Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Perturbative QCD Correction to the Light-Cone Sum Rule for the $B^*B\pi $ and $D^*D\pi$ Couplings

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 20 Mar 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We obtain $g_{B^*B\pi}= 22\pm 7$ and $g_{D^*D\pi}=10.5\pm 3$, where the error indicates the remaining theoretical uncertainty.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9903421 (version 1)
Pith IDNPGE6APJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Khodjamirian, O.Yakovlev, R. R\"uckl, S. Weinzierl. "Perturbative QCD Correction to the Light-Cone Sum Rule for the $B^*B\pi $ and $D^*D\pi$ Couplings." arXiv:hep-ph/9903421 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/NPGE6APJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,625 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.48 · states limitation 0.84 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The $B^*B\pi$ and $D^*D\pi$ couplings have previously been derived from a QCD light-cone sum rule in leading order. Here, we describe the calculation of the $O(\alpha_s)$ correction to the twist 2 term of this sum rule. The result is used for a first next-to-leading order analysis. We obtain $g_{B^*B\pi}= 22\pm 7$ and $g_{D^*D\pi}=10.5\pm 3$, where the error indicates the remaining theoretical uncertainty.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The $B^*B\pi$ and $D^*D\pi$ couplings have previously been derived from a QCD light-cone sum rule in leading order. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Here, we describe the calculation of the $O(\alpha_s)$ correction to the twist 2 term of this sum rule. contribution 0.90 0.94 0.06 asserted 0.96
s2 The result is used for a first next-to-leading order analysis. contribution 0.71 0.82 0.05 asserted 0.99
s3 We obtain $g_{B^*B\pi}= 22\pm 7$ and $g_{D^*D\pi}=10.5\pm 3$, where the error indicates the remaining theoretical uncertainty. result 1.00 0.97 0.91 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The $B^*B\pi$ and $D^*D\pi$ couplings have previously been derived from a QCD light-cone sum rule in leading order. Here, we describe the calculation of the $O(\alpha_s)$ correction to the twist 2 term of this sum rule. The result is used for a first next-to-leading order analysis. We obtain $g_{B^*B\pi}= 22\pm 7$ and $g_{D^*D\pi}=10.5\pm 3$, where the error indicates the remaining theoretical uncertainty.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 25 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 15 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Uses its data or values 2 papers
Compares with it 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.