Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Leading nucleon and inelasticity in hadron-nucleus interactions

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 19 May 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Using an Iterative Leading Particle Model and the Glauber model, we relate the leading particle distribution in nucleon-nucleus interactions with the respective one in nucleon-proton collisions.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9905402 (version 1)
Pith ID6XGU7PAP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJ.Bellandi, J.Dias de Deus, J.R.Fleitas. "Leading nucleon and inelasticity in hadron-nucleus interactions." arXiv:hep-ph/9905402 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/6XGU7PAP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,521 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.05 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.16 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.11 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present in this paper a calculation of the average proton-nucleus ine- lasticity. Using an Iterative Leading Particle Model and the Glauber model, we relate the leading particle distribution in nucleon-nucleus interactions with the respective one in nucleon-proton collisions. To describe the leading particle distribution in nucleon-proton collisions, we use the Regge-Mueller formalism. To appear in Journal of Physics G.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present in this paper a calculation of the average proton-nucleus ine- lasticity. contribution 0.99 0.94 0.19 asserted 0.95
s1 Using an Iterative Leading Particle Model and the Glauber model, we relate the leading particle distribution in nucleon-nucleus interactions with the respective one in nucleon-proton collisions. method 0.94 0.88 0.13 asserted 1.00
s2 To describe the leading particle distribution in nucleon-proton collisions, we use the Regge-Mueller formalism. method 1.00 0.57 0.04 asserted 0.97
s3 To appear in Journal of Physics G. background 0.62 0.03 0.01 unclear 0.70

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.58.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present in this paper a calculation of the average proton-nucleus ine- lasticity. Using an Iterative Leading Particle Model and the Glauber model, we relate the leading particle distribution in nucleon-nucleus interactions with the respective one in nucleon-proton collisions. To describe the leading particle distribution in nucleon-proton collisions, we use the Regge-Mueller formalism. To appear in Journal of Physics G.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.