RECORD
Minimal Supersymmetric Left-Right Model
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Jul 1997
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The scale of parity breakdown is predicted in the intermediate region: $M_R > 10^{10}- 10^{11} GeV$, and R-parity remains exact.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We construct the truly minimal left-right symmetric model by utilizing only the fields dictated by supersymmetry and automatic R-parity conservation. Allowing for non-renormalizable operators in the superpotential, we show that parity can be spontaneously broken while preserving electromagnetic gauge invariance. The scale of parity breakdown is predicted in the intermediate region: $M_R > 10^{10}- 10^{11} GeV$, and R-parity remains exact. The theory contains a number of charged and doubly charged Higgs scalars with a low mass of order $M_R^2/M_{Planck}$, accessible to experiment.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We construct the truly minimal left-right symmetric model by utilizing only the fields dictated by supersymmetry and automatic R-parity conservation. | contribution 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.18 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Allowing for non-renormalizable operators in the superpotential, we show that parity can be spontaneously broken while preserving electromagnetic gauge invariance. | result 0.47 | 0.93 | 0.15 | asserted 0.99 |
| s2 | The scale of parity breakdown is predicted in the intermediate region: $M_R > 10^{10}- 10^{11} GeV$, and R-parity remains exact. | result 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.46 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The theory contains a number of charged and doubly charged Higgs scalars with a low mass of order $M_R^2/M_{Planck}$, accessible to experiment. | result 0.96 | 0.84 | 0.17 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We construct the truly minimal left-right symmetric model by utilizing only the fields dictated by supersymmetry and automatic R-parity conservation. Allowing for non-renormalizable operators in the superpotential, we show that parity can be spontaneously broken while preserving electromagnetic gauge invariance. The scale of parity breakdown is predicted in the intermediate region: $M_R > 10^{10}- 10^{11} GeV$, and R-parity remains exact. The theory contains a number of charged and doubly charged Higgs scalars with a low mass of order $M_R^2/M_{Planck}$, accessible to experiment.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
20 arXiv papers cite this in 27 sentences
Papers citing it · 21 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 6 papers
-
Regarding the fermion content of the model, it is the same as its counterpart in the conventional left-right models [ref] .
Investigating $R_D$ and $R_{D^*}$ anomalies in a Left-Right model with an Inverse Seesaw · Left-Right Model with inverse seesaw (LRIS) · 0.96
-
Previous studies of dark matter in left-right symmetric models have largely focused on either SUSY inspired scenarios [ref] or “pure states" consisting of additional electroweak multiplets with a single Majorana mass [ref] .
The Diphoton and Diboson Excesses in a Left-Right Symmetric Theory of Dark Matter · The Model · 0.98
-
LRSUSY models have been explored before [ref] .
Reconciling collider signals, dark matter, and the muon anomalous magnetic moment in the supersymmetric $ U(1)_{R}\times U(1)_{B-L}$ model · Model Description · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.