Pith. Sign in

RECORD

QCD aspects of leptoquark production at HERA

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 2 Apr 1997

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim If a leptoquark is produced at HERA as a narrow resonance, various effects tend to broaden the measurable mass distribution considerably.

how it is stated · asserted 0.76 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9704214 (version 1)
Pith IDQXL36HIV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationC. Friberg, E. Norrbin, T. Sj\"ostrand (Lund University). "QCD aspects of leptoquark production at HERA." arXiv:hep-ph/9704214 (1997). https://pith.science/paper/QXL36HIV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,853 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

If a leptoquark is produced at HERA as a narrow resonance, various effects tend to broaden the measurable mass distribution considerably. These effects are discussed here, with special emphasis on initial- and final-state QCD radiation. A proper understanding is important to assess the significance of data and to devise strategies for better mass reconstruction.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 If a leptoquark is produced at HERA as a narrow resonance, various effects tend to broaden the measurable mass distribution considerably. background 0.96 0.12 0.16 asserted 0.76
s1 These effects are discussed here, with special emphasis on initial- and final-state QCD radiation. contribution 0.95 0.54 0.07 asserted 0.81
s2 A proper understanding is important to assess the significance of data and to devise strategies for better mass reconstruction. interpretation 0.62 0.07 0.17 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.51 · evidence from argument 0.87.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

If a leptoquark is produced at HERA as a narrow resonance, various effects tend to broaden the measurable mass distribution considerably. These effects are discussed here, with special emphasis on initial- and final-state QCD radiation. A proper understanding is important to assess the significance of data and to devise strategies for better mass reconstruction.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.