New Physics in CP Asymmetries and Rare B Decays

D. London; M. Gronau

RECORD

New Physics in CP Asymmetries and Rare B Decays

M. Gronau, D. London

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 23 Aug 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Through a study of such decays, we show that it is possible to partially distinguish the different models of new physics.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.66 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,499 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.34 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.13 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We review and update the effects of physics beyond the standard model on CP asymmetries in B decays. These asymmetries can be significantly altered if there are important new-physics contributions to \bqbqbar mixing. This same new physics will therefore also contribute to rare, flavor-changing B decays. Through a study of such decays, we show that it is possible to partially distinguish the different models of new physics.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We review and update the effects of physics beyond the standard model on CP asymmetries in B decays.	contribution 0.91	0.64	0.07	asserted 0.62
s1	These asymmetries can be significantly altered if there are important new-physics contributions to \bqbqbar mixing.	background 0.92	0.07	0.09	hedged possibility 0.98
s2	This same new physics will therefore also contribute to rare, flavor-changing B decays.	background 0.69	0.08	0.11	asserted 0.93
s3	Through a study of such decays, we show that it is possible to partially distinguish the different models of new physics.	result 0.89	0.91	0.69	hedged possibility 0.66

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from literature 0.58.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

We review and update the effects of physics beyond the standard model on CP asymmetries in B decays. These asymmetries can be significantly altered if there are important new-physics contributions to \bqbqbar mixing. This same new physics will therefore also contribute to rare, flavor-changing B decays. Through a study of such decays, we show that it is possible to partially distinguish the different models of new physics.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers whose main result relates to this one's

Found among the papers closest to this one by title and main claim. Pith's classifier compared each pair's main results and a second model family confirmed the relation; checked against two further families, shown conflicts agreed 118 times in 120 and shown same results 218 times in 239. The quoted sentence is the other paper's main claim.

States the same result 1 paper

We show that different models of physics beyond the SM can be distinguished by combining their effects in CP asymmetries and in rare flavor-changing $B$ decays.

CP Violation in B Decays: The Standard Model and Beyond · 0.94

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.