Boundary Liouville Field Theory: Boundary Three Point Function

B.Ponsot; J.Teschner

REVIEW

Boundary Liouville Field Theory: Boundary Three Point Function

B.Ponsot, J.Teschner

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 26 Oct 2001 · 18 references

Pith's verdict: The boundary three-point function of Liouville theory, with real cross-checks and two honestly stated gaps: uniqueness only for irrational b under a meromorphicity assumption, and the bulk-boundary Cardy-Lewellen conditions left unverified.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 13, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 7 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0110244 (version 2)

Pith IDDG4D3WCM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationB.Ponsot, J.Teschner. "Boundary Liouville Field Theory: Boundary Three Point Function." arXiv:hep-th/0110244 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/DG4D3WCM

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The thing to know: this is where the boundary three-point function of Liouville theory comes from, and formula (28) has held up. The new content is the function g in (26) and the closed form in (28). The factorization structure in (22) is credited to Runkel and to unpublished Teschner, and the fusion coefficients are the authors' own earlier work [11,12]. What this paper actually does is fix the normalization and check it hard, and that is the part worth reading. Credit where due: the checks are real. The ansatz solves the associativity condition (21) through the pentagon identity, and the c- residue computed from the ansatz matches the free-field expression (27); the paper notes the two routes agree if and only if the prefactor in (26) is the one chosen. That is an independent cross-check, not a consistency tautology. The reflection amplitude (14) and the two-point function (17) come back out correctly. On the reader's flagged weak point, I would push back. The residue c+ = 1 at beta1+beta2+beta3 = Q is a normalization statement, not a dynamical input: with the normalization fixed by (17) the free-field correlator gives exactly 1, and the c- match confirms the prefactor separately. That concern does not land. What does land is narrower. Appendix C's uniqueness argument runs only for irrational b and under the meromorphicity assumption the authors themselves call far-reaching in section 3(ii). If C picks up non-perturbative structure in the betas, the difference equations admit extra solutions and (28) is one candidate among several rather than the three-point function. Separately, section 4 is explicit that the Cardy-Lewellen conditions tying (28) to the bulk-boundary coefficient R(alpha,beta|sigma) of [10] are not verified. So (28) is a strong candidate, not a theorem, and the authors say so; I would hold them to that rather than treat the matter as closed. Minor point: [12] is listed as to appear, but [14] reports the fusion coefficients confirmed by direct calculation, so that is not load-bearing. Who should read it: anyone computing boundary Liouville correlators, or working on non-rational boundary CFT where this is the template. It deserves a serious referee, because the gaps are stated rather than hidden and the checks are the kind a referee can redo.

Referee report

Significance

If correct, this is a valuable and timely result: it supplies the last of the structure functions needed to characterize boundary Liouville theory, with direct applications to noncritical string theory, two-dimensional gravity, D-brane physics, and to the SL(2)/U(1) WZNW models. The formula is explicit and closed-form, and it passes several nontrivial and largely independent checks (reflection amplitude, two-point limit, cyclic symmetry, and the c- residue match). The rewriting in Eqs. (31)-(35) as a modified b-Racah-Wigner coefficient is a genuinely useful structural observation, since it points toward a categorical interpretation of the boundary structure constants along the lines of [7]. The paper is also honest about what it has not verified, which is a strength rather than a weakness.

Major objections (2)

[Section 4, concluding paragraph] The sentence 'We now have determined the last of the structure functions that one needs to completely characterize Liouville theory on domains with boundary' is stronger than what the paper establishes. The authors themselves state two paragraphs later that the Cardy-Lewellen conditions linking the boundary three-point function (28) with the bulk-boundary coefficient R(alpha,beta|sigma) of [10] have not been verified. Since the completeness claim is the headline of the conclusion, it should be softened to something like 'the last structure function for which an explicit proposal was missing', or the precise unverified condition should be stated in the same sentence. A concrete and feasible check that would go a long way here is the limit in which one boundary operator becomes degenerate, or the beta -> 0 limit relating (28) to R(alpha,beta|sigma); even a single special case would convert the acknowledged gap into a partial verification.
[Section 3(ii) and Section 3(iv), with Appendix C] The uniqueness argument of Section 3(iv) rests on the meromorphicity of C in the beta variables, which the authors themselves call a 'far-reaching assumption' in Section 3(ii), and on irrational b. Appendix C establishes at most two linearly independent solutions of (62) and its b -> 1/b dual, but only under that analyticity input. The consequence is that Eq. (28) is established as a solution of the associativity and reflection constraints, not as the unique such solution, and the text should say so explicitly in Section 3(iv) rather than only in the surrounding discussion. What would materially strengthen the paper is an independent check that does not share the fusion-coefficient machinery, for example the semiclassical b -> 0 limit of (28) compared against the classical Liouville action on the disk with three boundary insertions. Such a check is feasible and would test the formula against a second, independent computational route.

Minor objections (7)

[Eq. (28) versus Eqs. (22) and (26)] The prefactor of (28) is (pi mu gamma(b^2) b^{2-2b^2})^{(beta3-beta2-beta1)/2b}, whereas multiplying the three g-factors of (26) as prescribed by the ansatz (22) would appear to give exponent (beta3+beta2+beta1)/2b. Please state explicitly the prefactor convention for the fusion coefficients used in (22), so that the bookkeeping in (28) can be checked by the reader without consulting [11].
[Eq. (28)] The integral in (28) is written as an integral over the real line, while the fusion coefficient in Section 2 is written as an integral along the imaginary axis. Please state the contour prescription explicitly, in particular whether the contour passes above or below the poles at V_k + is = Q + nb, since the value of the integral depends on this choice.
[Notation, Sections 2 and 3] The symbol S is used for the Liouville spectrum in Eqs. (3) and (12), for the reflection coefficient S(beta; sigma2, sigma1) in Eq. (14), and S_b denotes the double-sine function. This is a genuine source of confusion in Eqs. (20) and (29); a distinct notation for the reflection coefficient would help. In the same vein, Eq. (20) would benefit from an explicit statement that S(beta)S(Q-beta) = 1, which is what makes the definition of C_{beta3|beta2 beta1} invertible.
[Section 3(ii) and Appendix B(iii)] The derivation quotes the pentagon equation (9), the symmetry relations (54)-(57), and the residue formulas of Appendix B(iii) from [12], which is listed as 'to appear'. The paper would be more self-contained if the specific statements used were cited with equation numbers in [12], so that a reader can verify the inputs without reconstructing them.
[Section 3(iii)(a)] The statement that 'the fusion matrix depends on conformal weights only, and is thus invariant when beta_i -> Q - beta_i' is correct but should carry a reference, since it is used to derive the reflection amplitude (14) from (28).
[Abstract and Section 1] The abstract describes the result as an expression 'in terms of the fusion coefficients', but the final formula (28) is an explicit integral representation. A brief rewording of the abstract to reflect that the fusion coefficients enter the derivation while (28) is the explicit answer would better match the content.
[Throughout] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: 'completly' in Section 2, 'meromophic' and 'precisce' in Section 3(ii), and 'theassociativity' in Section 4.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper proposes the missing boundary three-point function for Liouville theory, completing the set of structure constants needed to reconstruct general boundary correlators.

The reading

Liouville theory on a domain with boundary is a two-dimensional conformal field theory whose correlation functions are supposed to be reconstructible from a small set of structure constants. The paper proposes the missing one: an explicit formula for the three-point function of boundary fields. The formula is built from the fusion coefficients that control how conformal blocks change under a change of channel, multiplied by three normalization factors $g$; those factors are fixed by requiring a particular residue to equal $1$, a condition read off from free-field correlation functions. The authors check that the formula reproduces the known boundary reflection amplitude and two-point function, is cyclically symmetric, and is uniquely selected by associativity plus degenerate-field difference equations. If correct, it supplies the last structure constant needed to compute general boundary Liouville correlators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the associativity of the boundary operator product expansion, written as Eq. (21). The ansatz factors the three-point function into a product of three $g$'s times a fusion coefficient; the pentagon equation (9), inherited from the b-Racah-Wigner coefficients, makes this ansatz solve (21) for any $g$. The function $g$ is then pinned down by a first-order finite-difference equation obtained from the degenerate field $��^{-b}$ and the free-field residue $c_+=1$; its solution is Eq. (26). A second difference equation, obtained by replacing $b$ with $1/b$, plus meromorphy and the reflection property, is used to argue that no other solution is possible up to a boundary-parameter-dependent factor, which the residue condition removes.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Eq. (28): the boundary three-point function $C^{�sigma_3�sigma_2�sigma_1}_{�beta_3|�beta_2�beta_1}$ has an explicit closed form in terms of the double gamma function $��_b$, the sine double gamma $S_b$, and a contour integral over four $S_b$ factors. It is obtained from the ansatz $C^{�sigma_3�sigma_2�sigma_1}_{�beta_3|�beta_2�beta_1}=g^{�sigma_3�sigma_1}_{�beta_3}g^{�sigma_3�sigma_2}_{�beta_2}g^{�sigma_2�sigma_1}_{�beta_1}F^{�beta_2}_{�sigma_2�beta_3}[�dots]$, where $F$ is the fusion coefficient with the index pattern of Eq. (22). The pentagon identity for fusion guarantees that this ansatz solves the boundary associativity condition (21); the remaining freedom is fixed by the residue condition $c_+=1$ at $�beta_1+�beta_2+�beta_3=Q$ and by the difference equation coming from inserting the degenerate boundary field $��^{-b}$. The paper then verifies the reflection relation, the $�beta_1�to0$ two-point limit, and cyclic symmetry, and argues uniqueness through a second difference equation with $b�to b^{-1}$.

Load-bearing premise

The normalization is fixed by requiring the residue at $�beta_1+�beta_2+�beta_3=Q$ to equal $1$, a value imported from free-field correlation functions; if that free-field identification is wrong, Eq. (28) is multiplied by an undetermined function of the boundary parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

General boundary four-point functions can be assembled by summing over intermediate boundary states with Eq. (28), giving explicit predictions for Liouville correlators on the disk, half-plane, or strip.
The known boundary reflection amplitude (14) follows from Eq. (28), tying the new normalization to the previously determined boundary two-point function.
The $�beta_1�to0$ limit reproduces the boundary two-point function (17), so the formula passes a nontrivial consistency check at the edge of its kinematic range.
The residue at $�beta_1+�beta_2+�beta_3=Q$ and the cyclic symmetry are built in, matching the pole structure expected from free-field limits.
If the formula is accepted, the list of structure functions for boundary Liouville theory is complete except for the remaining Cardy-Lewellen checks linking boundary and bulk data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A sharp next test is to derive the same normalization from the bulk-boundary crossing condition using the bulk-boundary two-point function of [10]; agreement would confirm the free-field residue input, while a mismatch would reveal a boundary-parameter-dependent factor missed by the ansatz.
The b-Racah-Wigner form suggests the result should be re-derivable from a noncompact quantum-group tensor category without free-field input; such a derivation would explain why the three-point function factorizes into $g$'s times a fusion coefficient.
Because the paper does not verify the full set of Cardy-Lewellen conditions, a numerical check of boundary four-point crossing at irrational $b$ would be a direct falsifier of the complete proposal.
The same pattern may extend to other noncompact conformal field theories with boundary, such as supersymmetric Liouville or SL(2) WZNW models, where the boundary three-point function should again be a product of normalization factors and a fusion coefficient.

Original abstract

Liouville field theory is considered on domains with conformally invariant boundary conditions. We present an explicit expression for the three point function of boundary fields in terms of the fusion coefficients which determine the monodromy properties of the conformal blocks.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,231 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.10 · compares with prior results 0.04 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Liouville field theory is considered on domains with conformally invariant boundary conditions. We present an explicit expression for the three point function of boundary fields in terms of the fusion coefficients which determine the monodromy properties of the conformal blocks.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Liouville field theory is considered on domains with conformally invariant boundary conditions.	background 0.99	0.14	0.04	asserted 0.99
s1	We present an explicit expression for the three point function of boundary fields in terms of the fusion coefficients which determine the monodromy properties of the conformal blocks.	result 0.61	0.94	0.88	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (18)

[10]

K.Hosomichi. “ Bulk-Boundary Propagator in Liouville Theory on a Disc ” hep-th/0108093 Al.B.Zamolodchikov, conference on Liouville ﬁeld theory, Montpellier, january 1998, unpublished

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[12]

B.Ponsot and J.Teschner. “ Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefﬁcients for a contin- uous series of representations of Uq(sl(2, R))”, math-qa/0007097, to appear in CMP

View on Pith
[14]

J.Teschner “ Liouville theory revisited”, hep-th/0104158

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[7]

G.Felder, J.Fr¨ ohlich, J.Fuchs and C.Schweigert. “ Conformal boundary conditions and three dimensional topological ﬁeld theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett 84(2000) 1659-1662; preprint hep-th/9912239

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[1]

E.W.Barnes. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 196 (1901) 265-388

View on Pith 1901
[2]

R. Behrend, P. Pearce, V . Petkova, J.-B. Zuber:Nucl. Phys. B570 (2000) 525-589

View on Pith 2000
[3]

J. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B324 (1989) 581; J. Cardy, D. Lewellen, Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 274; D. Lewellen, Nucl. Phys. B372 (1992) 654-682

View on Pith 1989
[4]

T.Curtright, C.Thorn. “ Conformally invariant quantization of Liouville theory” Phys.Rev.Lett.48 (1982) 1309

View on Pith 1982
[5]

H.Dorn and H.-J.Otto.” Two and three point functions in Liouville theory ” Nucl.Phys. B429 (1994), 375

View on Pith 1994
[6]

Vl.Dotsenko, V .Fateev. Nucl. Phys. B241 (1984) 333

View on Pith 1984
[8]

G.Moore, N.Seiberg. “ Classical and quantum conformal ﬁeld theory” Comm. Math. Phys 123 (1989) 177-254 [FF] B.L. Feigin, D.B. Fuchs: Representations of the Viraso ro algebra, in: Representations of Lie groups and related topics, eds. A.M. Vershik, D.P. Zhelobenko (Gordon and Breach, London 1990)

View on Pith 1989
[9]

V .Fateev, A.Zamolodchikov and Al.Zamolodchikov. “Boundary Liouville Field Theory. I. Boundary state and Boundary two-point function”, hep-th/0001012. 20

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[11]

B.Ponsot and J.Teschner. “ Louville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group.” hep-th/9911110

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

I.Runkel.” Boundary structure constants for the A series Virasoro minimal models” Nucl. Phys. B549 (1999) 563-578 J.Teschner, unpublished

View on Pith 1999
[15]

J.Teschner. “Remarks on Liouville theory with boundary”, hep-th/0009138

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[16]

A.B.Zamolodchikov and Al.B.Zamolodchikov. “Structure constants and conformal boot- strap in Liouville ﬁeld theory” Nucl.Phys. B477 (1996), 577

View on Pith 1996
[17]

E.W. Barnes: Theory of the double gamma function, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A196 (1901) 265–388

View on Pith 1901
[18]

T. Shintani: On a Kronecker limit formula for real quadratic ﬁelds , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 1A Math. 24 (1977) 167–199

View on Pith 1977

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Boundary $c\leq1$ Liouville CFT from the Bootstrap
hep-th 2026-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

Boundary Liouville CFT at c≤1 is bootstrapped into existence with explicit structure constants and a discrete open-string spectrum consistent with the continuous closed spectrum by open-closed duality.
Conformal field theory from automorphic forms on a quantum group
hep-th 2026-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A compact unitary 2d CFT with c>1 is conjectured to be a von Neumann algebra with two commuting actions of SL+_b(2,R), whose crossing equations are associativity.
QG from SymQRG: AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$ Correspondence as Topological Symmetry-Preserving Quantum RG Flow
hep-th 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A framework called SymQRG identifies 3D quantum gravity as the symmetry-preserving RG flow of 2D CFTs, realized discretely by U_q(SL(2,R)) 6j symbols.
Bootstrapping Boundaries and Branes
hep-th 2021-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

The annulus crossing equation plus unitarity yields universal upper and lower bounds on brane tension in 2d CFTs, with exact saturation proven at central charge 8 and 24.
Loop and surface operators in N=2 gauge theory and Liouville modular geometry
hep-th 2009-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Wilson and 't Hooft loop operators in N=2 quiver gauge theories are identified with Verlinde monodromy operators of Liouville theory, yielding explicit loop expectation values from fusion and braiding matrices.

Show 17 more citing papers

Exact vs. Semiclassical Target Space of the Minimal String
hep-th 2004-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

Nonperturbative effects replace the classical multi-sheeted Riemann surface of (p,q) minimal string theory with the single complex x plane, because the exact FZZT partition function is an entire function that exhibits...
Morse Bridge between Planar Kepler and Hyperbolic Landau Dynamics
hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

The radial Kepler problem and sectors of the hyperbolic Landau problem are mapped to the Morse spectral problem, relating their bound spectra, resonances, and scattering data.
Solving 3d Gravity with Virasoro TQFT
hep-th 2023-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

3d quantum gravity with negative cosmological constant is reformulated as two copies of a Virasoro TQFT, making gravity partition functions on hyperbolic 3-manifolds algorithmically computable.
An integrable road to a perturbative plateau
hep-th 2022-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

In a late-time double-scaling limit, cancellations in intersection numbers cap each genus-g wormhole amplitude of 2d dilaton gravity at T^{2g+1}, so the genus sum converges to the plateau.
Gravity factorized
hep-th 2021-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Adding Gaussian-correlated spacetime branes to JT gravity cancels all wormholes to every order, yielding a factorizing partition function whose spectrum is fixed by the brane one-point function.
Gravity without averaging
hep-th 2021-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Pinning a random-matrix Hamiltonian toward a target matrix deforms the JT gravity dilaton potential and, past a critical pinning strength, drives a phase transition in which macroscopic holes proliferate.
Liouville quantum gravity -- holography, JT and matrices
hep-th 2020-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Fixed-length disk correlators in Liouville gravity are derived explicitly, matched to a dual matrix model for the (2,p) minimal string, shown to reduce to JT gravity at large p, and reorganized into quantum-deformed W...
Crossing Kernels for Boundary and Crosscap CFTs
hep-th 2017-03 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Boundary and crosscap crossing kernels in d-dimensional CFT are shown to be special parameter choices of the one-dimensional SL(2,R) crossing kernel.
Semiclassical limit of the FZZT Liouville theory
hep-th 2006-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The authors prove the Polyakov conjecture for elliptic boundary operators in FZZT Liouville theory and verify the classical action against quantum correlators in four examples.
Rolling Tachyons from Liouville theory
hep-th 2003-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Analytic continuation of the exact c≥25 Liouville solution yields two c=1 theories, a Euclidean one matching Runkel-Watts and a new Lorentzian one for rolling closed-string tachyons.
Strings from Tachyons
hep-th 2003-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The c=1 matrix model is reinterpreted as the worldline quantum mechanics of N unstable D-particles, with a quantitative match between tachyon radiation and eigenvalue radiation, plus a proposed IIB embedding.
Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks
hep-th 2023-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The Virasoro crossing kernels are rederived from Moore-Seiberg consistency plus a difference-Galois uniqueness argument, with the Ponsot-Teschner integral formula recovered as the unique solution.
In search of conformal theories
hep-th 2017-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The conformal crossing equation is recast as the pentagon identity of the conformal group's 6j-symbol, yielding an infinite family of formal solutions labeled by a group representation.
An A_r threesome: Matrix models, 2d CFTs and 4d N=2 gauge theories
hep-th 2009-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The A_r quiver matrix models of Dijkgraaf and Vafa reproduce the chiral three-point functions of A_r Toda theory and the perturbative Nekrasov partition functions of A_r quiver gauge theories, with a speculative q-def...
Conformal field theory on the plane
hep-th 2014-06 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

The paper is a self-contained bootstrap-based review of two-dimensional conformal field theory on the plane, including explicit solutions of Liouville theory and minimal models.
Minimal String Theory
hep-th 2004-09 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Minimal string theory is organized by a Riemann surface whose periods give FZZT and ZZ brane amplitudes, and this same surface yields the dual matrix model.
Liouville Field Theory -- A decade after the revolution
hep-th 2004-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

The paper reviews Liouville field theory and its matrix-model dual through early 2004, adding limited original derivations for N=2 dual actions and unoriented crosscap comparisons.

How the literature uses it

37 arXiv papers cite this in 57 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 33 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper

Contrary to the case of a two-term shift equation such as for $C_0$, showing uniqueness is actually rather difficult in this case and the arguments for this that have been given in the literature are incomplete, e.g. [ref] .[Let us note that the previous proofs contain at least two gaps.

Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks · Uniqueness of the solution · contest 0.90

Uses its data or values 1 paper

* the boundary three-point function [ref] [equation] We here give the boundary structure constant explicitly because we use it in the following sections: [equation] The coefficients $U_i$ and $V_i$, $i=1,…,4$ are [equation]

Higher Equations of Motion in Boundary Liouville Field Theory · Boundary Liouville field theory · 0.81

Cites it as background 16 papers

The full conformal bootstrap of Liouville theory on the disc was performed in [ref] [ref] , resulting in the identification of a consistent boundary condition for the Liouville theory; the FZZT brane.

The Spectrum of FZZT Branes Beyond the Planar Limit · $(p,q)$ Minimal Strings and FZZT branes · 0.89
In the continuum formulation of Liouville theory coupled to a CFT, two forms of boundary states for the gravitational degrees of freedom have been identified; Fateev-Zamolodchikov-Zamolodchikov-Teschner (FZZT) [ref] and Zamolodchikov-Zamolodchikov (ZZ) [ref] which depend on a real parameter $σ$ and integer valued parameters $n$ and $m$ respectively.

FZZT Brane Relations in the Presence of Boundary Magnetic Fields · Introduction · 0.98
Let us review some facts on the boundary Liouville field theory [ref] .

On mini-superspace limit of boundary three-point function in Liouville field theory · Boundary Liouville field theory · 1.00

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [10]

K.Hosomichi. “ Bulk-Boundary Propagator in Liouville Theory on a Disc ” hep-th/0108093 Al.B.Zamolodchikov, conference on Liouville ﬁeld theory, Montpellier, january 1998, unpublished

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[2] [12]

B.Ponsot and J.Teschner. “ Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefﬁcients for a contin- uous series of representations of Uq(sl(2, R))”, math-qa/0007097, to appear in CMP

View on Pith

[3] [14]

J.Teschner “ Liouville theory revisited”, hep-th/0104158

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[4] [7]

G.Felder, J.Fr¨ ohlich, J.Fuchs and C.Schweigert. “ Conformal boundary conditions and three dimensional topological ﬁeld theory”, Phys. Rev. Lett 84(2000) 1659-1662; preprint hep-th/9912239

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[5] [1]

E.W.Barnes. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 196 (1901) 265-388

View on Pith 1901

[6] [2]

R. Behrend, P. Pearce, V . Petkova, J.-B. Zuber:Nucl. Phys. B570 (2000) 525-589

View on Pith 2000

[7] [3]

J. Cardy, Nucl. Phys. B324 (1989) 581; J. Cardy, D. Lewellen, Phys. Lett. B259 (1991) 274; D. Lewellen, Nucl. Phys. B372 (1992) 654-682

View on Pith 1989

[8] [4]

T.Curtright, C.Thorn. “ Conformally invariant quantization of Liouville theory” Phys.Rev.Lett.48 (1982) 1309

View on Pith 1982

[9] [5]

H.Dorn and H.-J.Otto.” Two and three point functions in Liouville theory ” Nucl.Phys. B429 (1994), 375

View on Pith 1994

[10] [6]

Vl.Dotsenko, V .Fateev. Nucl. Phys. B241 (1984) 333

View on Pith 1984

[11] [8]

G.Moore, N.Seiberg. “ Classical and quantum conformal ﬁeld theory” Comm. Math. Phys 123 (1989) 177-254 [FF] B.L. Feigin, D.B. Fuchs: Representations of the Viraso ro algebra, in: Representations of Lie groups and related topics, eds. A.M. Vershik, D.P. Zhelobenko (Gordon and Breach, London 1990)

View on Pith 1989

[12] [9]

V .Fateev, A.Zamolodchikov and Al.Zamolodchikov. “Boundary Liouville Field Theory. I. Boundary state and Boundary two-point function”, hep-th/0001012. 20

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [11]

B.Ponsot and J.Teschner. “ Louville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group.” hep-th/9911110

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[14] [13]

I.Runkel.” Boundary structure constants for the A series Virasoro minimal models” Nucl. Phys. B549 (1999) 563-578 J.Teschner, unpublished

View on Pith 1999

[15] [15]

J.Teschner. “Remarks on Liouville theory with boundary”, hep-th/0009138

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[16] [16]

A.B.Zamolodchikov and Al.B.Zamolodchikov. “Structure constants and conformal boot- strap in Liouville ﬁeld theory” Nucl.Phys. B477 (1996), 577

View on Pith 1996

[17] [17]

E.W. Barnes: Theory of the double gamma function, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A196 (1901) 265–388

View on Pith 1901

[18] [18]

T. Shintani: On a Kronecker limit formula for real quadratic ﬁelds , J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 1A Math. 24 (1977) 167–199

View on Pith 1977