Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Supersymmetry

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 14 Oct 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally I argue that the measurements of supersymmetry parameters may probe the physics at the Planck scale.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9410285 (version 1)
Pith IDGCOYBY4D, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHitoshi Murayama (LBL). "Supersymmetry." arXiv:hep-ph/9410285 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/GCOYBY4D
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,166 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.14 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

I review phenomenologically interesting aspects of supersymmetry. First I point out that the discovery of the positron can be regarded as a historic analogue to the would-be discovery of supersymmetry. Second I review the recent topics on the unification of the gauge coupling constants, $m_b$--$m_\tau$ relation, proton decay, and baryogenesis. I also briefly discuss the recent proposals to solve the problem of flavor changing neutral currents. Finally I argue that the measurements of supersymmetry parameters may probe the physics at the Planck scale.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 I review phenomenologically interesting aspects of supersymmetry. contribution 0.92 0.56 0.06 asserted 0.62
s1 First I point out that the discovery of the positron can be regarded as a historic analogue to the would-be discovery of supersymmetry. contribution 0.53 0.35 0.03 hedged possibility 0.51
s2 Second I review the recent topics on the unification of the gauge coupling constants, $m_b$--$m_\tau$ relation, proton decay, and baryogenesis. contribution 0.93 0.13 0.05 asserted 0.75
s3 I also briefly discuss the recent proposals to solve the problem of flavor changing neutral currents. contribution 0.95 0.15 0.03 asserted 0.58
s4 Finally I argue that the measurements of supersymmetry parameters may probe the physics at the Planck scale. interpretation 0.85 0.23 0.61 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.69.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

I review phenomenologically interesting aspects of supersymmetry. First I point out that the discovery of the positron can be regarded as a historic analogue to the would-be discovery of supersymmetry. Second I review the recent topics on the unification of the gauge coupling constants, $m_b$--$m_\tau$ relation, proton decay, and baryogenesis. I also briefly discuss the recent proposals to solve the problem of flavor changing neutral currents. Finally I argue that the measurements of supersymmetry parameters may probe the physics at the Planck scale.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.