Pith. Sign in

RECORD

More about on the short distance contribution to the "B_c -> B_u^* gamma" decay

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 31 Jul 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We observe that the transition form factor predicted by the QCD sum rules method is approximately two times larger compared to the result predicted by the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein and Wise model.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9908203 (version 3)
Pith IDUFUMXJWZ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationM. Savci (Middle East Technical University-Ankara-Turkey), T. M. Aliev. "More about on the short distance contribution to the "B_c -> B_u^* gamma" decay." arXiv:hep-ph/9908203 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/UFUMXJWZ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,324 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.74 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.28 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.91 · compares with prior results 0.98 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We calculate the transition form factor for the 'B_c -> B_u^* gamma' decay taking into account only the short distance contribution, in framework of QCD sum rules method. We observe that the transition form factor predicted by the QCD sum rules method is approximately two times larger compared to the result predicted by the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein and Wise model.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We calculate the transition form factor for the 'B_c -> B_u^* gamma' decay taking into account only the short distance contribution, in framework of QCD sum rules method. contribution 0.96 0.96 0.16 asserted 0.99
s1 We observe that the transition form factor predicted by the QCD sum rules method is approximately two times larger compared to the result predicted by the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein and Wise model. result 1.00 0.86 0.62 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We calculate the transition form factor for the 'B_c -> B_u^* gamma' decay taking into account only the short distance contribution, in framework of QCD sum rules method. We observe that the transition form factor predicted by the QCD sum rules method is approximately two times larger compared to the result predicted by the Isgur, Scora, Grinstein and Wise model.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.