Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Flux tube solutions in noncommutative gauge theories

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 6 Jul 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We derive nonperturbative classical solutions of noncommutative U(1) gauge theory, with or without a Higgs field, representing static magnetic flux tubes with arbitrary cross-section.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0007043 (version 2)
Pith ID67T6PO4V, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlexios P. Polychronakos. "Flux tube solutions in noncommutative gauge theories." arXiv:hep-th/0007043 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/67T6PO4V
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,512 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.11 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.22 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We derive nonperturbative classical solutions of noncommutative U(1) gauge theory, with or without a Higgs field, representing static magnetic flux tubes with arbitrary cross-section. The fields are nonperturbatively different from the vacuum in at least some region of space. The flux of these tubes is quantized in natural units. We also point out that magnetic monopole charge can be fractionized by embedding the monopoles in a constant magnetic field.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We derive nonperturbative classical solutions of noncommutative U(1) gauge theory, with or without a Higgs field, representing static magnetic flux tubes with arbitrary cross-section. contribution 0.92 0.96 0.75 asserted 1.00
s1 The fields are nonperturbatively different from the vacuum in at least some region of space. result 0.98 0.83 0.14 asserted 0.90
s2 The flux of these tubes is quantized in natural units. result 1.00 0.82 0.18 asserted 1.00
s3 We also point out that magnetic monopole charge can be fractionized by embedding the monopoles in a constant magnetic field. result 0.80 0.77 0.13 asserted 0.78

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We derive nonperturbative classical solutions of noncommutative U(1) gauge theory, with or without a Higgs field, representing static magnetic flux tubes with arbitrary cross-section. The fields are nonperturbatively different from the vacuum in at least some region of space. The flux of these tubes is quantized in natural units. We also point out that magnetic monopole charge can be fractionized by embedding the monopoles in a constant magnetic field.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 11 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 3 papers
Cites it as background 3 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.