Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Extraction of the D^*D\pi coupling from D^* decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 3 Mar 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim (The experimental limit \Gamma_{D^{*+}} < 0.13 MeV excludes the $g=0.76$ solution.) Predictions for the D^* and B^* widths are given.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9803227 (version 2)
Pith IDTAOTIA4Z, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationIain W. Stewart (Caltech). "Extraction of the D^*D\pi coupling from D^* decays." arXiv:hep-ph/9803227 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/TAOTIA4Z
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,048 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.76 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.16 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The decays D^* -> D\pi and D^* -> D\gamma are well described by heavy meson chiral perturbation theory. With the recent measurement of Br(D^{*+} -> D^+ \gamma), the D^{*0}, D^{*+}, and D_s^* branching fractions can be used to extract the D^*D\pi and D^*D\gamma couplings $g$ and $\beta$. The D^* -> D\gamma decays receive important corrections at order $\sqrt{m_q}$ and, from the heavy quark magnetic moment, at order $1/m_c$. Here all the decay rates are computed to one-loop, to first order in $m_q$ and $1/m_c$, including the effect of heavy meson mass splittings, and the counterterms at order $m_q$. A fit to the experimental data gives two possible solutions, g=0.27^{+.04}_{-.02}^{+.05}_{-.02}, \beta=0.85^{+.2}_{-.1}^{+.3}_{-.1} GeV^{-1} or g=0.76^{+.03}_{-.03}^{+.2}_{-.1}, \beta=4.90^{+.3}_{-.3}^{+5.0}_{-.7} GeV^{-1}. The first errors are experimental, while the second are estimates of the uncertainty induced by the counterterms. (The experimental limit \Gamma_{D^{*+}} < 0.13 MeV excludes the $g=0.76$ solution.) Predictions for the D^* and B^* widths are given.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The decays D^* -> D\pi and D^* -> D\gamma are well described by heavy meson chiral perturbation theory. background 1.00 0.09 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 With the recent measurement of Br(D^{*+} -> D^+ \gamma), the D^{*0}, D^{*+}, and D_s^* branching fractions can be used to extract the D^*D\pi and D^*D\gamma couplings $g$ and $\beta$. contribution 0.47 0.25 0.24 asserted 0.77
s2 The D^* -> D\gamma decays receive important corrections at order $\sqrt{m_q}$ and, from the heavy quark magnetic moment, at order $1/m_c$. background 0.89 0.13 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 Here all the decay rates are computed to one-loop, to first order in $m_q$ and $1/m_c$, including the effect of heavy meson mass splittings, and the counterterms at order $m_q$. method 0.90 0.93 0.05 asserted 1.00
s4 A fit to the experimental data gives two possible solutions, g=0.27^{+.04}_{-.02}^{+.05}_{-.02}, \beta=0.85^{+.2}_{-.1}^{+.3}_{-.1} GeV^{-1} or g=0.76^{+.03}_{-.03}^{+.2}_{-.1}, \beta=4.90^{+.3}_{-.3}^{+5.0}_{-.7} GeV^{-1}. result 1.00 0.91 0.65 asserted 0.94
s5 The first errors are experimental, while the second are estimates of the uncertainty induced by the counterterms. interpretation 0.76 0.65 0.06 asserted 1.00
s6 (The experimental limit \Gamma_{D^{*+}} < 0.13 MeV excludes the $g=0.76$ solution.) Predictions for the D^* and B^* widths are given. result 0.65 0.70 0.40 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The decays D^* -> D\pi and D^* -> D\gamma are well described by heavy meson chiral perturbation theory. With the recent measurement of Br(D^{*+} -> D^+ \gamma), the D^{*0}, D^{*+}, and D_s^* branching fractions can be used to extract the D^*D\pi and D^*D\gamma couplings $g$ and $\beta$. The D^* -> D\gamma decays receive important corrections at order $\sqrt{m_q}$ and, from the heavy quark magnetic moment, at order $1/m_c$. Here all the decay rates are computed to one-loop, to first order in $m_q$ and $1/m_c$, including the effect of heavy meson mass splittings, and the counterterms at order $m_q$. A fit to the experimental data gives two possible solutions, g=0.27^{+.04}_{-.02}^{+.05}_{-.02}, \beta=0.85^{+.2}_{-.1}^{+.3}_{-.1} GeV^{-1} or g=0.76^{+.03}_{-.03}^{+.2}_{-.1}, \beta=4.90^{+.3}_{-.3}^{+5.0}_{-.7} GeV^{-1}. The first errors are experimental, while the second are estimates of the uncertainty induced by the counterterms. (The experimental limit \Gamma_{D^{*+}} < 0.13 MeV excludes the $g=0.76$ solution.) Predictions for the D^* and B^* widths are given.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

19 arXiv papers cite this in 31 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 18 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 6 papers
  • The relevant formula, derived in HMChPT, reads [ref] g_c(m_π^2) = g_c^(0)[ 1 - 4 (g_c^(0))^2 (4 πf r_0)^2 (m_πr_0)^2 log(m_πr_0)^2 + c_gr_0^2 (m_πr_0)^2 ] , with the particularly interesting parameter $g_c^(0)$ which appears in all the HMChPT formulas that are being used to guide the chiral extrapolations of the phenomenologically interesting quantities in charm physics computed on the lattice.

    D*-->Dpi and D*-->Dgamma decays: Axial coupling and Magnetic moment of D* meson · Towards the physical results · 0.90

  • The effective Lagrangians describing the coupling between charmed mesons and photons, as well as the contact interactions among charmed mesons, are given by [ref] [equation] where the pseudoscalar (vector) charmed mesons $D^(*)=(D^(*)0,D^(*)+)$, $D̅^(*)$ represents anticharmed mesons, $δ=m_D^*-m_D$, and the magnetic field $ℬ^k=ϵ^ijk ∂^i A^j$.

    Radiative decays of $X(3872)$ within $D{\bar D}^*$ molecular framework · Effective Lagrangians · 0.80

  • The low momentum interaction effective theory Lagrangian at leading order is written as [ref] [equation] where $V_a b^μ=1/2(ξ^† ∂^μ ξ+ξ∂^μ ξ^†)_a b$ and $A_a b^μ=i/2(ξ^† ∂^μ ξ-ξ∂^μ ξ^†)_a b$ and $ξ=√(Σ)$. $Σ=Exp(2iM/f_P)$ is exponentially related to the light pseudoscalar mesons with [equation]

    Hadronic molecule interpretation of $T^+_{cc}$ and its beauty-partners · Low momentum interaction effective theory · 0.95

Uses its data or values 3 papers
  • In the third line, the first term describes the coupling between the charmed mesons and a pion, with the coupling constant $g̅≃0.27$;[Here the $g̅$ parameter is related to the $g$ parameter in Ref. [ref] by $g̅=g/2$.] the second term gives the magnetic couplings for the charmed mesons and a photon [ref] with the matrix of transition magnetic moments $μ_D=diag(μ_D^0,μ_D^+)$, where $μ_D^+=-0.15 GeV^-1$ and $μ_D^0=0.55 GeV^-1$ are obtained by reproducing the partial widths $Γ[D^*+→D^+γ]=1.33 keV$ [ref] and $Γ[D^*0 →D^0γ]=19.52 keV$ [ref] ; the last term is the isoscalar contact interaction for $D^*D→D^*D$.

    Radiative decays of the heavy-quark-spin molecular partner of $T_{cc}^+$ · Effective Lagrangian and Power Counting · 0.85

  • While $g_2$ and $c_1$ are unknown parameters at present, $β$ occurs in HH$χ$PT predictions involving measured quantities: Ref. [ref] obtains $β^-1 ∼1200$ MeV from radiative decays within the lowest charm meson multiplet, Ref. [ref] found $β^-1 = 275-375$ MeV, and Ref. [ref] included the effects of the excited charm meson multiplet to find $β^-1$ = 670 MeV.

    Radiative Decays X(3872) -> psi(2S)+gamma and psi(4040) -> X(3872)+gamma in Effective Field Theory · $→ψ(2S) γ$ · 0.98

  • Out of these 5 numbers, one is well known, $μ_h$, being fixed by the $D^*→Dγ$ ($B^*→Bγ$) partial branching fraction [ref] .

    Radiative Semileptonic Decays of Beautiful Hadrons · Discussion · 0.96

Compares with it 3 papers
  • To convert to our form, replace the $$ scale $μ$ in Ref. [ref] with the chiral scale $Λ$ and set their quantity $Δ̅$ to zero, where [equation] with $d$ the number of dimensions. $F(x)$ is only needed for positive $x$; so we use the simpler form given in Ref. [ref] , rather than the more general version worked out in Ref. [ref] and quoted in Ref. [ref] .

    Heavy-Light Semileptonic Decays in Staggered Chiral Perturbation Theory · Form factors for 3-flavor partially quenched · 0.96

  • The expression for the wave-function renormalization factor $Z_B^-$ obtained from the traditional HH$χ$PT Lagrangian differs from our result [ref] [ref] , but the sum of all corrections agrees with our result [ref].

    The Simplest B Decay, Precisely · Reorganizing HH$χ$PT · 0.99

  • This value is consistent with the predictions obtained using a similar formalism and older data [ref] and with those in various quark models [ref] .

    Weak decays of unstable $b$-mesons · $B_s^*→B_sγ$ and the $B_s^*$ width · 0.98

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.