An Early Proposal of "Brane World"

Keiichi Akama

REVIEW

An Early Proposal of "Brane World"

Keiichi Akama

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 19 Jan 2000 · 5 references

Pith's verdict: The 1982 origin paper for the brane-world idea, reposted in 2000: the structural argument holds up, but the one number that matters, Eq. 29, is never evaluated.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 4 major objections · 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0001113 (version 1)

Pith IDUIMGRJGO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationKeiichi Akama. "An Early Proposal of "Brane World"." arXiv:hep-th/0001113 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/UIMGRJGO

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Short version: this is the origin paper for the brane-world picture, a 1982 conference proceedings reposted to arXiv in 2000 with a cover note that says so plainly. Read it as a historical document and it is good. Read it as a derivation and there is one real gap, in the sign of Eq. 29. The move is the thing worth crediting. Instead of compactifying the extra dimensions, Akama localizes our four-dimensional spacetime as the core of a Nielsen-Olesen vortex in six flat dimensions. The vortex center becomes a collective coordinate, its fluctuations give a massless four-dimensional graviton, and Sakharov-style vacuum polarization generates the Einstein-Hilbert term. That is the modern brane-world program in five pages, well before the papers usually cited for it. The tools are used correctly: Forster and Gervais-Sakita for the collective-coordinate quantization, Sakharov for the induced gravity, and the author is upfront that the one-loop coefficients are cutoff- and gauge-dependent. Now the soft spot, and it is the load-bearing one. Eq. 29 writes 1/16πG as a sum of bosonic one-loop coefficients, N0β0 + N1β1 + βc, times Λ². Nothing in the paper shows that combination is positive. For a purely bosonic spectrum there is no reason it should be, and if it comes out negative the model predicts anti-gravity and the central claim fails outright. The author flags the cutoff and gauge dependence but never the sign. Magnitude is the second worry: conclusion item 4 puts the cutoff at the inverse vortex size and remarks it may sit well below the Planck mass, which through Eq. 29 gives a Newton constant far from the observed one unless the vortex is tuned to the Planck length. Conclusion item 3, the induced internal symmetries, is asserted rather than derived. Two places where I would push back on the reader's report. The 'easily checked' general covariance is not hand-waving; it is the standard collective-coordinate result of ref [3]. And the decoupling worry is partly answered by Eq. 23, where the extra-dimensional modes sit at mass of order sqrt(a). Who should read it: anyone citing the origin of the brane-world idea, and students who want to see it before it had a name. It deserves referee time on the strength of the content, though as a reposted proceedings there is formally nothing new to referee.

Referee report

Significance

The proposal is conceptually important and, for 1982, early: it offers a concrete alternative to compactification for hiding extra dimensions, and it does so with a specific, analyzable dynamics rather than a kinematic ansatz. The construction is parameter-free in the sense that the vortex scale, the four-dimensional Newton constant, and the cosmological term are all tied to the same set of Lagrangian parameters (a, b, e, n) and the cutoff, so the framework makes structural predictions rather than fitting data. Two of the concluding items are genuinely falsifiable in principle: the statement that particles above a threshold penetrate the extra dimensions (item 5) and that the vortex spreads out at high temperature or density (item 6). The collective-coordinate treatment follows the established Forster and Gervais-Sakita line (ref. [3]) and the induced-gravity mechanism follows Sakharov (ref. [1]); the paper's own contribution is the synthesis. The derivation is analytic and, in principle, reproducible, though no explicit evaluation of the coefficients in Eq. (29) is carried out here.

Major objections (4)

[Eq. (29) and the paragraph preceding it] The quantitative heart of the induced-gravity claim is 1/16πG = (N0β0 + N1β1 + βc)Λ², but the manuscript never establishes the sign of the combination N0β0 + N1β1 + βc for the spectrum that actually appears in Eq. (23). The author acknowledges that α0, α1, β0, β1 'depend on the cut-off-method and even on gauge,' which is a fair caveat about their values, but the sign of the total is a separate and more basic question: for a purely bosonic spectrum of scalars and vectors, with possible negative modes in the vortex background, the sum is not sign-definite, and a negative value would give G < 0, i.e. anti-gravity, which would contradict conclusion 1. A concrete test is available within the paper's own framework: compute β0, β1 and βc explicitly for the bound-state and continuum spectrum defined by Eq. (23), state whether the vortex background admits negative modes, and report the sign of the resulting 1/G. Without that, the central claim that Einstein gravity is induced is established only up to an uncomputed sign.
[Eq. (29) versus conclusion 4] Conclusion 4 states that the ultraviolet divergences 'should be cut off at the inverse of the size of the vortex, which may be much smaller than the Planck mass,' but Eq. (29) ties the cutoff directly to the observed Newton constant through 1/16πG = (N0β0 + N1β1 + βc)Λ². If Λ is much below the Planck mass, then 1/G is much below its observed value unless N0 and N1 (the numbers of bound states in Eq. (23)) are correspondingly enormous, which the paper does not argue. The manuscript should state explicitly what relation between the vortex size and the Planck length is required by Eq. (29), and whether the required hierarchy is natural in the model or is a fine-tuning. As written, conclusion 4 and Eq. (29) pull in opposite directions.
[Eqs. (27)-(29)] The same one-loop calculation induces not only the Einstein term but also a cosmological term λ = ∫L0 dx5dx6 + (N0α0 + N1α1 + αc)Λ⁴, so that the model predicts λ ~ (1/G)Λ² up to the classical vortex contribution. With Λ at or above the vortex scale √a, this is an enormous cosmological constant, and the paper does not confront it. Since the induced λ and the induced 1/G share the same cutoff, the ratio λ/(1/G) is a parameter-free prediction of the model and should be stated and compared with observation, or at least flagged as an open problem of the construction. This is not a presentational point: it bears on whether the low-energy effective theory on the vortex is four-dimensional Einstein gravity at all.
[Text following Eq. (13)] The claim that 'It is easily checked that the action is invariant under the general coordinate transformation of the curved four-spacetime' is asserted rather than shown, and it carries conclusion 1. The collective-coordinate method itself is supported by refs. [3], but the general covariance of the full object in Eq. (9) is not automatic: the path integral contains the gauge-fixing insertion δ(∂_M A^M) in Eq. (6), the constraint insertion of Eq. (7) with the measure ∏_{X//} dY^M, and the δ(C̃^M) factors, and it should be stated which of these are manifestly covariant on the world-volume and which require a compensating transformation. The manuscript should identify precisely which step is taken from refs. [3] and which is new here, so that a reader can tell what is being claimed versus what is being cited.

Minor objections (8)

[Eqs. (9)-(11)] Eq. (9) contains the combination L0 + L1, but the text then defines L0 in Eq. (10) and L2 in Eq. (11); L1 is never defined. Presumably L1 in Eq. (9) should read L2, but the notation should be made consistent.
[Eq. (22)] The two displayed lines of Eq. (22) carry the same left-hand side, [(ΔV0)^{-1}]^{μν}; the second line should presumably be the scalar propagator [(ΔS0)^{-1}]^{ab}. As printed, the equation is ambiguous about which propagator is being given.
[Eqs. (18)-(19)] The nonlocal operator δm in Eq. (19) enters Eq. (18) with indices m11, m12, m21, m22, but the index structure and the meaning of the collective-coordinate source wm are not explained. A short paragraph spelling out the 4x4 block structure of Δ and the role of wm would make the one-loop computation checkable.
[Eq. (6)] The gauge-fixing factor δ(∂_M A^M) is inserted into the path integral without the corresponding ghost determinant. At one loop this may not affect the coefficient of R, but the manuscript should say so explicitly rather than leave the omission implicit.
[Text following Eq. (13)] The decoupling argument, 'outside the vortex, any low energy fields are suppressed because of the high barrier of |φ0|²,' is qualitative. The mass gap of Eq. (23) does most of the work, so the paper would be strengthened by stating the effective-theory cutoff (presumably √a) and the order of the leading four-dimensional operators suppressed by powers of √a.
[Conclusion 3] The claim that two kinds of internal symmetries are induced, 'the former somewhat like isospin, while the latter, generation,' is stated without any supporting calculation in the text. Either a sketch of the mechanism should be given or the item should be explicitly labelled as a conjecture.
[Introduction and throughout] The TeX-typeset version retains numerous spacing artifacts from the original typesetting, for example 'sage' for 'stage', 'clear ly', 'in vestigations', 'fu ndamental', 'spac etime', 'dimens ions', 'gr avity', and 'equ ation'. Since this is presented as a cleaned TeX version, these should be corrected.
[Eqs. (2) and (5)] The vortex ansatz A_M = ε_{0123MN} A(r) X^N/r and the winding-number phase e^{inθ} are introduced without stating the normalization of e, the allowed values of n, or the metric signature, which appears only later in Eq. (20). A brief statement at first use would help.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Our four-dimensional world may be a vortex — a localized soliton — inside a flat six-dimensional spacetime, with Einstein gravity emerging from quantum fluctuations of the vortex rather than being assumed at the outset.

The reading

Akama asks why physical laws are generally covariant instead of assuming they are, and answers with a picture: the four-dimensional spacetime we inhabit is a vortex-like object living in a flat six-dimensional space, much as a Nielsen-Olesen flux tube lives in a superconductor. Only special relativity is put in by hand at the six-dimensional level; general covariance on the vortex then follows because the low-energy fields are trapped inside it and see an effective curved four-dimensional geometry. The Einstein action itself is not inserted but induced, in the manner of Sakharov's pregeometry, by vacuum polarization loops cut off at a scale $Λ$ set by the vortex thickness, giving $1/16πG = (N_0β_0 + N_1β_1 + β_c)Λ^2$. The payoff, if it holds, is a way to hide extra dimensions without compactifying them: the extra space is not small and curled up but simply empty of low-energy matter, because the vortex wall is a barrier.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Nielsen-Olesen vortex in six dimensions, used as a dynamical four-dimensional brane. Its thickness $ε = 1/√a$ sets both the barrier that traps low-energy fields and the ultraviolet cutoff $Λ$ on the fluctuation loops. The collective-coordinate trick — inserting a delta function that fixes the vortex center of mass $C^M(ξ^μ)$ and integrating over the four embedding functions $Y^M(ξ^μ)$ — converts the six-dimensional path integral into a four-dimensional one with an induced metric. Expanding the one-loop effective action $S_{eff} = (i/2)Tr ln Δ + …$ in the metric fluctuation $h_{MN}$ and the collective coordinate $w^m$, and keeping the quartically and quadratically divergent pieces, yields the induced cosmological term and the induced $1/16πG$ of Eq. (29).

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that general relativity on four-dimensional spacetime is an output rather than a premise. Starting from a Higgs-plus-gauge Lagrangian in six flat dimensions, the author takes the Nielsen-Olesen vortex solution, promotes the position of the vortex core to a collective coordinate $Y^M(ξ^μ)$, and rewrites the theory in curvilinear coordinates adapted to the vortex. Inside the core the induced metric on the four-dimensional world is curved while the two transverse directions stay flat to leading order, so observers confined to the core see a curved four-dimensional spacetime and laws invariant under its general coordinate transformations. Quantizing the small fluctuations around the vortex and regulating the resulting one-loop diagrams with a momentum cutoff $Λ$ much larger than $√a$ produces, among the divergent terms, precisely an Einstein-Hilbert piece $∫√(-g)(λ + R/16πG)d^4x$, with $1/16πG$ proportional to $Λ^2$ times a sum of $O(1)$ coefficients from bound and continuum states. The author lists the consequences he draws: general covariance is explained rather than postulated, gravity is induced as in Sakharov's pregeometry, two kinds of internal symmetry appear (translation in the extra space and excitation of the vortex, loosely isospin-like and generation-like), the ultraviolet cutoff for quantized gravity is the inverse vortex size, sufficiently energetic particles can penetrate the extra dimensions, and at very high temperature or density the vortex spreads out and the higher-dimensional spacetime becomes visible.

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the low-energy world on the vortex to be exactly four-dimensional Einstein gravity, which requires the two transverse field components and the vortex's shape oscillations to decouple below the vortex scale; the paper asserts this from the height of the $|φ_0|^2$ barrier without a quantitative decoupling argument.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

General covariance on the four-dimensional world is derived from the shape dynamics of a soliton, not assumed as a starting principle.
Newton's constant is a calculable product of the cutoff and one-loop coefficients, $1/16πG = (N_0β_0 + N_1β_1 + β_c)Λ^2$, rather than a free input.
The ultraviolet behavior of quantized gravity is regulated by the finite vortex thickness, which the author suggests may let the theory bypass the standard renormalizability problem.
Extra dimensions are hidden dynamically, by the energy barrier of the vortex wall, instead of by compactification.
Above a threshold energy, or at very high temperature or density, the vortex spreads out and the six-dimensional spacetime is revealed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the same cutoff $Λ$ fixes both the induced cosmological term and the induced Newton constant in Eq. (29), the model ties the vacuum energy and $G$ to a common scale; that link is a sharper prediction than either quantity alone and is not worked out in the paper.
The vortex thickness plays the role of a physical short-distance cutoff, so the picture implies a maximum energy at which four-dimensional physics is still a good description — a threshold that collider searches for heavy graviton-like or extra-dimensional recoil states could in principle constrain.
The author's remark that translation and excitation modes of the vortex resemble isospin and generation symmetries suggests reading the vortex zero-mode spectrum as a precursor of family structure; that connection is asserted in one line and left undeveloped.
The 2000 cover note frames the reissue as an accessibility measure, not a scientific revision, so the paper's standing depends on how the later brane-world literature treated the dynamical-localization route it proposes.

Original abstract

Here we place the TeX-typeset version of the old preprint SMC-PHYS-66 (1982), which was published in K. Akama, "Pregeometry", in Lecture Notes in Physics, 176, Gauge Theory and Gravitation, Proceedings, Nara, 1982, edited by K. Kikkawa, N. Nakanishi and H. Nariai, (Springer-Verlag) 267--271. In the paper, we presented the picture that we live in a "brane world" (in the present-day terminology) i.e. in a dynamically localized 3-brane in a higher dimensional space. We adopt, as an example, the dynamics of the Nielsen-Olesen vortex type in six dimensional spacetime to localize our space-time within a 3-brane. At low energies, everything is trapped in the 3-brane, and the Einstein gravity is induced through the fluctuations of the 3-brane. The idea is important because it provides a way basically distinct from the "compactification" to hide the extra dimensions which become necessary for various theoretical reasons.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,688 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.60 · mentions code or data availability 0.11.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Here we place the TeX-typeset version of the old preprint SMC-PHYS-66 (1982), which was published in K. Akama, "Pregeometry", in Lecture Notes in Physics, 176, Gauge Theory and Gravitation, Proceedings, Nara, 1982, edited by K. Kikkawa, N. Nakanishi and H. Nariai, (Springer-Verlag) 267--271. In the paper, we presented the picture that we live in a "brane world" (in the present-day terminology) i.e. in a dynamically localized 3-brane in a higher dimensional space. We adopt, as an example, the dynamics of the Nielsen-Olesen vortex type in six dimensional spacetime to localize our space-time within a 3-brane. At low energies, everything is trapped in the 3-brane, and the Einstein gravity is induced through the fluctuations of the 3-brane. The idea is important because it provides a way basically distinct from the "compactification" to hide the extra dimensions which become necessary for various theoretical reasons.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Here we place the TeX-typeset version of the old preprint SMC-PHYS-66 (1982), which was published in K.	background 0.90	0.24	0.02	asserted 0.83
s1	Akama, "Pregeometry", in Lecture Notes in Physics, 176, Gauge Theory and Gravitation, Proceedings, Nara, 1982, edited by K. Kikkawa, N. Nakanishi and H.	background 0.98	0.06	0.02	unclear 0.79
s2	Nariai, (Springer-Verlag) 267--271.	background 0.98	0.06	0.02	unclear 0.85
s3	In the paper, we presented the picture that we live in a "brane world" (in the present-day terminology) i.e. in a dynamically localized 3-brane in a higher dimensional space.	contribution 0.98	0.76	0.65	asserted 0.99
s4	We adopt, as an example, the dynamics of the Nielsen-Olesen vortex type in six dimensional spacetime to localize our space-time within a 3-brane.	method 0.97	0.68	0.10	asserted 0.87
s5	At low energies, everything is trapped in the 3-brane, and the Einstein gravity is induced through the fluctuations of the 3-brane.	result 0.81	0.66	0.37	asserted 1.00
s6	The idea is important because it provides a way basically distinct from the "compactification" to hide the extra dimensions which become necessary for various theoretical reasons.	interpretation 0.99	0.15	0.26	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.86 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.77.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (5)

[3]

D. F¨ orster, Nucl. Phys. B81 (1974) 84; J. L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Nucl. Phys. B91 (1975) 301

View on Pith 1974
[1]

A. D. Sakharov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 177 (1967) 70; Theor. Mate. Fiz. 23 (1975) 23; K. Akama, Y. Chikashige, T. Matsuki and H. Terazawa, Prog. Theo r. Phys. 60 (1978) 868; K. Akama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 60 (1978) 1900; For a review, S. L. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 729

View on Pith 1967
[2]

H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 45

View on Pith 1973
[4]

K. Akama, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 3073

View on Pith 1981
[5]

K. Akama and H. Terazawa, Gen. Relat. Grav. to be published. 5 5 Note added in January , 2000: K. Akama and H. Terazawa, Gen. Relat. Grav. 15 (1983) 201. 5

View on Pith 1983

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Black holes on the brane
hep-th 2000-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The Reissner-Nordstrom metric is an exact solution of the effective brane-world Einstein equations, describing a black hole with a tidal charge from the bulk instead of electric charge.
Matter Swapping between Two Branes: A Local Type IIB D3--D7--D3 Mechanism for Charged-Fermion Mixing via E3 Instantons
hep-th 2026-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A local D3+-D7-D3-/E3 Type IIB construction generates the charged-fermion mixing operator characteristic of two-sheeted braneworlds, with the mixing coefficient becoming computable from microscopic string data in a co...
Quasinormal Ringing of de Sitter Braneworlds
gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Thin and thick de Sitter braneworlds have discrete, purely imaginary quasinormal frequencies for gravitational perturbations, with decay rates set by the Hubble constant and, for thick branes, by the brane width parameter.
Thick brane solution in the presence of two interacting scalar fields
gr-qc 2006-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A new 5D thick brane solution is found numerically using two interacting scalar fields with a potential that has local and global minima, and the solution traps electromagnetic and spinor fields on the brane.
Vacuum Polarization Effects on Flat Branes due to a Global Monopole
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For a massless scalar field in a global monopole braneworld, the renormalized field fluctuation <Φ²> vanishes at leading order for p=2 and p=4 flat branes and is nonzero for p=3, with explicit formulas in terms of cur...

Show 12 more citing papers

Fermion generations, masses and mixings in a 6D brane model
hep-th 2006-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A single 6D Dirac fermion in a non-singular warped brane background can have exactly three normalizable zero modes (angular momentum l=0, ±1), and a Yukawa coupling to a bulk scalar can be tuned to mimic observed ferm...
Localising gravity in composite monopole brane worlds without bulk cosmological constant
hep-th 2006-03 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

A strong direct coupling between the local and global monopole sectors generates an effective negative bulk cosmological constant, yielding gravity-localising solutions without an explicit cosmological constant in the action.
Generalised Israel Junction Conditions for a Gauss-Bonnet Brane World
hep-th 2002-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Varying a Gauss-Bonnet action with the Myers boundary term yields junction conditions for a thin brane, and the resulting Friedmann equation agrees with two groups and contradicts two others.
Two-scalar-field $f(R)$ Thick Branes, Gravitational Resonances and Quasinormal Modes
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

In ghost-free two-scalar f(R) thick branes, internal structure produces no narrow real-axis tensor resonances; quasinormal modes are broad with quality factors 0.9-1.9.
Investigating the interplay of the braneworld gravity and the plasma environment on the black hole shadow
gr-qc 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

Negative tidal charge enlarges the shadow of rotating braneworld black holes while inhomogeneous plasma shrinks it and homogeneous plasma enlarges it; EHT data limits q to roughly -1.15 to 0.45 for M87* in the low-den...
Matter localization and resonant deconfinement in a two-sheeted spacetime
hep-th 2006-03 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

In a two-sheeted spacetime model, environmental interactions, chiefly gravity, localize fermions on one sheet, and resonant transfer to the other sheet becomes possible at a matching frequency.
Brane-World Gravity
hep-th 2010-04 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Brane-world models recover four-dimensional gravity at low energies while predicting calculable, testable corrections at high energies, and this review consolidates their geometry, cosmology, and observational status.
Large and infinite extra dimensions
hep-ph 2001-04 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

A pedagogical survey of brane-world models in which extra dimensions are large or infinite, covering how matter is trapped on a brane and what observable signatures large, warped or infinite extra dimensions would produce.
Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations
hep-th 2009-09 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

Quintom dark energy, in which the equation of state crosses w = -1, is reviewed as an observationally motivated but theoretically challenging extension of standard cosmology.
Thick brane solutions
gr-qc 2009-04 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

The review catalogues exact thick-brane solutions of multidimensional gravity, classifies them by topology, and summarizes how cosmological equations are recovered on a brane of finite width.
Introduction to Extra Dimensions and Thick Braneworlds
hep-th 2017-07 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

The paper surveys extra-dimension and thick-braneworld models, organizing known solutions and localization results into a single pedagogical review.
TASI Lectures on Extra Dimensions and Branes
hep-ph 2004-04 accept novelty 1.0 of 10

A pedagogical survey of brane and extra-dimension model building, covering large flat dimensions, split fermions, gaugino mediation, orbifold symmetry breaking, and the Randall-Sundrum warped solution with its gravito...

How the literature uses it

85 arXiv papers cite this in 101 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 18 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 75 papers

More recently however, the braneworld paradigm, [ref] , has allowed for extra dimensions to be much larger, hidden instead by a confinement mechanism, [ref] , which localizes standard model physics on the brane but allows gravity to probe the bulk.

The effect of extra dimensions on gravity wave bursts from cosmic string cusps · Introduction · 0.95
At long wavelengths, the dynamics of the Nambu-Goldstone boson fields $ϕ^i (x)$ associated with the spontaneous breakdown of translation invariance of the bulk due to an oscillating brane world [ref] can be described by a nonlinear sigma model effective action [ref] .

Colliders and Brane Vector Phenomenology · Introduction · 0.92
However, recent developments of superstring theory invented a new idea, the so-called braneworldbraneworld where matter resides on the hypersurface in higher dimensional spacetime [ref] ( see also earlier independent works [ref] ).

AdS/CFT on the brane · Introduction · 0.90

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [3]

D. F¨ orster, Nucl. Phys. B81 (1974) 84; J. L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Nucl. Phys. B91 (1975) 301

View on Pith 1974

[2] [1]

A. D. Sakharov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 177 (1967) 70; Theor. Mate. Fiz. 23 (1975) 23; K. Akama, Y. Chikashige, T. Matsuki and H. Terazawa, Prog. Theo r. Phys. 60 (1978) 868; K. Akama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 60 (1978) 1900; For a review, S. L. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54 (1982) 729

View on Pith 1967

[3] [2]

H. B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 45

View on Pith 1973

[4] [4]

K. Akama, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 3073

View on Pith 1981

[5] [5]

K. Akama and H. Terazawa, Gen. Relat. Grav. to be published. 5 5 Note added in January , 2000: K. Akama and H. Terazawa, Gen. Relat. Grav. 15 (1983) 201. 5

View on Pith 1983