Pith. Sign in

RECORD

NLO Program Comparison for Event Shapes

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
G.J. McCance

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 22 Dec 1999

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The predictions of two next-to-leading order programs are compared for current jet thrust, current jet-broadening, C parameter and jet-mass in deep inelastic scattering.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-ph/9912481 (version 1)
Pith IDEHJYCC6R, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationG.J. McCance. "NLO Program Comparison for Event Shapes." arXiv:hep-ph/9912481 (1999). https://pith.science/paper/EHJYCC6R
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,272 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The analysis of event shape variables enable studies of QCD and determinations of alpha-s, but require predictions to next-to-leading order. The predictions of two next-to-leading order programs are compared for current jet thrust, current jet-broadening, C parameter and jet-mass in deep inelastic scattering.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The analysis of event shape variables enable studies of QCD and determinations of alpha-s, but require predictions to next-to-leading order. background 1.00 0.06 0.06 asserted 1.00
s1 The predictions of two next-to-leading order programs are compared for current jet thrust, current jet-broadening, C parameter and jet-mass in deep inelastic scattering. contribution 0.96 0.83 0.17 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.89 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The analysis of event shape variables enable studies of QCD and determinations of alpha-s, but require predictions to next-to-leading order. The predictions of two next-to-leading order programs are compared for current jet thrust, current jet-broadening, C parameter and jet-mass in deep inelastic scattering.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.