arxiv: 2604.07113 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay from virtual pions

Oleksandr Tomalak

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th

keywords inverse beta decayQED radiative correctionsvirtual pionschiral perturbation theoryneutrino-nucleon scatteringantineutrino detectionform factor uncertainty

0 comments

The pith

Pion-induced QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay show kinematic dependence at or below nucleon form factor uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper evaluates QED radiative corrections from virtual pions in inverse beta decay using heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory to support precise cross section predictions for reactor and supernova antineutrinos. At leading order the only unsuppressed contribution comes from pion isospin splitting, while next-to-leading order terms from recoil and the Wilson coefficient c4 add to the kinematic dependence but remain small at energies above 10 MeV. The resulting corrections vary at a level comparable to or smaller than uncertainties already present from the momentum dependence of nucleon form factors. This calculation therefore removes an important source of theoretical error in charged-current elastic neutrino-nucleon scattering.

Core claim

The pion-induced QED radiative corrections to inverse beta decay exhibit a kinematic dependence at the level and below the uncertainty from the momentum dependence of the nucleon form factors, enabling sub-permille theoretical precision for charged-current elastic antineutrino-nucleon scattering at energies E_nu-bar greater than or equal to 10 MeV.

What carries the argument

Heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory applied to virtual-pion contributions, separating leading-order isospin-splitting effects from next-to-leading-order recoil and c4 terms that control the kinematic dependence.

If this is right

Inverse beta decay cross sections can now be computed with sub-permille theoretical precision for reactor and supernova antineutrino energies starting at 10 MeV.
The dominant remaining uncertainty in these predictions shifts to the momentum dependence of nucleon form factors.
Charged-current elastic neutrino-nucleon scattering calculations achieve sub-permille accuracy without further pion-radiative correction terms.
The small size of the kinematic dependence means virtual-pion effects do not need to be re-evaluated for each new energy point in the low-energy range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same separation of leading and next-to-leading contributions could be applied to related low-energy neutrino processes such as elastic neutrino-electron scattering to reach similar precision.
Future high-statistics reactor experiments could directly constrain the size of these corrections by comparing data across a range of energies.
If higher-order terms in the chiral expansion become relevant at energies modestly above 10 MeV, they would first appear in the kinematic dependence rather than in an overall normalization shift.

Load-bearing premise

Heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory remains valid at the energies considered and all next-to-leading-order radiative corrections including those involving the Wilson coefficient c4 remain relatively small without significant higher-order contributions altering the kinematic dependence.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the inverse beta decay cross section at antineutrino energies around or above 10 MeV that deviates by more than 0.1 percent from the prediction that includes these pion-induced corrections would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Inverse beta decay (IBD), $\overline{\nu}_e p \to e^+ n \left( \gamma \right)$, is the main detection channel for reactor and supernova antineutrinos. To provide precise IBD cross sections at antineutrino energies $E_{\overline{\nu}_e} \gtrsim 10~\mathrm{MeV}$, we evaluate radiative corrections from virtual pions within the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory. At leading order, only the pion isospin-splitting contributions are not suppressed by the electron mass. At next-to-leading order, besides recoil effects, only the Wilson coefficient $c_4$ contributes to the kinematic dependence. However, its precise value is not relevant for IBD at relatively low energies since all next-to-leading order radiative corrections are relatively small. We find the kinematic dependence of the pion-induced QED radiative corrections at the level and below the uncertainty from the momentum dependence of the nucleon form factors. Our results enable sub-permille theoretical precision of charged-current elastic (anti)neutrino-nucleon scattering at antineutrino energies $E_{\overline{\nu}_e} \gtrsim 10~\mathrm{MeV}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Pion QED corrections to IBD come out small in this HBChPT calc, supporting sub-permille precision above 10 MeV, but the lack of explicit NNLO checks leaves the convergence assumption untested.

read the letter

The punchline is that this calculation finds the pion-induced QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay to have kinematic dependence at or below nucleon form-factor uncertainties, supporting sub-permille precision above 10 MeV antineutrino energy. The paper applies heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory to isolate these corrections. It shows at leading order the isospin splitting dominates without electron mass suppression, and at next-to-leading order only recoil and c4 contribute to kinematics, but c4 turns out irrelevant because the terms are small overall. This provides a specific bound that extends earlier QED correction studies for this channel. It does well by sticking to the standard framework and delivering a clear conclusion on the size of the effect for practical use in neutrino detection. The main concern is whether the chiral expansion holds up. The result assumes higher-order terms do not spoil the small kinematic dependence, but without an explicit NNLO estimate or check on how they impact the energy dependence, that part rests on the assertion that NLO is already small. The stress-test note flags this correctly as needing verification. This work is aimed at people calculating precise IBD cross sections for reactor and supernova neutrinos. A reader in that niche would get a useful update on the theoretical error budget. It should go to peer review. The calculation is grounded enough to be worth referee time for checking the derivations and perhaps adding the higher-order discussion.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates QED radiative corrections to inverse beta decay (IBD), ν-bar_e p → e+ n(γ), arising from virtual pions in the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory (HBChPT). At leading order only the pion isospin-splitting contributions remain unsuppressed by the electron mass. At next-to-leading order, recoil corrections and the Wilson coefficient c4 enter the kinematic dependence, but the paper concludes that all NLO terms are relatively small and that the precise value of c4 is irrelevant at the energies considered. The central result is that the kinematic dependence of the pion-induced corrections lies at or below the uncertainty induced by the momentum dependence of the nucleon form factors, thereby enabling sub-permille theoretical precision for charged-current elastic (anti)neutrino-nucleon scattering at E_ν-bar ≳ 10 MeV.

Significance. If the truncation is reliable, the work supplies a useful systematic estimate of a previously unquantified class of radiative corrections that directly affects the precision of IBD cross sections employed in reactor and supernova neutrino analyses. The explicit demonstration within HBChPT that c4 drops out of the kinematic dependence at these energies is a concrete outcome of the calculation rather than an input assumption, and the comparison to nucleon form-factor uncertainties provides a clear benchmark. The result would therefore support sub-permille theoretical control of the charged-current channel once higher-order convergence is established.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and NLO results paragraph] Abstract and NLO results paragraph: The headline claim that the kinematic dependence remains at or below form-factor uncertainty (thereby enabling sub-permille precision) rests on the assertion that NLO corrections are small and that c4 is irrelevant. The manuscript provides no explicit estimate or bound on NNLO recoil, loop, or counterterm contributions to the energy dependence; without such a check the suppression of kinematic variation could be an artifact of the NLO truncation rather than a robust feature.

minor comments (2)

The abstract would be clearer if it stated the precise chiral orders (LO + NLO) already in the opening sentence rather than only in the body.
Notation for the Wilson coefficient c4 should include a short parenthetical reference to its appearance in the standard HBChPT Lagrangian to aid readers unfamiliar with the specific operator.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and NLO results paragraph] Abstract and NLO results paragraph: The headline claim that the kinematic dependence remains at or below form-factor uncertainty (thereby enabling sub-permille precision) rests on the assertion that NLO corrections are small and that c4 is irrelevant. The manuscript provides no explicit estimate or bound on NNLO recoil, loop, or counterterm contributions to the energy dependence; without such a check the suppression of kinematic variation could be an artifact of the NLO truncation rather than a robust feature.

Authors: We agree that an explicit NNLO calculation would provide stronger reassurance. Within HBChPT, however, the expansion is organized by the small parameter Q/Λ_χ ≃ m_π/(4π F_π) ≈ 0.2 at the relevant energies and momenta. NNLO contributions are therefore parametrically suppressed by an additional factor (Q/Λ_χ)^2 ≈ 0.04 relative to NLO. Because the NLO kinematic dependence we obtain is already at or below the 0.1 % level, the expected NNLO variation in the energy dependence is at most a few × 10^{-5}, well below the nucleon form-factor uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph that makes this power-counting estimate explicit and discusses its implications for the reliability of the NLO truncation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained within HBChPT

full rationale

The paper computes pion-induced QED radiative corrections for IBD using the standard heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory framework, with explicit power counting at LO and NLO. The statements that NLO terms (including c4) are relatively small at E_nu-bar >=10 MeV and that the resulting kinematic dependence lies below nucleon form-factor uncertainties are presented as outcomes of the calculation rather than inputs or self-referential fits. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatze smuggled via prior work appear in the load-bearing steps. The central claim follows directly from the ChPT Lagrangian and expansion without reducing to its own assumptions by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard assumptions of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory and the known momentum dependence of nucleon form factors; no new entities are introduced and the only potential free parameter (c4) is stated to be irrelevant at the energies of interest.

free parameters (1)

Wilson coefficient c4
NLO coefficient in the chiral Lagrangian whose precise numerical value is declared irrelevant for the kinematic dependence at low energies.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory is applicable to virtual-pion contributions in inverse beta decay at antineutrino energies above 10 MeV.
The entire evaluation of radiative corrections is performed inside this effective field theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1329 out tokens · 40726 ms · 2026-05-10T18:16:33.127647+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We evaluate radiative corrections from virtual pions within the framework of heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory... only the Wilson coefficient c4 contributes to the kinematic dependence.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

At leading order, only the pion isospin-splitting contributions... At next-to-leading order, besides recoil effects...

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Cowan, F

C.L. Cowan, F. Reines, F.B. Harrison, H.W. Kruse and A.D. McGuire,Detection of the free neutrino: A Confirmation,Science124(1956) 103. [2]Kamiokande-IIcollaboration,Observation of a Neutrino Burst from the Supernova SN 1987a,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1490

1956
[2]

Bionta et al.,Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,Phys

R.M. Bionta et al.,Observation of a Neutrino Burst in Coincidence with Supernova SN 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1494. [4]IMBcollaboration,Angular Distribution of Events From Sn1987a,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 3361

1987
[3]

Eguchiet al.(KamLAND), First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys

K.S. Hirata et al.,Observation in the Kamiokande-II Detector of the Neutrino Burst from Supernova SN 1987a,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 448. [6]KamLANDcollaboration,First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,Phys. Rev. Lett.90(2003) 021802 [hep-ex/0212021]. [7]KamLANDcollaboration,Measurement of neutrino oscillation with KamLAND:...

work page arXiv 1988
[4]

Vogel and J.F

P. Vogel and J.F. Beacom,Angular distribution of neutron inverse beta decay, anti-neutrino(e) + p —>e+ + n,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 053003 [hep-ph/9903554]

work page arXiv 1999
[5]

Kurylov, M.J

A. Kurylov, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and P. Vogel,Radiative corrections in neutrino deuterium disintegration,Phys. Rev. C65(2002) 055501 [nucl-th/0110051]

work page arXiv 2002
[6]

Kurylov, M.J

A. Kurylov, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and P. Vogel,Radiative corrections to low-energy neutrino reactions,Phys. Rev. C67(2003) 035502 [hep-ph/0211306]

work page arXiv 2003
[7]

Strumia and F

A. Strumia and F. Vissani,Precise quasielastic neutrino/nucleon cross-section,Phys. Lett. B 564(2003) 42 [astro-ph/0302055]

work page arXiv 2003
[8]

Ankowski,Improved estimate of the cross section for inverse beta decay,1601.06169

A.M. Ankowski,Improved estimate of the cross section for inverse beta decay,1601.06169

work page arXiv
[9]

Ricciardi, N

G. Ricciardi, N. Vignaroli and F. Vissani,An accurate evaluation of electron (anti-)neutrino scattering on nucleons,JHEP08(2022) 212 [2206.05567]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

On radiative corrections to inverse beta decay at low energies.arXiv:2512.07957

O. Tomalak,On radiative corrections to inverse beta decay at low energies,2512.07957

work page arXiv
[11]

Theory of inverse beta decay for reactor antineutrinos.arXiv:2512.07956

O. Tomalak,Theory of inverse beta decay for reactor antineutrinos,2512.07956. – 16 –

work page arXiv
[12]

Vogel,Analysis of the Anti-neutrino Capture on Protons,Phys

P. Vogel,Analysis of the Anti-neutrino Capture on Protons,Phys. Rev. D29(1984) 1918

1984
[13]

Fayans,Radiative Corrections and Recoil Effects in the Reaction¯νe +P→N+e + at Low-energies

S.A. Fayans,Radiative Corrections and Recoil Effects in the Reaction¯νe +P→N+e + at Low-energies. (In Russian),Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.42(1985) 590

1985
[14]

Sirlin,Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,Rev

A. Sirlin,Current Algebra Formulation of Radiative Corrections in Gauge Theories and the Universality of the Weak Interactions,Rev. Mod. Phys.50(1978) 573

1978
[15]

Ando, H.W

S. Ando, H.W. Fearing, V.P. Gudkov, K. Kubodera, F. Myhrer, S. Nakamura et al.,Neutron beta decay in effective field theory,Phys. Lett. B595(2004) 250 [nucl-th/0402100]

work page arXiv 2004
[16]

U. Raha, F. Myhrer and K. Kubodera,Radiative corrections to anti-neutrino proton scattering at low energies,Phys. Rev. C85(2012) 045502 [1112.2007]

work page arXiv 2012
[17]

Cirigliano, J

V. Cirigliano, J. de Vries, L. Hayen, E. Mereghetti and A. Walker-Loud,Pion-Induced Radiative Corrections to NeutronβDecay,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 121801 [2202.10439]

work page arXiv 2022
[18]

Cirigliano, W

V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti and O. Tomalak,Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes: Vector coupling,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 053003 [2306.03138]

work page arXiv 2023
[19]

Cirigliano, W

V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, E. Mereghetti and O. Tomalak,Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes. II. Axial-vector coupling,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 053005 [2410.21404]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Radiative corrections to the nucleon isovector $g_V$ and $g_A$

O. Tomalak and Y.-B. Yang,Radiative corrections to the nucleon isovectorgV andg A, 2603.08596

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[21]

Hoferichter, J

M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner,Matching pion-nucleon Roy-Steiner equations to chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 192301 [1507.07552]

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

Roy-Steiner-equation analysis of pion-nucleon scattering

M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner,Roy–Steiner-equation analysis of pion–nucleon scattering,Phys. Rept.625(2016) 1 [1510.06039]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[23]

Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite-Volume Corrections tog A.arXiv:2503.09891

Z.B. Hall et al.,Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite-Volume Corrections togA,2503.09891

work page arXiv
[24]

Falkowski, M

A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso, A. Palavrić and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez,Constraints on subleading interactions in beta decay Lagrangian,JHEP02(2024) 091 [2112.07688]

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Tomalak,Radiative Corrections to Neutron Beta Decay and (Anti)Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering from Low-Energy Effective Field Theory,Few Body Syst.64(2023) 23 [2302.00642]

O. Tomalak,Radiative Corrections to Neutron Beta Decay and (Anti)Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering from Low-Energy Effective Field Theory,Few Body Syst.64(2023) 23 [2302.00642]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Fermi,An attempt of a theory of beta radiation

E. Fermi,An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. 1.,Z. Phys.88(1934) 161

1934
[27]

Feynman and M

R.P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann,Theory of Fermi interaction,Phys. Rev.109(1958) 193

1958
[28]

van Ritbergen and R.G

T. van Ritbergen and R.G. Stuart,On the precise determination of the Fermi coupling constant from the muon lifetime,Nucl. Phys. B564(2000) 343 [hep-ph/9904240]. [60]MuLancollaboration,Detailed Report of the MuLan Measurement of the Positive Muon Lifetime and Determination of the Fermi Constant,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 052003 [1211.0960]

work page arXiv 2000
[29]

Cabibbo,Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays,Phys

N. Cabibbo,Unitary Symmetry and Leptonic Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 531

1963
[30]

Kobayashi and T

M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa,CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction,Prog. Theor. Phys.49(1973) 652. – 17 – [63]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of Particle Physics,PTEP2020(2020) 083C01

1973
[31]

Hardy and I.S

J.C. Hardy and I.S. Towner,Superallowed0+ →0 + nuclearβdecays: 2020 critical survey, with implications for Vud and CKM unitarity,Phys. Rev. C102(2020) 045501

2020
[32]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler,Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop,Annals Phys.158 (1984) 142

1984
[33]

Meissner and S

U.G. Meissner and S. Steininger,Isospin violation in pion nucleon scattering,Phys. Lett. B 419(1998) 403 [hep-ph/9709453]

work page arXiv 1998
[34]

Muller and U.-G

G. Muller and U.-G. Meissner,Virtual photons in baryon chiral perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B556(1999) 265 [hep-ph/9903375]

work page arXiv 1999
[35]

Chiral Perturbation Theory with Virtual Photons and Leptons

M. Knecht, H. Neufeld, H. Rupertsberger and P. Talavera,Chiral perturbation theory with virtual photons and leptons,Eur. Phys. J. C12(2000) 469 [hep-ph/9909284]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[36]

Gasser, M.A

J. Gasser, M.A. Ivanov, E. Lipartia, M. Mojzis and A. Rusetsky,Ground state energy of pionic hydrogen to one loop,Eur. Phys. J. C26(2002) 13 [hep-ph/0206068]

work page arXiv 2002
[37]

Gasser, M.E

J. Gasser, M.E. Sainio and A. Svarc,Nucleons with chiral loops,Nucl. Phys. B307(1988) 779

1988
[38]

Krause,Baryon Matrix Elements of the Vector Current in Chiral Perturbation Theory, Helv

A. Krause,Baryon Matrix Elements of the Vector Current in Chiral Perturbation Theory, Helv. Phys. Acta63(1990) 3

1990
[39]

Ecker and M

G. Ecker and M. Mojzis,Low-energy expansion of the pion - nucleon Lagrangian,Phys. Lett. B365(1996) 312 [hep-ph/9508204]

work page arXiv 1996
[40]

Bernard, N

V. Bernard, N. Kaiser and U.-G. Meissner,Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E4(1995) 193 [hep-ph/9501384]

work page arXiv 1995
[41]

Siemens, J

D. Siemens, J. Ruiz de Elvira, E. Epelbaum, M. Hoferichter, H. Krebs, B. Kubis et al., Reconciling threshold and subthreshold expansions for pion–nucleon scattering,Phys. Lett. B 770(2017) 27 [1610.08978]

work page arXiv 2017
[42]

Tomalak,Radiative (anti)neutrino energy spectra from muon, pion, and kaon decays, Phys

O. Tomalak,Radiative (anti)neutrino energy spectra from muon, pion, and kaon decays, Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137108 [2112.12395]

work page arXiv 2022
[43]

Heavy Hadron Chiral Perturbation Theory

P.L. Cho,Heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory,Nucl. Phys. B396(1993) 183 [hep-ph/9208244]

work page Pith review arXiv 1993
[44]

$\bar B\to\bar K\e^+\e^-$ in Chiral Perturbation Theory

A.F. Falk and B. Grinstein,Anti-B —>Anti-K e+ e- in Chiral Perturbation Theory,Nucl. Phys. B416(1994) 771 [hep-ph/9306310]

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[45]

Boyd and B

C.G. Boyd and B. Grinstein,Chiral and heavy quark symmetry violation in B decays,Nucl. Phys. B442(1995) 205 [hep-ph/9402340]

work page arXiv 1995
[46]

Stewart,Extraction of the D* D pi coupling from D* decays,Nucl

I.W. Stewart,Extraction of the D* D pi coupling from D* decays,Nucl. Phys. B529(1998) 62 [hep-ph/9803227]

work page arXiv 1998
[47]

Bouzas,Three and two point one loop integrals in heavy particle effective theories,Eur

A.O. Bouzas,Three and two point one loop integrals in heavy particle effective theories,Eur. Phys. J. C12(2000) 643 [hep-ph/9910536]

work page arXiv 2000
[48]

Fajfer, P

S. Fajfer, P. Singer and J. Zupan,The Rare decay D0 —>gamma gamma,Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 074008 [hep-ph/0104236]

work page arXiv 2001
[49]

Bouzas,Vertex integrals in heavy particle theories,AIP Conf

A.O. Bouzas,Vertex integrals in heavy particle theories,AIP Conf. Proc.623(2002) 277 [hep-ph/0112055]. – 18 –

work page arXiv 2002
[50]

Davydychev and A.G

A.I. Davydychev and A.G. Grozin,HQET quark - gluon vertex at one loop,Eur. Phys. J. C 20(2001) 333 [hep-ph/0103078]

work page arXiv 2001
[51]

Zupan,One loop scalar functions in the heavy quark effective theory,Eur

J. Zupan,One loop scalar functions in the heavy quark effective theory,Eur. Phys. J. C25 (2002) 233 [hep-ph/0202135]

work page arXiv 2002
[52]

Bouzas and R

A.O. Bouzas and R. Flores-Mendieta,One loop vertex integrals in heavy particle effective theories,J. Phys. G28(2002) 1179 [hep-ph/0202268]

work page arXiv 2002
[53]

Becirevic, S

D. Becirevic, S. Prelovsek and J. Zupan,B —>pi and B —>K transitions in standard and quenched chiral perturbation theory,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 054010 [hep-lat/0210048]. [87]MINER vAcollaboration,Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino–proton scattering,Nature614(2023) 48

work page arXiv 2003
[54]

Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from radiatively-corrected antineutrino scattering data

O. Tomalak, A.S. Meyer, C. Wret, T. Cai, R.J. Hill and K.S. McFarland,Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from radiatively-corrected antineutrino scattering data,2601.21155

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[55]

Deuterium target data for precision neutrino-nucleus cross sections

A.S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran and R.J. Hill,Deuterium target data for precision neutrino-nucleus cross sections,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 113015 [1603.03048]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[56]

Petti, R.J

R. Petti, R.J. Hill and O. Tomalak,Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from future neutrino experiments,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L051301 [2309.02509]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Mertig, M

R. Mertig, M. Bohm and A. Denner,FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes,Comput. Phys. Commun.64(1991) 345

1991
[58]

Hahn and M

T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria,Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions,Comput. Phys. Commun.118(1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565]

work page arXiv 1999
[59]

New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0

V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana,New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0,Comput. Phys. Commun.207(2016) 432 [1601.01167]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[60]

Wolfram Research, Inc.,Mathematica, Version 12.2.0.0, 2022

2022
[61]

MacAskill,Datagraph 3.0,Journal of Statistical Software47(2012) 1–9

M.R. MacAskill,Datagraph 3.0,Journal of Statistical Software47(2012) 1–9. – 19 –

2012