Renormalon Model Predictions for Power-Corrections to Flavour Singlet Deep Inelastic Structure Functions

A. Sch\"afer; E. Stein; L. Mankiewicz; M. Maul

RECORD

Renormalon Model Predictions for Power-Corrections to Flavour Singlet Deep Inelastic Structure Functions

E. Stein, M. Maul, L. Mankiewicz, A. Schäfer

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 13 Mar 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our calculations, together with previous results for the non-singlet contribution, allow to model the x-dependence of higher twist corrections to F_2, F_L and g_1 in the whole x domain.

how it is stated · asserted 0.94 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-ph/9803342 (version 3)

Pith IDX3YUPPVA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA. Sch\"afer, E. Stein, L. Mankiewicz, M. Maul. "Renormalon Model Predictions for Power-Corrections to Flavour Singlet Deep Inelastic Structure Functions." arXiv:hep-ph/9803342 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/X3YUPPVA

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,305 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.86 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We analyze power corrections to flavour singlet deep inelastic scattering structure functions in the framework of the infrared renormalon model. Our calculations, together with previous results for the non-singlet contribution, allow to model the x-dependence of higher twist corrections to F_2, F_L and g_1 in the whole x domain.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We analyze power corrections to flavour singlet deep inelastic scattering structure functions in the framework of the infrared renormalon model.	contribution 0.93	0.92	0.08	asserted 0.90
s1	Our calculations, together with previous results for the non-singlet contribution, allow to model the x-dependence of higher twist corrections to F_2, F_L and g_1 in the whole x domain.	result 0.89	0.85	0.71	asserted 0.94

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.58.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

We analyze power corrections to flavour singlet deep inelastic scattering structure functions in the framework of the infrared renormalon model. Our calculations, together with previous results for the non-singlet contribution, allow to model the x-dependence of higher twist corrections to F_2, F_L and g_1 in the whole x domain.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper

Theoretical studies of the HT effects are less developed than those of the leading, twist-2 contributions (see Refs. [ref] ), but some phenomenological studies of the HT corrections have previously been performed [ref] .

Impact of parity-violating deep-inelastic scattering on the weak mixing angle and high-$x$ parton distributions · Higher twist effects · 0.98

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.