pith. sign in

arxiv: hep-ph/9604431 · v1 · submitted 1996-04-30 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Ambiguities in QED: Renormalons versus Triviality

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords ambiguitiescontributionsnon-perturbativephysicsrenormalonstheorytrivialitybelieved
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We point out that, contrary to what is believed to hold for QCD, renormalons are genuine in QED; i.e. the ambiguities which come with them do not require cancellation by hypothetical non-perturbative contributions. They are just the ambiguities characteristic of any trivial ---and thus effective--- theory. If QED remained an isolated theory up to an energy close to its triviality scale, these ambiguities would surely hint at new physics. This not being so, the renormalon ambiguities in QED lead to no new physics, not even to non-perturbative contributions within QED itself.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.