RECORD
The gravitino abundance in supersymmetric `new' inflation models
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 5 Nov 1999
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim In any case, the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation exceeds the abundance from thermal collisions in a significant regime of parameter space, leading to tighter cosmological constraints.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We consider the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation, in a class of `new' inflation models for which global supersymmetry is a good approximation. Immediately after inflation, gravitinos are produced, with number density determined by equations recently presented by Kallosh et. al. (hep-th/9907124) and Giudice et. al. (hep-ph/9907510). Unless reheating intervenes, creation may continue, maintaining about the same number density, until the Hubble parameter falls below the gravitino mass. In any case, the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation exceeds the abundance from thermal collisions in a significant regime of parameter space, leading to tighter cosmological constraints.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We consider the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation, in a class of `new' inflation models for which global supersymmetry is a good approximation. | contribution 0.87 | 0.56 | 0.05 | unclear 0.51 |
| s1 | Immediately after inflation, gravitinos are produced, with number density determined by equations recently presented by Kallosh et. al. | method 0.51 | 0.14 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | (hep-th/9907124) and Giudice et. al. (hep-ph/9907510). | background 0.61 | 0.03 | 0.02 | unclear 0.79 |
| s3 | Unless reheating intervenes, creation may continue, maintaining about the same number density, until the Hubble parameter falls below the gravitino mass. | result 0.78 | 0.34 | 0.07 | hedged possibility 0.97 |
| s4 | In any case, the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation exceeds the abundance from thermal collisions in a significant regime of parameter space, leading to tighter cosmological constraints. | result 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.86 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We consider the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation, in a class of `new' inflation models for which global supersymmetry is a good approximation. Immediately after inflation, gravitinos are produced, with number density determined by equations recently presented by Kallosh et. al. (hep-th/9907124) and Giudice et. al. (hep-ph/9907510). Unless reheating intervenes, creation may continue, maintaining about the same number density, until the Hubble parameter falls below the gravitino mass. In any case, the abundance of gravitinos created from the vacuum fluctuation exceeds the abundance from thermal collisions in a significant regime of parameter space, leading to tighter cosmological constraints.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Papers citing it
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
In the context of the gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking scenario, a different production mechanism is used [ref] [See also [ref] for various works on gravitino production and DM.].
Gravitino Thermal Production, Dark Matter, and Reheating of the Universe · Introduction · 0.85
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.