Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Non-Semisimple Gaugings of D=5 N=8 Supergravity and FDA.s

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
L. Andrianopoli, F. Cordaro, P. Fre', L. Gualtieri

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 7 Sep 2000

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim This enables us to explicitly construct the non-compact gaugings corresponding to the non--semisimple algebras CSO(p,q,r), irrespectively from the existence of a lagrangian.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0009048 (version 2)
Pith IDMZ6U7AUW, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationF. Cordaro, L. Andrianopoli, L. Gualtieri, P. Fre'. "Non-Semisimple Gaugings of D=5 N=8 Supergravity and FDA.s." arXiv:hep-th/0009048 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/MZ6U7AUW
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,004 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.19 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.89 · compares with prior results 0.35 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We reformulate maximal D=5 supergravity in the consistent approach uniquely based on Free Differential Algebras and the solution of their Bianchi identities (= rheonomic method). In this approach the lagrangian is unnecessary since the field equations follow from closure of the supersymmetry algebra. This enables us to explicitly construct the non-compact gaugings corresponding to the non--semisimple algebras CSO(p,q,r), irrespectively from the existence of a lagrangian. The use of Free Differential Algebras is essential to clarify, within a cohomological set up, the dualization mechanism between one-forms and two-forms. Our theories contain 12-r self-dual two-forms and 15+r gauge vectors, r of which are abelian and neutral. These theories, whose existence is proved and their supersymmetry algebra constructed hereby, have potentially interesting properties in relation with domain wall solutions and the trapping of gravity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We reformulate maximal D=5 supergravity in the consistent approach uniquely based on Free Differential Algebras and the solution of their Bianchi identities (= rheonomic method). contribution 0.56 0.91 0.13 asserted 1.00
s1 In this approach the lagrangian is unnecessary since the field equations follow from closure of the supersymmetry algebra. method 0.78 0.48 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 This enables us to explicitly construct the non-compact gaugings corresponding to the non--semisimple algebras CSO(p,q,r), irrespectively from the existence of a lagrangian. contribution 0.80 0.93 0.47 asserted 1.00
s3 The use of Free Differential Algebras is essential to clarify, within a cohomological set up, the dualization mechanism between one-forms and two-forms. method 0.73 0.60 0.08 asserted 1.00
s4 Our theories contain 12-r self-dual two-forms and 15+r gauge vectors, r of which are abelian and neutral. result 0.98 0.89 0.13 asserted 1.00
s5 These theories, whose existence is proved and their supersymmetry algebra constructed hereby, have potentially interesting properties in relation with domain wall solutions and the trapping of gravity. interpretation 0.97 0.82 0.31 hedged possibility 0.95

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.96 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We reformulate maximal D=5 supergravity in the consistent approach uniquely based on Free Differential Algebras and the solution of their Bianchi identities (= rheonomic method). In this approach the lagrangian is unnecessary since the field equations follow from closure of the supersymmetry algebra. This enables us to explicitly construct the non-compact gaugings corresponding to the non--semisimple algebras CSO(p,q,r), irrespectively from the existence of a lagrangian. The use of Free Differential Algebras is essential to clarify, within a cohomological set up, the dualization mechanism between one-forms and two-forms. Our theories contain 12-r self-dual two-forms and 15+r gauge vectors, r of which are abelian and neutral. These theories, whose existence is proved and their supersymmetry algebra constructed hereby, have potentially interesting properties in relation with domain wall solutions and the trapping of gravity.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

References
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.