Pith. Sign in

RECORD

The Strong Coupling Constants of Excited Positive Parity Heavy Mesons in Light Cone QCD

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
T. M. Aliev (Institute of Physics, Azerbaijanian Academy of Sciences), N. K. Pak, M. Savci (Middle East Technical University)

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 16 Aug 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We calculate the strong coupling constants g_(P^(**)P^(*)\pi), where P^(**)(D^(**), B^(**)) is the 1^+ p-wave state, in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules, and using these values of g_(P^(**)P^(*) pi, we compute the hadronic decay widths for D^(**) -> D^* pi and B^(**) -> B^* pi.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9608351 (version 1)
Pith IDYDG6E2KN, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAzerbaijanian Academy of Sciences), M. Savci (Middle East Technical University), N. K. Pak, T. M. Aliev (Institute of Physics. "The Strong Coupling Constants of Excited Positive Parity Heavy Mesons in Light Cone QCD." arXiv:hep-ph/9608351 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/YDG6E2KN
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,798 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We calculate the strong coupling constants g_(P^(**)P^(*)\pi), where P^(**)(D^(**), B^(**)) is the 1^+ p-wave state, in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules, and using these values of g_(P^(**)P^(*) pi, we compute the hadronic decay widths for D^(**) -> D^* pi and B^(**) -> B^* pi.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We calculate the strong coupling constants g_(P^(**)P^(*)\pi), where P^(**)(D^(**), B^(**)) is the 1^+ p-wave state, in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules, and using these values of g_(P^(**)P^(*) pi, we compute the hadronic decay widths for D^(**) -> D^* pi and B^(**) -> B^* pi. contribution 0.98 0.96 0.48 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.78.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We calculate the strong coupling constants g_(P^(**)P^(*)\pi), where P^(**)(D^(**), B^(**)) is the 1^+ p-wave state, in the framework of the light cone QCD sum rules, and using these values of g_(P^(**)P^(*) pi, we compute the hadronic decay widths for D^(**) -> D^* pi and B^(**) -> B^* pi.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.