Pith. Sign in

RECORD

$R$-parity-Violating Supersymmetric Yukawa Couplings: A Mini-review

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Gautam Bhattacharyya

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 22 Aug 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim I review the bounds on the $R$-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings from the considerations of proton stability, $n$--$\bar{n}$ oscillation, $\nu_e$-Majorana mass, neutrino-less double $\beta$ decay, charged-current universality, $e$--$\mu$--$\tau$ universality, $\nu_\mu$--$e$ scattering, atomic parity violation, $\nu_\mu$ deep-inelastic scattering, $K^{+}$-decays, $\tau$-decays, $D$-decays and from the precision LEP electroweak observables.

how it is stated · asserted 0.88 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9608415 (version 2)
Pith IDGYLPGPVK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGautam Bhattacharyya. "$R$-parity-Violating Supersymmetric Yukawa Couplings: A Mini-review." arXiv:hep-ph/9608415 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/GYLPGPVK
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,185 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

I review the bounds on the $R$-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings from the considerations of proton stability, $n$--$\bar{n}$ oscillation, $\nu_e$-Majorana mass, neutrino-less double $\beta$ decay, charged-current universality, $e$--$\mu$--$\tau$ universality, $\nu_\mu$--$e$ scattering, atomic parity violation, $\nu_\mu$ deep-inelastic scattering, $K^{+}$-decays, $\tau$-decays, $D$-decays and from the precision LEP electroweak observables. I also mention about the sparticle bounds at colliders when the assumption of $R$-parity-conservation is relaxed. Finally, I mention how $R$-parity-violating models have been invoked in an attempt to explain the reported excess in ALEPH 4-jet events.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 I review the bounds on the $R$-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings from the considerations of proton stability, $n$--$\bar{n}$ oscillation, $\nu_e$-Majorana mass, neutrino-less double $\beta$ decay, charged-current universality, $e$--$\mu$--$\tau$ universality, $\nu_\mu$--$e$ scattering, atomic parity violation, $\nu_\mu$ deep-inelastic scattering, $K^{+}$-decays, $\tau$-decays, $D$-decays and from the precision LEP electroweak observables. contribution 0.98 0.17 0.19 asserted 0.88
s1 I also mention about the sparticle bounds at colliders when the assumption of $R$-parity-conservation is relaxed. contribution 0.99 0.23 0.05 asserted 0.70
s2 Finally, I mention how $R$-parity-violating models have been invoked in an attempt to explain the reported excess in ALEPH 4-jet events. contribution 0.63 0.11 0.08 asserted 0.73

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

I review the bounds on the $R$-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings from the considerations of proton stability, $n$--$\bar{n}$ oscillation, $\nu_e$-Majorana mass, neutrino-less double $\beta$ decay, charged-current universality, $e$--$\mu$--$\tau$ universality, $\nu_\mu$--$e$ scattering, atomic parity violation, $\nu_\mu$ deep-inelastic scattering, $K^{+}$-decays, $\tau$-decays, $D$-decays and from the precision LEP electroweak observables. I also mention about the sparticle bounds at colliders when the assumption of $R$-parity-conservation is relaxed. Finally, I mention how $R$-parity-violating models have been invoked in an attempt to explain the reported excess in ALEPH 4-jet events.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

18 arXiv papers cite this in 23 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 12 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.