to the $3\times3$scalar and the $2\times2$ pseudoscalar neutral Higgs boson massmatrices are calculated in the supersymmetric extension of the standard model including a gauge singlet superfield in the effective potential approach. contribution 0.83 0.92 0.08 asserted 1.00
s1 The full $t$ and $b$ quark/squark contributions including the nonlogarithmic terms are taken into account, which are seen to affect the result significantly. method 0.74 0.87 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 An analytic formula for the upper bound on the mass of the lightest neutral Higgs scalar including these corrections is given. result 0.74 0.94 0.58 asserted 1.00
s3 (Figure available upon request) limitation 0.96 0.05 0.01 unclear 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The radiative corrections to the $3\times3$scalar and the $2\times2$ pseudoscalar neutral Higgs boson massmatrices are calculated in the supersymmetric extension of the standard model including a gauge singlet superfield in the effective potential approach. The full $t$ and $b$ quark/squark contributions including the nonlogarithmic terms are taken into account, which are seen to affect the result significantly. An analytic formula for the upper bound on the mass of the lightest neutral Higgs scalar including these corrections is given. (Figure available upon request)

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

25 arXiv papers cite this in 30 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 17 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • ([ref]) and ([ref]), and checked that our results agree with those available in the literature [ref] .

    Dynamical mu Term in Gauge Mediation · Vacuum Structure and Higgs Boson Masses · 1.00

Cites it as background 11 papers
  • The radiative correction in the NMSSM was calculated in the literature [ref] , and in particular the effect of $λ$ in the loop corrections was discussed in [ref] .

    Relaxing the Higgs mass bound in singlet extensions of the MSSM · Introduction · 0.90

  • [ref] .] After early studies of the NMSSM Higgs sector at the tree level [ref] and partial calculations of the dominant one-loop corrections [ref] , full calculations of the one-loop corrections – for increasingly general versions of the NMSSM and using a variety of renormalization schemes for the NMSSM parameters – were made available in refs.

    Higgs-mass prediction in the NMSSM with heavy BSM particles · Introduction · 0.95

  • The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (NMSSM) [ref] is one of the singlet extension models, and its matter content is the MSSM matter and an additional gauge singlet superfield.

    Aspects of High-Scale Supersymmetry in a Singlet-Extended Model · Domain Wall Problem / Tadpole Problem · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.