Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$K \to \pi\pi\gamma$ decays: a search for novel couplings in kaon decays

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Gino Isidori

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Aug 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim To fulfill this program we compute all the the o($p^4$) loop and counterterm contributions, finding a substantial agreement with the existing calculations and adding some small missing terms in $K_S \to \pi\pi\gamma$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9408219 (version 1)
Pith IDTDUB3ZDQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGiancarlo D'Ambrosio, Gino Isidori. "$K \to \pi\pi\gamma$ decays: a search for novel couplings in kaon decays." arXiv:hep-ph/9408219 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/TDUB3ZDQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,987 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We analyze $K \to \pi\pi\gamma$ decays in the framework of Chiral Perturbation Theory. We study the different Dalitz plot distributions, trying to find regions where o($p^6$) contributions could be more easily detected. To fulfill this program we compute all the the o($p^4$) loop and counterterm contributions, finding a substantial agreement with the existing calculations and adding some small missing terms in $K_S \to \pi\pi\gamma$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We analyze $K \to \pi\pi\gamma$ decays in the framework of Chiral Perturbation Theory. method 0.53 0.91 0.03 asserted 0.93
s1 We study the different Dalitz plot distributions, trying to find regions where o($p^6$) contributions could be more easily detected. contribution 0.70 0.87 0.05 hedged possibility 0.77
s2 To fulfill this program we compute all the the o($p^4$) loop and counterterm contributions, finding a substantial agreement with the existing calculations and adding some small missing terms in $K_S \to \pi\pi\gamma$. result 0.55 0.95 0.24 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.70.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We analyze $K \to \pi\pi\gamma$ decays in the framework of Chiral Perturbation Theory. We study the different Dalitz plot distributions, trying to find regions where o($p^6$) contributions could be more easily detected. To fulfill this program we compute all the the o($p^4$) loop and counterterm contributions, finding a substantial agreement with the existing calculations and adding some small missing terms in $K_S \to \pi\pi\gamma$.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.