pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.08596 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-09 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Radiative corrections to the nucleon isovector g_V and g_A

Oleksandr Tomalak , Yi-Bo Yang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 13:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords radiative correctionsnucleon axial couplingg_Alattice QCDelectroweak correctionspion mass splittingbeta decayQCD corrections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radiative corrections enhanced by large logarithms shift the expected lattice QCD value for the nucleon axial coupling g_A to 1.24-1.27.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines electroweak, QCD, and QED radiative corrections to the nucleon low-energy couplings g_V and g_A. These corrections grow large because of perturbative logarithms that stretch from the electroweak scale through the hadronic scale down to the MeV regime. The authors also include higher-order pion-mass splitting contributions to the axial-vector charge. Treating all effects together yields a total correction of 3.5(2.1)% or 5.6(0.7)% depending on the choice of input data. The result revises the value lattice QCD is expected to produce for g_A once these corrections are accounted for.

Core claim

By consistently incorporating electroweak, QCD, and QED radiative corrections enhanced by large perturbative logarithms between the electroweak and hadronic scale as well as between the hadronic scale and the low-energy MeV scale, together with higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to the nucleon axial-vector charge, the total radiative correction to the physical g_A is found to be 3.5(2.1)% (5.6(0.7)%). This leads to an expected lattice-QCD result of g^QCD_A = 1.265(26) (g^QCD_A = 1.240(9)) when based on a combination of lattice-QCD and data-driven (or only data-driven) inputs.

What carries the argument

The consistent summation of large logarithmic radiative corrections across electroweak, hadronic, and MeV scales combined with pion-mass splitting terms applied to the axial-vector charge.

If this is right

  • The relation between lattice QCD results and the physical value of g_A is revised by the calculated correction factor.
  • Future lattice QCD studies must apply these radiative and pion-mass corrections when comparing their outputs to experimental g_A.
  • Chiral perturbation theory calculations can now be used to reduce the uncertainty in the 3.5-5.6% correction.
  • Phenomenological analyses of nucleon beta decay will incorporate the updated central value and error.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same logarithmic corrections are likely to affect other low-energy nucleon weak matrix elements that lattice groups compute at unphysical pion masses.
  • Discrepancies between lattice and experiment in related observables such as the nucleon magnetic moment may receive similar adjustments once the full set of radiative effects is included.
  • Precision tests of CKM unitarity that rely on g_A will shift by a few percent once the revised lattice-to-physical mapping is adopted.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to the nucleon axial-vector charge are large enough to require consistent inclusion, along with specific choices for the scales at which the perturbative logarithms are evaluated.

What would settle it

A high-precision lattice QCD calculation of g_A performed directly at the physical pion mass that falls clearly outside the predicted range 1.24-1.27 after the corrections are applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08596 by Oleksandr Tomalak, Yi-Bo Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Perturbatively improved relative radiative correction to the nucleon low-energy coupling constants δg LL V (µχ = me) and δg LL A (µχ=me) g (0) A is shown as a function of the hadronic scale µ0. The full one-loop result for the radiative correction becomes independent of the scale µ0 once the relevant hadronic contributions are taken into account. In the following, we illustrate this explicitly for the vect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The expected lattice-QCD result for the nucleon axial-vector charge, based on the experimen￾tal measurements of gA [36] and up-to-date radiative corrections evaluated in this work, is compared to the Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) average of lattice-QCD calculations [37–51]. The results of this work are presented for three cases: using NLO HBChPT coupling constants in radiative corrections from N3L… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electroweak, QCD, and QED radiative corrections to the nucleon low-energy coupling constants $g_V$ and $g_A$ are enhanced by large perturbative logarithms between the electroweak and hadronic scale, as well as between the hadronic scale and the low-energy MeV scale. Additionally, higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to the nucleon axial-vector charge might be large. By consistently incorporating these effects, we provide an updated relation between the lattice-QCD and physical $g_A$, finding a total radiative correction of $3.5(2.1)\%$ ($5.6(0.7)\%$). This leads to an expected lattice-QCD result of $g^{\mathrm{QCD}}_A = 1.265(26)$ ($g^{\mathrm{QCD}}_A = 1.240(9)$) when based on a combination of lattice-QCD and data-driven (or only data-driven) inputs, respectively. Future phenomenological, chiral perturbation theory, and lattice-QCD studies can improve both the central value and the uncertainty of this estimate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes electroweak, QCD, and QED radiative corrections to the nucleon isovector couplings g_V and g_A, enhanced by large logarithms between the electroweak, hadronic, and MeV scales. It additionally incorporates higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to g_A and derives an updated relation between lattice-QCD and physical values, yielding total radiative corrections of 3.5(2.1)% (5.6(0.7)%) and expected lattice results g^QCD_A = 1.265(26) (1.240(9)) based on combined or data-driven inputs.

Significance. If the central estimates hold, the work supplies a refined bridge between lattice-QCD computations and the physical g_A that is relevant for precision electroweak tests and nucleon structure phenomenology. The consistent treatment of scale-separated logarithms and the use of perturbative matching with external inputs from known couplings constitute a methodological strength that can be built upon by future ChPT and lattice studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the headline total correction 3.5(2.1)% (5.6(0.7)%) and the derived g^QCD_A values rest on the assertion that higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to the axial charge are large enough to require consistent inclusion, yet no explicit NLO or higher ChPT calculation, numerical bound, or power-counting estimate is supplied to justify that these terms exceed the quoted uncertainty.
  2. [Scale choices] Main text (scale discussion): the choice of matching scales for the perturbative logarithms between electroweak, hadronic, and MeV regimes is presented without a dedicated variation study or sensitivity analysis, leaving the robustness of the central values and uncertainties unquantified.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the two scenarios (combined lattice+data vs. data-driven only) could be clarified with a short table or explicit equation labels to avoid reader confusion when comparing the two quoted corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and main text: the headline total correction 3.5(2.1)% (5.6(0.7)%) and the derived g^QCD_A values rest on the assertion that higher-order pion-mass splitting corrections to the axial charge are large enough to require consistent inclusion, yet no explicit NLO or higher ChPT calculation, numerical bound, or power-counting estimate is supplied to justify that these terms exceed the quoted uncertainty.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript states these corrections 'might be large' without supplying an explicit power-counting estimate or bound from ChPT. This is a fair observation. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph providing a chiral power-counting argument that estimates the size of higher-order pion-mass splitting contributions to g_A at the 1-2% level, comparable to the quoted uncertainties, thereby justifying their inclusion in the central value. The abstract and main text will be updated to reference this estimate. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Scale choices] Main text (scale discussion): the choice of matching scales for the perturbative logarithms between electroweak, hadronic, and MeV regimes is presented without a dedicated variation study or sensitivity analysis, leaving the robustness of the central values and uncertainties unquantified.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated sensitivity analysis would strengthen the presentation. In the revision we will add a study (in the main text or an appendix) in which the hadronic matching scale is varied between 0.8 and 1.2 GeV and the low-energy scale between 100 and 500 MeV, reporting the resulting shifts in the central values and uncertainties of the total radiative corrections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; corrections derived from external QFT inputs

full rationale

The derivation computes electroweak/QCD/QED radiative corrections and pion-mass effects via perturbative matching and ChPT using known couplings, scales, and external inputs. The relation g^QCD_A = physical g_A minus total correction is a direct subtraction, not a fit or self-definition of the target quantity. No self-citation chain, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled via prior work reduces the central result to its own inputs by construction. The note on possible large higher-order pion-mass terms affects the uncertainty estimate but does not create a definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on standard QFT axioms and effective theory assumptions, with some freedom in scale choices for matching.

free parameters (1)
  • matching scales
    Scales chosen for separating perturbative regimes between electroweak and hadronic scales, and hadronic and MeV scales.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard model electroweak and QCD interactions
    Relies on perturbative QFT calculations of radiative corrections.
  • domain assumption Chiral perturbation theory for low-energy hadronic effects
    Used for pion-mass splitting corrections to g_A.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1345 out tokens · 47807 ms · 2026-05-15T13:31:47.911283+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay from virtual pions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Pion-induced QED radiative corrections in inverse beta decay are small, at or below nucleon form factor uncertainties, enabling sub-permille theoretical precision for charged-current neutrino-nucleon scattering above 10 MeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M.; et al

    Gonzalez, F. M.; et al. (UCNτ Collaboration). Improved neutron lifetime measurement with UCNτ.Phys. Rev. Lett.2021,127, 162501

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Measurement of the weak axial-vector coupling constant in the decay of free neutrons using a pulsed cold neutron beam.Phys

    Märkisch, B.; et al. Measurement of the weak axial-vector coupling constant in the decay of free neutrons using a pulsed cold neutron beam.Phys. Rev. Lett.2019,122, 242501

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Exotic decay channels are not the cause of the neutron lifetime anomaly

    Dubbers, D.; Saul, H.; Märkisch, B.; Soldner, T.; Abele, H. Exotic decay channels are not the cause of the neutron lifetime anomaly. Phys. Lett. B2019,791, 6–10

    work page

  4. [4]

    (JUNO Collaboration)

    An, F.; et al. (JUNO Collaboration). Neutrino physics with JUNO.J. Phys. G2016,43, 030401

    work page

  5. [5]

    (JUNO Collaboration)

    Abusleme, A.; et al. (JUNO Collaboration). JUNO physics and detector.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.2022,123, 103927

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    (JUNO Collaboration)

    Abusleme, A.; et al. (JUNO Collaboration). Sub-percent precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with JUNO. Chin. Phys. C2022,46, 123001

    work page

  7. [7]

    (JUNO Collaboration)

    Abusleme, A.; et al. (JUNO Collaboration). First measurement of reactor neutrino oscillations at JUNO.arXiv:2511.14593

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes: vector coupling.Phys

    Cirigliano, V .; Dekens, W.; Mereghetti, E.; Tomalak, O. Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes: vector coupling.Phys. Rev. D2023,108, 053003

    work page

  9. [9]

    Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes

    Cirigliano, V .; Dekens, W.; Mereghetti, E.; Tomalak, O. Effective field theory for radiative corrections to charged-current processes. II. Axial-vector coupling.Phys. Rev. D2025,111, 053005

    work page

  10. [10]

    Theory of inverse beta decay for reactor antineutrinos.arXiv:2512.07956

    Tomalak, O. Theory of inverse beta decay for reactor antineutrinos.arXiv:2512.07956

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    On radiative corrections to inverse beta decay at low energies.arXiv:2512.07957

    Tomalak, O. On radiative corrections to inverse beta decay at low energies.arXiv:2512.07957

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    J.; Sirlin, A

    Marciano, W. J.; Sirlin, A. Improved calculation of electroweak radiative corrections and the value of Vud.Phys. Rev. Lett.2006,96, 032002

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Seng, C.-Y.; Gorchtein, M.; Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. Dispersive evaluation of the inner radiative correction in neutron and nuclear β decay.Phys. Rev. D2019,100, 013001

    work page

  14. [14]

    H.; Ramsey-Musolf, M

    Seng, C.-Y.; Gorchtein, M.; Patel, H. H.; Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. Reduced hadronic uncertainty in the determination ofVud.Phys. Rev. Lett.2018,121, 241804

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    J.; Sirlin, A

    Czarnecki, A.; Marciano, W. J.; Sirlin, A. Radiative corrections to neutron and nuclear beta decays revisited.Phys. Rev. D2019, 100, 073008

    work page

  16. [16]

    Standard modelO(α)renormalization ofg A and its impact on new physics searches.Phys

    Hayen, L. Standard modelO(α)renormalization ofg A and its impact on new physics searches.Phys. Rev. D2021,103, 113001

    work page

  17. [17]

    G.; Melnitchouk, W

    Shiells, K.; Blunden, P . G.; Melnitchouk, W. Electroweak axial structure functions and improved extraction of theVud CKM matrix element.Phys. Rev. D2021,104, 033003

    work page

  18. [18]

    First-principles calculation of electroweak box diagrams from lattice QCD

    Feng, X.; Gorchtein, M.; Jin, L.-C.; Ma, P .-X.; Seng, C.-Y. First-principles calculation of electroweak box diagrams from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett.2020,124, 192002

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Lattice QCD calculation of electroweak box contributions to superallowed nuclear and neutron beta decays.Phys

    Ma, P .-X.; et al. Lattice QCD calculation of electroweak box contributions to superallowed nuclear and neutron beta decays.Phys. Rev. Lett.2024,132, 191901

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    L.; Mereghetti, E

    Crosas, Ó. L.; Mereghetti, E. Radiative corrections to superallowed beta decays atO(α 2Z).JHEP2026,02, 114

    work page

  21. [21]

    J.; Plestid, R.; Vander Griend, P

    Cao, Z.; Hill, R. J.; Plestid, R.; Vander Griend, P . TheZα2 correction to superallowed beta decays in effective field theory and implications for|V ud|.arXiv:2511.05446

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Pion-induced radiative corrections to neutronβ decay.Phys

    Cirigliano, V .; de Vries, J.; Hayen, L.; Mereghetti, E.; Walker-Loud, A. Pion-induced radiative corrections to neutronβ decay.Phys. Rev. Lett.2022,129, 121801

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Hybrid analysis of radiative corrections to neutron decay with current algebra and effective field theory.JHEP2024, 07, 175

    Seng, C.-Y. Hybrid analysis of radiative corrections to neutron decay with current algebra and effective field theory.JHEP2024, 07, 175

    work page

  24. [25]

    J.; Tomalak, O

    Hill, R. J.; Tomalak, O. On the effective theory of neutrino-electron and neutrino-quark interactions.Phys. Lett. B2020,805, 135466

    work page

  25. [26]

    Matching pion-nucleon Roy-Steiner equations to chiral perturbation theory.Phys

    Hoferichter, M.; Ruiz de Elvira, J.; Kubis, B.; Meissner, U. Matching pion-nucleon Roy-Steiner equations to chiral perturbation theory.Phys. Rev. Lett.2015,11519, 192301

    work page 2015

  26. [27]

    Roy–Steiner-equation analysis of pion–nucleon scattering.Phys.Rept

    Hoferichter, M.; Ruiz de Elvira, J.; Kubis, B.; Meissner, U. Roy–Steiner-equation analysis of pion–nucleon scattering.Phys.Rept. 2016,625, 1-88

    work page 2016

  27. [28]

    Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite-Volume Corrections tog A.arXiv:2503.09891

    Hall, Zack B.; et al. Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite-Volume Corrections tog A.arXiv:2503.09891

    work page arXiv

  28. [29]

    Precision determination of nucleon iso-vector scalar and tensor charges at the physical point.arXiv:2511.02326

    Wang, J.; Hu, Zh.; Ji, X.; Jiang, X.; Su, Y.; Sun, P .; Yang, Y. Precision determination of nucleon iso-vector scalar and tensor charges at the physical point.arXiv:2511.02326

    work page arXiv

  29. [30]

    Two-photon exchange contribution to elastice− -proton scattering: Full dispersive treatment ofπN states and comparison with data.Phys

    Tomalak, O.; Pasquini, B.; Vanderhaeghen, M. Two-photon exchange contribution to elastice− -proton scattering: Full dispersive treatment ofπN states and comparison with data.Phys. Rev. D2017,969, 096001

    work page

  30. [31]

    Dispersion relation formalism for the two-photon exchange correction to elastic muon–proton scattering: elastic intermediate state.Eur

    Tomalak, O.; Vanderhaeghen, M. Dispersion relation formalism for the two-photon exchange correction to elastic muon–proton scattering: elastic intermediate state.Eur. Phys. J. C2018,786, 514

    work page

  31. [32]

    Two-Photon Exchange Correction to the Lamb Shift and Hyperfine Splitting of S Levels.Eur

    Tomalak, O. Two-Photon Exchange Correction to the Lamb Shift and Hyperfine Splitting of S Levels.Eur. Phys. J. A2019,555, 64

    work page

  32. [33]

    Electromagnetic proton–neutron mass difference.Eur

    Tomalak, O. Electromagnetic proton–neutron mass difference.Eur. Phys. J. Plus2020,1356, 411

    work page

  33. [34]

    Field redefinitions and wave function renormalization to O(p**4) in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory.JHEP1999,04031

    Kambor, J.; Mojzis, M. Field redefinitions and wave function renormalization to O(p**4) in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory.JHEP1999,04031

    work page

  34. [35]

    The Nucleon axial-vector coupling beyond one loop.Phys

    Bernard, V .; Meissner, U. The Nucleon axial-vector coupling beyond one loop.Phys. Lett. B2006,639278-282

    work page

  35. [36]

    Review of particle physics.Phys

    Navas, S. Review of particle physics.Phys. Rev. D2024,1103, 030001

    work page

  36. [37]

    FLAG review 2024Phys

    Aoki, Y.; et al. FLAG review 2024Phys. Rev. D2026,1131, 014508

    work page

  37. [38]

    Chang, C. C. et al. A per-cent-level determination of the nucleon axial coupling from quantum chromodynamics.Nature2018, 558, 91–94

    work page

  38. [39]

    Walker-Loud, A. et al. Lattice QCD Determination ofg A.PoS2020,CD2018, 020

    work page

  39. [40]

    [Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME)]d Nucleon isovector axial form factors.Phys

    Jang, Y.-C.; Gupta, R.; Bhattacharya, T.; Yoon, B.; Lin, H.-W. [Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Elements (PNDME)]d Nucleon isovector axial form factors.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 014503

    work page

  40. [41]

    [Extended Twisted Mass] Nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors using twisted-mass fermion ensembles at the physical point.Phys

    Alexandrou, C.; Bacchio, S.; Constantinou, M.; Finkenrath, J.; Frezzotti, R.; Kostrzewa, B.; Koutsou, G.; Spanoudes, G.; Urbach, C. [Extended Twisted Mass] Nucleon axial and pseudoscalar form factors using twisted-mass fermion ensembles at the physical point.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 034503

    work page

  41. [42]

    Quark spins and Anomalous Ward Identity.Phys

    Liang, J.; Yang, Y.-B.; Draper, T.; Gong, M.; Liu, K.-F. Quark spins and Anomalous Ward Identity.Phys. Rev. D2018,98, 074505

    work page

  42. [43]

    [Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME)] Precision nucleon charges and form factors using (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD.Phys

    Park, S.; Gupta, R.; Yoon, B.; Mondal, S.; Bhattacharya, T.; Jang, Y.-C.; Joo, B.; Winter, F. [Nucleon Matrix Elements (NME)] Precision nucleon charges and form factors using (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D2022,105, 054505

    work page

  43. [44]

    Smail, R. E. et al. [QCDSF/UKQCD/CSSM] Constraining beyond the standard model nucleon isovector charges.Phys. Rev. D 2023,108, 094511

    work page 2023

  44. [45]

    S.; Collins, S.; Heybrock, S.; Löffler, M.; Rödl, R.; Söldner, W.; Weishäupl, S

    Bali, G. S.; Collins, S.; Heybrock, S.; Löffler, M.; Rödl, R.; Söldner, W.; Weishäupl, S. [RQCD] Octet baryon isovector charges from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D2023,108, 034512

    work page

  45. [46]

    B.; Ottnad, K.; Wittig, H

    Djukanovic, D.; von Hippel, G.; Meyer, H. B.; Ottnad, K.; Wittig, H. Improved analysis of isovector nucleon matrix elements with Nf=2+1 flavors of O(a) improved Wilson fermions.Phys. Rev. D2024,109, 074507

    work page

  46. [47]

    B.; Ottnad, K.; Wilhelm, J.; Wittig, H.; Wrang, L

    Harris, T.; von Hippel, G.; Junnarkar, P .; Meyer, H. B.; Ottnad, K.; Wilhelm, J.; Wittig, H.; Wrang, L. Nucleon isovector charges and twist-2 matrix elements withN f =2+1 dynamical Wilson quarks.Phys. Rev. D2019,100, 034513

    work page

  47. [48]

    S.; Barca, L.; Collins, S.; Gruber, M.; Löffler, M.; Schäfer, A.; Söldner, W.; Wein, P .; Weishäupl, S.; Wurm, T

    Bali, G. S.; Barca, L.; Collins, S.; Gruber, M.; Löffler, M.; Schäfer, A.; Söldner, W.; Wein, P .; Weishäupl, S.; Wurm, T. [RQCD] Nucleon axial structure from lattice QCD.JHEP2020,05, 126

    work page

  48. [49]

    B.; Ottnad, K.; Schulz, T.; Wittig, H

    Djukanovic, D.; von Hippel, G.; Koponen, J.; Meyer, H. B.; Ottnad, K.; Schulz, T.; Wittig, H. Isovector axial form factor of the nucleon from lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D2022,106, 074503

    work page

  49. [50]

    Isovector Charges of the Nucleon from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD.Phys

    Gupta, R.; Jang, Y.-C.; Yoon, B.; Lin, H.-W.; Cirigliano, V .; Bhattacharya, T. Isovector Charges of the Nucleon from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D2018,98, 034503

    work page

  50. [51]

    [PNDME] Iso-vector and Iso-scalar Tensor Charges of the Nucleon from Lattice QCD.Phys

    Bhattacharya, T.; Cirigliano, V .; Cohen, S.; Gupta, R.; Joseph, A.; Lin, H.-W.; Yoon, B. [PNDME] Iso-vector and Iso-scalar Tensor Charges of the Nucleon from Lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D2015,92, 094511

    work page

  51. [52]

    J.; Lee G.; Tomalak, O

    Borah, K.; Hill, R. J.; Lee G.; Tomalak, O. Parametrization and applications of the low-Q2 nucleon vector form factors.Phys. Rev. D2020,1027, 074012

    work page

  52. [53]

    Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino–proton scattering.Nature2023,6147946, 48-53

    Cai, T.; et al. Measurement of the axial vector form factor from antineutrino–proton scattering.Nature2023,6147946, 48-53

    work page

  53. [54]

    S.; Wret C.; Cai, T.; Hill R

    Tomalak O.; Meyer, A. S.; Wret C.; Cai, T.; Hill R. J.; McFarland K. S. Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from radiatively-corrected antineutrino scattering data.Phys. Rev. D2026,113, 073004

    work page

  54. [55]

    Wolfram Research, Inc.Mathematica, Version 12.2.0.0; Wolfram Research, Inc.: Champaign, IL, USA, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [56]

    DataGraph.J

    MacAskill, M.R. DataGraph.J. Stat. Softw.2012,47, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12120109 Universe2026,12, 109 13 of 13 Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim re...

    work page doi:10.3390/universe12120109 2012