Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$\pi \pi$ Scattering and Pion Form Factors

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 23 Mar 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using these phase shifts, the vector and scalar form factors are calculated and shown to be in a good agreement with experimental data.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9403348 (version 1)
Pith IDDSVCZKOI, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationL.Beldjoudi, T.N Truong (CPT Ecole Polytechnique). "$\pi \pi$ Scattering and Pion Form Factors." arXiv:hep-ph/9403348 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/DSVCZKOI
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,953 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.47 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.85 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The S and P wave $\pi \pi$ phase shifts are recalculated in terms of two phenomenological parameters using the one loop CPTh and the elastic unitarity condition. Using these phase shifts, the vector and scalar form factors are calculated and shown to be in a good agreement with experimental data. It is found that the simpler and more phenomenological approach, where the left hand cut contributions to the partial wave amplitude are neglected, yields approximately the same result.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The S and P wave $\pi \pi$ phase shifts are recalculated in terms of two phenomenological parameters using the one loop CPTh and the elastic unitarity condition. method 0.72 0.90 0.12 asserted 1.00
s1 Using these phase shifts, the vector and scalar form factors are calculated and shown to be in a good agreement with experimental data. result 0.99 0.93 0.48 asserted 1.00
s2 It is found that the simpler and more phenomenological approach, where the left hand cut contributions to the partial wave amplitude are neglected, yields approximately the same result. result 0.95 0.91 0.27 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.51.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The S and P wave $\pi \pi$ phase shifts are recalculated in terms of two phenomenological parameters using the one loop CPTh and the elastic unitarity condition. Using these phase shifts, the vector and scalar form factors are calculated and shown to be in a good agreement with experimental data. It is found that the simpler and more phenomenological approach, where the left hand cut contributions to the partial wave amplitude are neglected, yields approximately the same result.

Human review
References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.