Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Searching for New Physics in Non-Leptonic B Decays

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 7 Jun 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim A future measurement of observables lying significantly outside of these regions would indicate the presence of new physics.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.93 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9906274 (version 2)
Pith IDEBGGPVTS, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJoaquim Matias, Robert Fleischer. "Searching for New Physics in Non-Leptonic B Decays." arXiv:hep-ph/9906274 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/EBGGPVTS
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,979 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.25 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.18 · compares with prior results 0.12 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present allowed regions in the space of observables of certain non-leptonic B-meson decays that characterize these modes within the Standard Model. A future measurement of observables lying significantly outside of these regions would indicate the presence of new physics. Making use of SU(3) arguments, we give the range for $B\to\pi K$ decays, and for the system of $B_d\to\pi^+\pi^-$, $B_s\to K^+K^-$ modes.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present allowed regions in the space of observables of certain non-leptonic B-meson decays that characterize these modes within the Standard Model. contribution 0.72 0.91 0.18 asserted 1.00
s1 A future measurement of observables lying significantly outside of these regions would indicate the presence of new physics. interpretation 0.98 0.11 0.47 hedged possibility 0.93
s2 Making use of SU(3) arguments, we give the range for $B\to\pi K$ decays, and for the system of $B_d\to\pi^+\pi^-$, $B_s\to K^+K^-$ modes. contribution 0.55 0.91 0.10 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.61.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present allowed regions in the space of observables of certain non-leptonic B-meson decays that characterize these modes within the Standard Model. A future measurement of observables lying significantly outside of these regions would indicate the presence of new physics. Making use of SU(3) arguments, we give the range for $B\to\pi K$ decays, and for the system of $B_d\to\pi^+\pi^-$, $B_s\to K^+K^-$ modes.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

3 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 4 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.