Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Generalized Chiral Perturbation Theory

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 9 Nov 1994

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this way, experimental tests of the foundations of the standard $\chi$PT become possible.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.67 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9411253 (version 1)
Pith IDU762CEUY, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ. Stern, M. Knecht. "Generalized Chiral Perturbation Theory." arXiv:hep-ph/9411253 (1994). https://pith.science/paper/U762CEUY
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,934 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.45 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The Generalized Chiral Perturbation Theory enlarges the framework of the standard $\chi$PT, relaxing certain assumptions which do not necessarily follow from QCD or from experiment, and which are crucial for the usual formulation of the low energy expansion. In this way, experimental tests of the foundations of the standard $\chi$PT become possible. Emphasis is put on physical aspects rather than on formal developements of G$\chi$PT.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The Generalized Chiral Perturbation Theory enlarges the framework of the standard $\chi$PT, relaxing certain assumptions which do not necessarily follow from QCD or from experiment, and which are crucial for the usual formulation of the low energy expansion. contribution 0.96 0.58 0.29 asserted 1.00
s1 In this way, experimental tests of the foundations of the standard $\chi$PT become possible. interpretation 0.75 0.14 0.19 hedged possibility 0.67
s2 Emphasis is put on physical aspects rather than on formal developements of G$\chi$PT. contribution 0.40 0.54 0.08 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.68 · evidence from argument 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The Generalized Chiral Perturbation Theory enlarges the framework of the standard $\chi$PT, relaxing certain assumptions which do not necessarily follow from QCD or from experiment, and which are crucial for the usual formulation of the low energy expansion. In this way, experimental tests of the foundations of the standard $\chi$PT become possible. Emphasis is put on physical aspects rather than on formal developements of G$\chi$PT.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

8 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 9 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 1 paper
  • Note however that Ref. [ref] retains nonzero chiral condensate whereas we put it to zero exactly as a consequence of the $(_K)_A$ symmetry.] As for the pion mass, [ref] and [ref] imply $m_π∝M$ [ref] , in contradistinction to the conventional picture where $m_π^2∝M$.

    Chiral symmetry breaking with no bilinear condensate revisited · Massive quarks · 0.83

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.