RECORD
The Singlet Contribution to the Structure Function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ at Small $x$
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Jun 1996
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim They are compared for different assumptions on the non--perturbative input distributions, and the stability of the results against presently unknown subleading contributions is investigated.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The resummation of $O(\alpha_s^{l+1} \ln^{2l} x)$ terms in the evolution equation of the singlet part of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is carried out. The corresponding singlet evolution kernels are calculated explicitely. The leading small-$x$ contribution to the three-loop splitting function matrix is determined in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. Relations are derived for the case of ${\cal N} = 1$ supersymmetric Yang--Mills field theory. Numerical results are presented for the polarized singlet and gluon densities, and the structure functions $g_1^{\, p}(x,Q^2)$ and $g_1^{\, n}(x,Q^2)$. They are compared for different assumptions on the non--perturbative input distributions, and the stability of the results against presently unknown subleading contributions is investigated.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The resummation of $O(\alpha_s^{l+1} \ln^{2l} x)$ terms in the evolution equation of the singlet part of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is carried out. | contribution 0.70 | 0.93 | 0.17 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The corresponding singlet evolution kernels are calculated explicitely. | contribution 0.58 | 0.94 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | The leading small-$x$ contribution to the three-loop splitting function matrix is determined in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. | result 0.79 | 0.93 | 0.20 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Relations are derived for the case of ${\cal N} = 1$ supersymmetric Yang--Mills field theory. | contribution 0.54 | 0.90 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Numerical results are presented for the polarized singlet and gluon densities, and the structure functions $g_1^{\, p}(x,Q^2)$ and $g_1^{\, n}(x,Q^2)$. | result 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.14 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | They are compared for different assumptions on the non--perturbative input distributions, and the stability of the results against presently unknown subleading contributions is investigated. | contribution 0.42 | 0.93 | 0.14 | asserted 0.96 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The resummation of $O(\alpha_s^{l+1} \ln^{2l} x)$ terms in the evolution equation of the singlet part of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is carried out. The corresponding singlet evolution kernels are calculated explicitely. The leading small-$x$ contribution to the three-loop splitting function matrix is determined in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme. Relations are derived for the case of ${\cal N} = 1$ supersymmetric Yang--Mills field theory. Numerical results are presented for the polarized singlet and gluon densities, and the structure functions $g_1^{\, p}(x,Q^2)$ and $g_1^{\, n}(x,Q^2)$. They are compared for different assumptions on the non--perturbative input distributions, and the stability of the results against presently unknown subleading contributions is investigated.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
16 arXiv papers cite this in 33 sentences
Papers citing it · 21 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 4 papers
-
The splitting functions extracted in [ref] also completely agreed with the first three loops predicted by BER [ref] , but all showed minor disagreements beginning at the four-loop level [ref] — the same situation as encountered in the solution of the large-$N_c$ helicity evolution equations [ref] .
Analytic Solution for the Helicity Evolution Equations at Small $x$ and Large $N_c\&N_f$ · Introduction · 0.93
-
These splitting functions completely agree with the results of BER IREE expansion (obtained by applying the large-$N_c & N_f$ limit to Eq. (14) in [ref] ).
Helicity Evolution at Small $x$: Quark to Gluon and Gluon to Quark Transition Operators · Summary of our results up to three loops · 0.96
-
Therefore, the agreement between our evolution and the small-$x$ limit of spin-dependent DGLAP equation in the gluon sector has been verified to three loops, the same order as the IREE of [ref] .
Quark and Gluon Helicity Evolution at Small $x$: Revised and Updated · Cross-check against the spin-dependent DGLAP evolution · 0.90
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
Subleading terms dominate over the leading order effects, cf. [ref] .
The three-loop polarized singlet anomalous dimensions from off-shell operator matrix elements · Comparison to the literature · 0.99
Cites it as background 4 papers
-
We finally consider the small $x$ behaviour of the corrections calculated in the present paper.[For the unpolarized case see [ref] .] The leading order small $x$ resummation for the polarized flavor non–singlet and singlet contributions were studied in [ref] .
$O(\alpha_s^2$) Polarized Heavy Flavor Corrections}to Deep-Inelastic Scattering at $Q^2 \gg m^2$ · Discussion · 0.85
-
It led to helicity phenomenology developed in [ref] .
Helicity Evolution at Small $x$: Revised Asymptotic Results at Large $N_c\& N_f$ · Introduction · 0.88
-
Such analyses based on the BER formalism had been performed in Refs. [ref] , before the LCOT approach was developed.
Gluon Double-Spin Asymmetry in the Longitudinally Polarized $p+p$ Collisions · Introduction · 0.83
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.