RECORD
Heavy Sneutrinos as Dark Matter
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 9 Sep 1994
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We find that the sneutrino relic density is in the cosmologically interesting region $0.1\ltwid\Omega_{\sn}h^2\ltwid 1.0$ for $550\gev\ltwid\msn\ltwid 2300\gev$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We calculate the relic density of very heavy, stable scalar neutrinos in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. We include all two-body final states, as well as the effects of co-annihilation with scalar electrons. We find that the sneutrino relic density is in the cosmologically interesting region $0.1\ltwid\Omega_{\sn}h^2\ltwid 1.0$ for $550\gev\ltwid\msn\ltwid 2300\gev$. For nominal values of the parameters of our galactic halo, recent results from the Heidelberg--Moscow direct detection experiment set an upper limit on $\Omega_{\sn}$ which is lower by a factor ranging from two to ten, depending on $\msn$.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We calculate the relic density of very heavy, stable scalar neutrinos in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. | contribution 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.05 | asserted 0.77 |
| s1 | We include all two-body final states, as well as the effects of co-annihilation with scalar electrons. | method 0.94 | 0.92 | 0.03 | asserted 0.89 |
| s2 | We find that the sneutrino relic density is in the cosmologically interesting region $0.1\ltwid\Omega_{\sn}h^2\ltwid 1.0$ for $550\gev\ltwid\msn\ltwid 2300\gev$. | result 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.71 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | For nominal values of the parameters of our galactic halo, recent results from the Heidelberg--Moscow direct detection experiment set an upper limit on $\Omega_{\sn}$ which is lower by a factor ranging from two to ten, depending on $\msn$. | result 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.20 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We calculate the relic density of very heavy, stable scalar neutrinos in the minimal supersymmetric standard model. We include all two-body final states, as well as the effects of co-annihilation with scalar electrons. We find that the sneutrino relic density is in the cosmologically interesting region $0.1\ltwid\Omega_{\sn}h^2\ltwid 1.0$ for $550\gev\ltwid\msn\ltwid 2300\gev$. For nominal values of the parameters of our galactic halo, recent results from the Heidelberg--Moscow direct detection experiment set an upper limit on $\Omega_{\sn}$ which is lower by a factor ranging from two to ten, depending on $\msn$.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
52 arXiv papers cite this in 63 sentences
Papers citing it · 51 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
Next we define [equation] The total annihilation cross section $σ_12(s)$ is given in terms of $w(s)$ by $σ_12(s) = w(s)/s^1/2p_1(s)$ [Our $w(s)$ is also the same as $w(s)$ in [ref] , which is written as $W/4$ in [ref] .].
Gluino Coannihilation Revisited · Appendix A · 0.87
Cites it as support 5 papers
-
On the premise of explaining both the measured DM density and the muon g-2 anomaly, the DM candidate in the MSSM must be the bino-dominated lightest neutralino [ref] [In the case that the lightest left-handed sneutrino acts as a DM candidate, its interaction with $Z$-boson predicts a much smaller density than its measured value, i.e., $Ωħ^2 ≪0.12$, and meanwhile an unacceptably large DM-nucleon scattering rate [ref] .
Impact of recent measurement of $(g-2)_\mu$, LHC search for supersymmetry, and LZ experiment on Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model · Dark matter (DM) physics in MSSM · 0.98
-
Furthermore the sneutrino annihilation rate is usually too rapid to provide enough DM [ref] .
Supersymmetric Dark Matter candidates in light of constraints from collider and astroparticle observables · Introduction · 0.98
-
This leaves the lightest neutralino as unique WIMP candidate in the MSSM [ref] .
Radiative Corrections to the Neutralino Dark Matter Relic Density - an Effective Coupling Approach · Introduction · 0.97
Cites it as background 5 papers
-
Several candidates for dark matter particles have been proposed, which include Standard Model neutrinos [ref] , Sterile neutrinos [ref] , Axions [ref] , Supersymmetric particles [ref] , dark matter from Little Higgs models [ref] , Kaluza-Klein dark matter [ref] , WIMPZILLAs [ref] , Cryptons [ref] , primordial black holes [ref] , WIMPs [ref] , and super-heavy X-particles [ref] .
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays from decays of Holeums in Galactic Halos · Background · 0.99
-
Several candidates for DM particles have been proposed, which include Standard Model neutrinos [ref] , Sterile neutrinos [ref] , Axions [ref] , Supersymmetric particles [ref] , dark matter from Little Higgs models [ref] , Kaluza-Klein dark matter [ref] , WIMPZILLAs [ref] , Cryptons [ref] , primordial black holes [ref] , WIMPs [ref] , and super-heavy X-particles [ref] .
Quantized Gravitational Radiation from Black Holes and other Macro Holeums in the Low Frequency Domain · Introduction · 0.97
-
Several specific dark matter candidates of this type have been studied extensively in the literature, including sneutrino dark matter [ref] (for recent work see [ref] ) in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), and Kaluza-Klein (KK) neutrino dark matter [ref] in models with a universal extra dimension (UED).
Flavored Dark Matter, and Its Implications for Direct Detection and Colliders · Introduction · 0.95
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.