An algebraic approach to logarithmic conformal field theory

Matthias R Gaberdiel

REVIEW

An algebraic approach to logarithmic conformal field theory

Matthias R Gaberdiel

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 28 Nov 2001 · 80 references

Pith's verdict: A genuinely useful set of lecture notes on logarithmic CFT; the c = −2 material is solid and checkable, and the only real soft spot is the openly flagged twist-symmetry assumption in the §5 preview.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on November 11, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 1 major objection · 12 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0111260 (version 1)

Pith IDGMMIPO26, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationMatthias R Gaberdiel. "An algebraic approach to logarithmic conformal field theory." arXiv:hep-th/0111260 (2001). https://pith.science/paper/GMMIPO26

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is Gaberdiel's Tehran school lectures on logarithmic CFT, and it does what it says on the tin: a coherent algebraic introduction built around the c = −2 triplet theory. If you want the representation-theoretic picture of why logarithms appear — indecomposable modules rather than branch cuts as the primitive notion — this is the cleanest place to get it. The Zhu's algebra interlude is a real service; the Yang-Lee worked example (3.5) takes a construction that is usually quoted and actually grinds through it, and the appendix on why the Zhu product is associative is the kind of thing that never makes it into papers. Sections 2 and 3 are checkable line by line: the null vector (2.5), the indicial double root (2.14), the comultiplication computation giving the L0 matrix (2.33). I did spot-check these and they hold up. The local theory in §4 and the symplectic-fermion identification are a good compressed account of [18] and [59]. Nothing here is new except the k = −4/3 preview, and the paper is honest about that in the abstract [abstract:s0]. Treat it as a review and it is a good one. The soft spot is §5.2, where the author assumes fusion equivariance under the twist automorphism π_s, (5.14), and then uses it to fix every product involving H0 and D^±_{∓2/3}, including the unbounded-below π_{−2}(H0) in (5.18). The stress-test note is right that this is not automatic: for odd s the automorphism is outer, and the comultiplication (2.21)–(2.23) is built from modes of definite index, so equivariance under an index-shifting map is a real statement, not a formality. Two mitigations. The text says the §5.3 rules were also obtained 'using the analogue of the fusion algorithm described in section 2.2', so (5.14) is doing consistency duty, not carrying the whole load. And the full computation lives in [27], which is a public preprint, though listed as 'to appear' — worth knowing that §5 rests on a paper not yet in print. The undetermined γ in (5.36) is disclosed in the text and is a minor gap. None of this touches the c = −2 core. For a graduate student starting in this area, or anyone who needs the triplet fusion rules and characters in one place, this is the reference. Worth a serious referee's time, though as a review the referee's job is mostly to check the worked examples and the citation trail rather than to look for new claims.

Referee report

Significance

The notes are a genuinely useful pedagogical document. The c = -2 triplet theory is the canonical rational logarithmic theory, and §§2-4 give the clearest short account of why it is rational (finitely many indecomposables closing under fusion) yet violates Verlinde's formula and the Moore-Seiberg polynomial relations. The locality analysis of §4 is instructive precisely because it shows the non-chiral theory is not a sum of tensor products of chiral representations, and the symplectic-fermion identification in §4.2 supplies a free-field handle on an otherwise abstract construction. The Zhu algebra appendix, and the explicit Yang-Lee computation of §3.5, are a service to students. The derivations I checked in §§2-4 are correct: the null vector (2.5), the L0 matrix (2.33) (trace and determinant both vanish, as claimed), the Yang-Lee product (3.38)-(3.39), the identity θ_{1,2} = θ_{3,2}, and the modular invariance of the partition function in §4.1 all check out. The paper is honest about what it does not settle, flagging the Verlinde failure and the τ-dependent S-matrix entries rather than hiding them.

Major objections (1)

[§5.2, Eq. (5.14)] The text states 'we shall therefore assume in the following that the fusion rules also satisfy this property in the fractional case', where the property is (π_s H1 ⊗ π_t H2)_f = π_{s+t}((H1 ⊗ H2)_f). This assumption is then used to fix every product involving H0 and D^±_{∓2/3} ('already determined by virtue of the symmetry (5.14)'), and hence the headline conclusion of §5: that (D^+_{-2/3} ⊗ D^+_{-2/3})_f = π_{-2}(H0) has L0 spectrum unbounded below (5.18), so that fractional-level fusion leaves the highest-weight category. Two reasons this needs more support than it receives. First, π_s is index-shifting: (5.11) sends J^±_m → J^±_{m∓s} and (5.12) sends L0 → L0 - sJ^3_0 + ks²/4. For odd s the automorphism is outer, as the text itself notes, and fusion equivariance under an outer automorphism is not a formal consequence of the comultiplication (2.21)-(2.23), which is built from modes of definite index. Second, the independent verification the text points to ('this is consistent with what was found in [27]') lives in a preprint listed as 'to appear', so a reader of these notes cannot check it. Concrete request: add one worked computation of a product not fixed by (5.23), for example (D^+_{-2/3} ⊗ D^+_{-2/3})_f or (D^+_{-1/3} ⊗ D^-_{1/3})_f, using the §2.2 algorithm, so that (5.18) does not rest on the assumption alone. This is a correctness risk for §5 only; the c = -2 material of §§2-4 is self-contained and unaffected.

Minor objections (12)

[§3.7, Eq. (3.47) and §4.1] As typeset, χ_{R0} = χ_{R1} = 2η^{-1}θ_{1,2}. With that normalization the S-matrix display in §3.7 predicts χ_{R0}(-1/τ) = (1/4)η^{-1}(θ_{0,2} - θ_{2,2}), whereas direct transformation of (3.47) gives η^{-1}(θ_{0,2} - θ_{2,2}), a factor of four; and the chain in §4.1, '2|χ_{R0} + χ_{R1}|² = 2|η^{-1}θ_{1,2}|²', is off by sixteen. The internally consistent value is χ_{R0} = χ_{R1} = (1/2)η^{-1}θ_{1,2}, which reproduces the S matrix, the T-matrix entries diag(e^{2πi/12}, e^{2πi/12}, e^{-πi/12}, e^{11πi/12}), and Z = |η|^{-2} Σ_{k=0}^{3} |θ_{k,2}|². Please correct.
[§5.3, Eq. (5.35)] The displayed relation 'J^-_0 J^+_0 ω = γΩ = J^-_0 J^+_0 ω' equates a quantity with itself; the second expression should presumably be J^+_0 J^-_0 ω.
[§5.3, Eq. (5.24)] The symbol H_E appearing in (D^-_{1/3} ⊗ H_E)_f = R_{1/3} is not defined anywhere in the text; presumably it denotes E_0 or its highest-weight space. Please define it at first use.
[§5.3 and Figure 1] The representation produced in (5.24) is called R_{1/3} in the equation and in (5.37)-(5.43), but R_{-1/3} in the paragraph describing Figure 1 and in the caption. Please make the labelling consistent throughout.
[§5.3, Eq. (5.36)] The relation L_0 ω = (3 + (3/2)γ)Ω, with γ ≠ 0, -2, has a nonzero prefactor that can be absorbed into the normalization of ω. As written it obscures the fact that ω and Ω form the standard h = 0 Jordan block. A sentence saying so, and stating which OPE coefficient γ actually parametrizes, would help the reader.
[§3.6] The sentence introducing the diagram describes R_0 and R_1 as 'generalised highest weight representations', but the paragraph following the diagram states explicitly that R_1 'is not a highest weight representation'. Please reconcile the two descriptions.
[§4.2 versus §4] Section 4 says R 'does not have one cyclic state, but instead is generated from a state ω of weight (0,0) and the four states φ^{αᾱ} of weight (1,1)', while §4.2 says 'as the bosonic sector of the symplectic fermion representation, the representation R is generated from a single cyclic state ω'. Both are presumably true with respect to different algebras; please say so explicitly, since the apparent contradiction is exactly the kind of point a student will stumble on.
[§3.3] The passage from (3.14) to (3.15) is compressed into 'the constraint from W^a_1 N^{bc}_{-1}, together with (3.14) implies that W^a_0(8L_0-3)(L_0-1)ψ = 0'. A line showing the relevant commutator would make the classification of highest-weight representations checkable rather than asserted.
[§3.6] The rule (V_1 ⊗ V_1)_f = V_0 contains no j = 1 channel, even though V_1 is a doublet under the zero-mode su(2) and 1/2 ⊗ 1/2 = 0 ⊕ 1. A sentence explaining why the j = 1 combination is absent, or where it goes, would help; this is exactly the sort of point the notes are otherwise good at spelling out.
[§3.1] The sentence 'The triplet algebra (at c = -2) is only associative, because certain states in the vacuum representation ... are null' reads as 'only associative'; presumably the intended meaning is 'is associative only because'.
[§3.4, Eq. (3.21)] The notation 'φ(-1)ψ' in (3.21) is not defined; presumably it means V_{-1}(φ)ψ or the contour action of φ on ψ. Please define it.
[References] References [3], [27], [34], [39], [40] and [56] are preprints or unpublished lecture notes. Reference [27] in particular carries the §5.3 fusion rules, and [3] is cited for the characters in §3.7 (though [2] is given as a published alternative there). A note on the status of [27] would help the reader judge what is checkable from these notes alone.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

The paper argues that logarithmic branch cuts in conformal correlators are the analytic shadow of indecomposable representations of the chiral algebra, and it works the claim through the $c=-2$ triplet model and $widehat{su}(2)$ at $k=-4/3$

The reading

This set of lecture notes argues that the logarithmic branch cuts seen in some conformal field theories are not an analytic accident but the visible trace of a representation-theoretic fact: the chiral algebra acts on a space that cannot be split into irreducible pieces. The author develops the dictionary in the simplest case, the Virasoro theory at $c=-2$, where a four-point function forces a $log z$ term and the same structure appears as a two-dimensional Jordan cell for $L_0$. The notes then treat the $c=-2$ triplet algebra as the worked example of a 'rational logarithmic' theory: finitely many indecomposable representations close under fusion, a local theory can be built from them, and its partition function is modular invariant. A final section argues that the affine $widehat{su}(2)$ model at level $k=-4/3$ is also logarithmic, with fusion products that leave the class of highest-weight representations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the fusion product defined by the comultiplication of the Virasoro or affine modes. Contour integrals of the stress tensor around two insertions give two expansions of the same meromorphic function; identifying them defines the product representation, and the highest-weight quotient of that product is what the author computes. Zhu's algebra is the second device: it is the quotient of the vacuum module by states whose zero modes vanish on highest-weight states, and its irreducible representations match the allowed highest-weight representations. In the triplet model its constraints reduce the allowed highest weights to $h=0,-1/8,3/8,1$, with the $h=0$ case admitting the two-dimensional Jordan cell $L_0omega=Omega$, $L_0Omega=0$. For the local theory, locality requires the nilpotent part $S=L_0-bar L_0$ to annihilate every field, which forces quotients of $R_0otimesbar R_0$ and $R_1otimesbar R_1$ and produces a local representation $R$ that is not a simple tensor product.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that logarithmic conformal field theory is best organised by the representation theory of the chiral algebra, and that logarithmic correlators arise when the relevant representations are indecomposable—reducible but not completely reducible, so that $L_0$ has Jordan cells rather than a diagonal action. In the $c=-2$ triplet model the author exhibits a finite set of such representations, including the vacuum extension $R_0$ and the doublet extension $R_1$, computes their fusion products, and shows that the set closes. Zhu's algebra supplies the classification of allowed highest-weight representations and explains why a non-semisimple Zhu algebra is the algebraic signal of logarithmic behaviour. The same logic is then applied to $widehat{su}(2)$ at $k=-4/3$: fusion of admissible highest-weight representations produces representations whose $L_0$ spectrum is unbounded below and, in at least one case, a genuine logarithmic representation $R_{1/3}$.

Load-bearing premise

The fractional-level fusion rules in Section 5 rest on the assumption, stated just above Eq. (5.14), that fusion commutes with the twist automorphism $pi_s$; that assumption is not proved in these notes, and if it fails the $k=-4/3$ products and the logarithmic representation $R_{1/3}$ do not follow as written.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Rationality in the sense of finitely many indecomposable representations closing under fusion does not imply complete reducibility: the $c=-2$ triplet theory is the counterexample.
Verlinde's formula and the Moore-Seiberg polynomial relations cannot be expected to hold for such theories; the modular $S$ matrix of the triplet characters has $tau$-dependent entries and the fusion matrices need not be diagonalisable.
The local $c=-2$ triplet theory has a modular-invariant partition function equal to that of a free boson at radius $sqrt{2}$, and it coincides with the bosonic sector of a symplectic fermion model.
At fractional level, WZW fusion need not close on highest-weight representations: products can contain representations with $L_0$ unbounded below and logarithmic representations such as $R_{1/3}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If non-semisimple Zhu algebra is a reliable diagnostic, one could screen other non-rational WZW models or $W$-algebras for logarithmic behaviour by computing Zhu's algebra before attempting fusion.
The triplet example suggests that modular data are not a complete invariant of a logarithmic theory: the same partition function as a free boson at radius $sqrt{2}$ hides a different local field content and different fusion rules.
The locality quotient by $S$ is likely a general construction: any non-chiral theory built from tensor products of indecomposables must remove the nilpotent part of $L_0-bar L_0$, which would explain why naive tensor-product spectra overcount local states.
An independent check of one $k=-4/3$ fusion product not fixed by the twist symmetry would test whether the unbounded-below representations are genuine or an artifact of assuming $pi_s$ covariance.

Original abstract

A comprehensive introduction to logarithmic conformal field theory, using an algebraic point of view, is given. A number of examples are explained in detail, including the c=-2 triplet theory and the k=-4/3 affine su(2) theory. We also give some brief introduction to the work of Zhu.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,865 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.12 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

A comprehensive introduction to logarithmic conformal field theory, using an algebraic point of view, is given. A number of examples are explained in detail, including the c=-2 triplet theory and the k=-4/3 affine su(2) theory. We also give some brief introduction to the work of Zhu.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	A comprehensive introduction to logarithmic conformal field theory, using an algebraic point of view, is given.	contribution 0.99	0.82	0.19	asserted 0.99
s1	A number of examples are explained in detail, including the c=-2 triplet theory and the k=-4/3 affine su(2) theory.	contribution 0.93	0.75	0.05	asserted 1.00
s2	We also give some brief introduction to the work of Zhu.	background 0.52	0.40	0.04	asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.61.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** The representation R1 3 . Here we have arranged the circles representing the states according to their charges, with the horizontal axis corresponding to J 3 0 , and the vertical axis to L0. The horizontal array of circles represent the states of the form (m − 1 3 , − 1 3 ) with m ∈ ZZ, where the quantum numbers of a state (m, h) are given as J 3 0 (m, h) = m(m, h) (5.25) L0(m, h) = h(m, h). (5.26) 42

**Figure 2.** The representation R0. J − 0 J + 0 ω = γΩ = J − 0 J + 0 ω , (5.35) and L0ω = 3 + 3 2 γ Ω , (5.36) where γ 6= 0, −2 is a constant (that was not determined in [27]). Thus the two states ω and Ω form again the familiar Jordan block! One can actually determine at least some of the remaining fusion rules explicitly; under some natural assumption (that is described in [27]) one then finds that the fusion rules close among the representations H0, D ± j , E0, R0 and R1 3 , together with their images under πs. More specifically, one finds D − 1 3 ⊗ R0 f =

Figures reproduced from arXiv:hep-th/0111260 by the authors.

References

Works cited (80)

[18]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, A local logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B 538 , 631 (1999); hep-th/9807091

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[59]

H.G. Kausch, Symplectic fermions, Nucl. Phys. B583, 513 (2000); hep-th/0003029

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[27]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion rules and logarithmic representations of a WZW model at fractional level , hep-th/0105046, to appear in Nucl. Phys. B. 51

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[1]

H. Saleur, Polymers and percolation in two dimensions and twisted N = 2 super- symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B382, 486 (1992); hep-th/9111007

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992
[2]

M.A. Flohr, On modular invariant partition functions of conformal ﬁeld theories with logarithmic operators , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11, 4147 (1996); hep-th/9509166

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[3]

H.G. Kausch, Curiosities at c = −2, preprint DAMTP 95-52, hep-th/9510149

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[4]

G.M.T. Watts, A crossing probability for critical percolation in two dime nsions, J. Phys. A29, L363 (1996); cond-mat/9603167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[5]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, S. Rouhani, The Alf ’ven eﬀect and conformal ﬁeld theory , Nuovo Cimento 112B, 1079 (1997); hep-th/9507166

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[6]

M. Flohr, Two-dimensional turbulence: yet another conformal ﬁeld th eory solution, Nucl. Phys. B482, 567 (1996); hep-th/9606130

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[7]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, S. Rouhani, A logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory solution for two dimensional magnetohydrodynamics in presence of the Al f ’ven eﬀect, Europhys. Lett. 37, 447 (1997); hep-th/9606143

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[8]

V. Gurarie, M. Flohr, C. Nayak, The Haldane-Rezayi quantum hall state and con- formal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B498, 513 (1997); cond-math/9701212

View on Pith 1997
[9]

K. Ino, Modular invariants in the fractional quantum hall eﬀect , Nucl. Phys. B532, 783 (1998); cond-mat/9804198

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[10]

S. Mathieu, P. Ruelle, Scaling ﬁelds in the two-dimensional abelian sandpile mode l, hep-th/0107150

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[11]

J.-S. Caux, I.I. Kogan, A.M. Tsvelik, Logarithmic operators and hidden continu- ous symmetry in critical disordered models , Nucl. Phys. B466, 444 (1996); hep- th/9511134

View on Pith 1996
[12]

J.-S. Caux, I.I. Kogan, A. Lewis and A.M. Tsvelik, Logarithmic operators and dy- namical extension of the symmetry group in the bosonic SU (2)0 and SUSY SU (2)2 WZNW models , Nucl. Phys. B489, 469 (1997); hep-th/9606138

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[13]

Z. Maassarani, D. Serban, Non-unitary conformal ﬁeld theory and logarithmic op- erators for disordered systems , Nucl. Phys. B489, 603 (1997); hep-th/9605062. 50

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[14]

J.-S. Caux, N. Taniguchi, A.M. Tsvelik, Disordered Dirac fermions: multifractality termination and logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B525, 671 (1998); cond-mat/9801055

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[15]

S. Guruswamy, A. LeClair, A.W.W. Ludwig, gl(N|N) super-current algebras for disordered Dirac fermions in two dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B583, 475 (2000); cond- mat/9909143

View on Pith 2000
[16]

A.W.W. Ludwig, A free ﬁeld representation of the Osp(2|2) current algebra at level k = −2, and Dirac fermions in a random SU (2) gauge potential, cond-mat/0012189

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[17]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, A rational logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B386, 131 (1996); hep-th/9606050

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[19]

E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal ﬁe ld theory, Nucl. Phys. B300 [FS22] , 360 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[20]

G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Polynomial equations for rational conformal ﬁeld theories , Phys. Lett. B212, 451 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[21]

L. Rozansky, H. Saleur, Quantum ﬁeld theory for the multi-variable Alexander- Conway polynomial , Nucl. Phys. B376, 461 (1992); hep-th/9203069

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992
[22]

V. Gurarie, Logarithmic operators in conformal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B410, 535 (1993); hep-th/9303160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993
[23]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, Indecomposable fusion products, Nucl. Phys. B477, 293 (1996); hep-th/9604026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[24]

A. Bilal, I.I. Kogan, On gravitational dressing of 2D ﬁeld theories in chiral gaug e, Nucl. Phys. B449, 569 (1995); hep-th/9503209

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[25]

A. Nichols, Logarithmic currents in the SU (2)0 WZNW model , Phys. Lett. B516, 439 (2001); hep-th/0102156

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[26]

I.I. Kogan, A. Nichols, SU (2)0 and OSp(2|2)−2 WZNW models : two current alge- bras, one logarithmic CFT , hep-th/0107160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[28]

M. Flohr, Singular vectors in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B514, 523 (1998); hep-th/9707090

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[29]

M.A. Flohr, Bits and pieces in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , hep-th/0111228

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[30]

A. Shaﬁekhani, M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Logarithmic operators in conformal ﬁeld theory and the W∞-algebra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12, 3723 (1997); hep-th/9604007

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[31]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, A. Aghamohammadi, M. Khorrami, The logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B497, 555 (1997); hep-th/9610168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[32]

M. Khorrami, A. Aghamohammadi, M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Logarithmic confor- mal ﬁeld theories with continuous weights , Phys. Lett. B419, 179 (1998); hep- th/9711155

View on Pith 1998
[33]

M.A. Flohr, Operator product expansion in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld t heory, hep- th/0107242

View on Pith
[34]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith
[35]

F. Rohsiepe, On reducible but indecomposable representations of the Vir asoro alge- bra, hep-th/9611160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[36]

I.I. Kogan, J.F. Wheater, Boundary logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B486, 353 (2000); hep-th/0003184

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[37]

Y. Ishimoto, Boundary states in boundary logarithmic CFT , hep-th/0103064

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[38]

S. Kawai, J.F. Wheater, Modular transformation and boundary states in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B508, 203 (2001); hep-th/0103197

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[39]

Y. Ishimoto, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith
[40]

S. Kawai, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith
[41]

P. Ginsparg, Applied conformal ﬁeld theory , in: Fields, strings and critical phenom- ena, eds. E. Brezin, J. Zinn-Justin, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1 990)

View on Pith
[42]

Ph. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal ﬁeld theory , Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[43]

M.R. Gaberdiel, An introduction to conformal ﬁeld theory , Rept. Prog. Phys. 63, 607 (2000); hep-th/9910156. 52

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[44]

Y. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras, elliptic functions and modular f orms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9, 237 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[45]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion in conformal ﬁeld theory as the tensor product of the s ym- metry algebra , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 4619 (1994); hep-th/9307183

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[46]

W. Nahm, Quasi-rational fusion products , Int. J. Mod. Phys. B8, 3693 (1994); hep-th/9402039

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[47]

C. Dong, G. Mason, Vertex operator algebras and moonshine: A survey , Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 24, 101 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[48]

H.G. Kausch, Extended conformal algebras generated by a multiplet of pri mary ﬁelds, Phys. Lett. B259, 448 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[49]

E. Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 455 (1984)

View on Pith 1984
[50]

M.R. Gaberdiel, P. Goddard, Axiomatic Conformal Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 549 (2000); hep-th/9810019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[51]

I.B. Frenkel, Y. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of aﬃne and Virasoro algebras , Duke. Math. Journ. 66, 123 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[52]

B.L. Feigin, T. Nakanishi, H. Ooguri, The annihilating ideals of minimal models , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 217 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[53]

W. Eholzer, A. Honecker, R. H¨ ubel, How complete is the classiﬁcation of W- symmetries?, Phys. Lett. B308, 42 (1993)

View on Pith 1993
[54]

W. Eholzer, M. Flohr, A. Honecker, R. H¨ ubel, W. Nahm, R. Varn hagen, Repre- sentations of W -algebras with two generators and new rational models , Nucl. Phys. B383, 249 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[55]

P. Goddard, Meromorphic conformal ﬁeld theory , in: Inﬁnite dimensional Lie Al- gebras and Lie Groups, ed. V.G. Kac, page 556, World Scientiﬁc, Sing apore, New Jersey, Hong Kong, (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[56]

M.R. Gaberdiel, A. Neitzke, Rationality, quasirationality and ﬁnite W-algebras , DAMTP-2000-111, hep-th/0009235

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[57]

W. Wang, Rationality of Virasoro vertex operator algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. 7, 197 (1993). 53

View on Pith 1993
[58]

V.G. Kac, Inﬁnite-dimensional Lie algebras , Cambridge (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[60]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion of twisted representations , Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A 12 , 5183 (1997); hep-th/9607036

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[61]

P. Ginsparg, Curiositites at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B295, 153 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[62]

D. Gepner, E. Witten, String theory on group manifolds , Nucl. Phys. B278, 493 (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[63]

M.A. Walton, Fusion rules in Wess-Zumino-Witten models , Nucl. Phys. B340, 777 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[64]

P. Furlan, A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, Quantum groups and fusion rules multi- plicities, Nucl. Phys. B343, 205 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[65]

V.G. Kac, M. Wakimoto, Modular invariant representations of inﬁnite dimensional Lie algebras and superalgebras , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4956 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[66]

I.G. Koh, P. Sorba, Fusion rules and (sub)-modular invariant partition functi ons in non-unitary theories , Phys. Lett. B215, 723 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[67]

P. Mathieu, M.A. Walton, Fractional level Kac-Moody algebras and nonunitary coset conformal ﬁeld theories , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 102, 229 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[68]

D. Bernard, G. Felder, Fock representations and BRST cohomology in sl(2) current algebra, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 145 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[69]

S. Panda, Fractional level current algebras and spectrum of C <1 minimal models coupled to gravity , Phys. Lett. B251, 61 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[70]

H. Awata, Y. Yamada, Fusion rules for the fractional level ˆsl(2) algebra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 1185 (1992)

View on Pith 1992
[71]

V.S. Dotsenko, Solving the su(2) conformal ﬁeld theory with the Wakimoto free ﬁeld representation, Nucl. Phys. B358, 547 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[72]

B. Feigin, F. Malikov, Fusion algebra at a rational level and cohomology of nilpo- tent subalgebras of supersymmetric sl(2), Lett. Math. Phys. 31, 315 (1994); hep- th/9310004. 54

View on Pith 1994
[73]

O. Andreev, Operator algebra of the SL(2) conformal ﬁeld theories , Phys. Lett. B363, 166 (1995); hep-th/9504082

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995
[74]

C. Dong, H. Li, G. Mason, Vertex operator algebras associated to admissible repre- sentations of ˆsl2, Commun. Math. Phys. 184, 65 (1997); q-alg/9509026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[75]

J.L. Petersen, J. Rasmussen, M. Yu, Fusion, crossing and monodromy in conformal ﬁeld theory based on sl(2) current algebra with fractional level , Nucl. Phys. B481, 577 (1996); hep-th/9607129

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[76]

P. Furlan, A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, A(1)1 admissible representations – fu- sion transformations and local correlators , Nucl. Phys. B491, 635 (1997); hep- th/9608018

View on Pith 1997
[77]

A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, G.M.T. Watts, A note on decoupling conditions for generic level ˆsl(3)k and fusion rules , hep-th/9906139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[78]

B. Feigin, F. Malikov, Modular functor and representation theory of ˆsl2 at a rational level, Contemp. Math. 202, 357 (1997); q-alg/9511011

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[79]

A. Pressley, G.B. Segal, Loop groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)

View on Pith 1986
[80]

M.R. Gaberdiel, WZW models of general simple groups , Nucl. Phys. B460, 181 (1996); hep-th/9508105. 55

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

Forward citations

Cited by 16 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Higgsless Lagrangian SCFTs and Strongly Finite VOAs
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Higgsless Lagrangian N=2 SCFTs are sparse (free vectors, one SO/USp quiver family, three sporadics); the VOAs of two sporadics are strongly finite and logarithmic.
A BMS-invariant free scalar model
hep-th 2021-11 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A free scalar field theory in two dimensions realizes BMS symmetry with central charges c_L=2 and c_M=0, and its states form novel staggered modules.
On the Superconformal Index of Argyres-Douglas Theories
hep-th 2015-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

The paper conjectures closed-form expressions for the Schur index of the (A1,A2n-3) and (A1,D2n) Argyres-Douglas theories by assigning a wavefunction to an irregular puncture in q-deformed two-dimensional Yang-Mills theory.
Instability in cosmological topologically massive gravity at the chiral point
hep-th 2008-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Cosmological topologically massive gravity at the chiral point admits a physical bulk mode with finite negative energy that grows linearly in time, so the theory is unstable unless boundary conditions exclude the mode.
Reparametrization modes, shadow operators, and quantum chaos in higher-dimensional CFTs
hep-th 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The stress-tensor shadow, the reparametrization mode of Schwarzian and 2d CFT studies, and the kinematic-space OPE block are shown to be one object, giving a single closed-form stress-tensor conformal partial wave val...

Show 11 more citing papers

The ABC (in any D) of Logarithmic CFT
hep-th 2016-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper derives the general form of correlation functions and conformal block decompositions for logarithmic conformal field theories in any spacetime dimension, showing logarithmic blocks are derivatives of ordinar...
Graviton 1-loop partition function for 3-dimensional massive gravity
hep-th 2010-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

The one-loop graviton partition function of topologically massive gravity at the chiral point reproduces the single-particle spectrum of a logarithmic conformal field theory, supporting a logarithmic holographic dual.
Invertible defects and isomorphisms of rational CFTs
hep-th 2010-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Invertible topological defects between rational conformal field theories correspond one-to-one with conformal isomorphisms that preserve the rational symmetry, and the correspondence respects composition.
AdS_3/LCFT_2 - Correlators in New Massive Gravity
hep-th 2009-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

At its chiral point, New Massive Gravity has two-point correlators of a logarithmic CFT with vanishing central charges and new anomaly b_L = b_R = -12 sigma ell / G_N.
AdS_3/LCFT_2 - Correlators in Cosmological Topologically Massive Gravity
hep-th 2009-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Correlators computed from cosmological topologically massive gravity at the chiral point match the predictions of a logarithmic conformal field theory, supporting the proposed duality.
Closed strings from decaying D-branes
hep-th 2003-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A homogeneously rolling tachyon on a Dp-brane radiates closed strings with total energy that diverges for p of 2 or less and converges for p above 2, and the emitted state matches that of D-instantons at Euclidean dis...
Holographic reconstruction for defect CFTs from $\mathrm{AdS}_p \times S^q$ spacetimes
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Derives holographic one-point functions, stress tensor and Ward identities for defects in AdS5 and AdS6 from AdS2×S2, AdS2×S3 and AdS3×S2 backgrounds in Romans supergravity.
Constructing Carrollian Field Theories from Null Reduction
hep-th 2023-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Null reduction of Bargmann-invariant actions in d+1 dimensions produces off-shell Carrollian field theories in d dimensions, including both electric and magnetic sectors of scalars and electromagnetism.
Short-cut to new anomalies in gravity duals to logarithmic conformal field theories
hep-th 2010-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

The authors derive new anomaly values for generalised massive gravity and partially massless gravity by taking a limit of conformal weights, conditional on the LCFT conjecture holding for those models.
Logarithmic Conformal Field Theory: Beyond an Introduction
hep-th 2013-03 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

The review organizes logarithmic conformal field theory around a continuum Verlinde program, demonstrating it on three archetypal models and proposing it as a template for more general logarithmic theories.
Holographic applications of logarithmic conformal field theories
hep-th 2013-02 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Critically tuned anti-de Sitter gravity theories are conjectured to be dual to logarithmic conformal field theories, and this review assembles the correlator and partition-function evidence for that correspondence.

How the literature uses it

43 arXiv papers cite this in 56 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 20 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 2 papers

This structure is very similar to logarithmic CFTs with $c=0$ [ref] , where the Virasoro stress tensor is accompanied by a logarithmic partner and the Virasoro module is also enlarged to a staggered module.

A BMS-invariant free scalar model · The representation · 0.91
The similarity between this theory and the structures of the Logarithm CFTs (LogCFTs) [ref] has been pointed out in [ref] , but the relation between them is not straightforward, and as the results of this section show, the Jordan structure in the present case is associated to the seminull descendant fields.

Remarks on BMS${}_3$ invariant field theories: correlation functions and nonunitary CFTs · Nonunitary CFTs · 0.86

Cites it as background 26 papers

The latter being a defining property of logarithmic (L) CFTs [ref] , CCTMG was conjectured to be holographically dual to $c=0$ LCFTs, particularly effective in describing systems with (quenched) disorder [ref] , and was called log gravity [ref] .

Urn models, Markov chains and random walks in cosmological topologically massive gravity at the critical point · Introduction · 0.81
The staggered modules appear in the study of logarithmic CFTs with Virasoro conformal symmetry [ref] and Carrollian CFTs [ref] .

Split representation in celestial holography · Staggered modules of 2d global conformal algebra · 0.97
However, there are examples of CFTs that have vanishing left-moving central charge without being chiral, namely logarithmic CFTs (LCFTs), see [ref] and references therein.

AdS_3/LCFT_2 - Correlators in Cosmological Topologically Massive Gravity · Introduction · 0.80

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [18]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, A local logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B 538 , 631 (1999); hep-th/9807091

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[2] [59]

H.G. Kausch, Symplectic fermions, Nucl. Phys. B583, 513 (2000); hep-th/0003029

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[3] [27]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion rules and logarithmic representations of a WZW model at fractional level , hep-th/0105046, to appear in Nucl. Phys. B. 51

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[4] [1]

H. Saleur, Polymers and percolation in two dimensions and twisted N = 2 super- symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B382, 486 (1992); hep-th/9111007

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992

[5] [2]

M.A. Flohr, On modular invariant partition functions of conformal ﬁeld theories with logarithmic operators , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11, 4147 (1996); hep-th/9509166

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[6] [3]

H.G. Kausch, Curiosities at c = −2, preprint DAMTP 95-52, hep-th/9510149

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[7] [4]

G.M.T. Watts, A crossing probability for critical percolation in two dime nsions, J. Phys. A29, L363 (1996); cond-mat/9603167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[8] [5]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, S. Rouhani, The Alf ’ven eﬀect and conformal ﬁeld theory , Nuovo Cimento 112B, 1079 (1997); hep-th/9507166

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[9] [6]

M. Flohr, Two-dimensional turbulence: yet another conformal ﬁeld th eory solution, Nucl. Phys. B482, 567 (1996); hep-th/9606130

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[10] [7]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, S. Rouhani, A logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory solution for two dimensional magnetohydrodynamics in presence of the Al f ’ven eﬀect, Europhys. Lett. 37, 447 (1997); hep-th/9606143

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[11] [8]

V. Gurarie, M. Flohr, C. Nayak, The Haldane-Rezayi quantum hall state and con- formal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B498, 513 (1997); cond-math/9701212

View on Pith 1997

[12] [9]

K. Ino, Modular invariants in the fractional quantum hall eﬀect , Nucl. Phys. B532, 783 (1998); cond-mat/9804198

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[13] [10]

S. Mathieu, P. Ruelle, Scaling ﬁelds in the two-dimensional abelian sandpile mode l, hep-th/0107150

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[14] [11]

J.-S. Caux, I.I. Kogan, A.M. Tsvelik, Logarithmic operators and hidden continu- ous symmetry in critical disordered models , Nucl. Phys. B466, 444 (1996); hep- th/9511134

View on Pith 1996

[15] [12]

J.-S. Caux, I.I. Kogan, A. Lewis and A.M. Tsvelik, Logarithmic operators and dy- namical extension of the symmetry group in the bosonic SU (2)0 and SUSY SU (2)2 WZNW models , Nucl. Phys. B489, 469 (1997); hep-th/9606138

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[16] [13]

Z. Maassarani, D. Serban, Non-unitary conformal ﬁeld theory and logarithmic op- erators for disordered systems , Nucl. Phys. B489, 603 (1997); hep-th/9605062. 50

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[17] [14]

J.-S. Caux, N. Taniguchi, A.M. Tsvelik, Disordered Dirac fermions: multifractality termination and logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B525, 671 (1998); cond-mat/9801055

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[18] [15]

S. Guruswamy, A. LeClair, A.W.W. Ludwig, gl(N|N) super-current algebras for disordered Dirac fermions in two dimensions , Nucl. Phys. B583, 475 (2000); cond- mat/9909143

View on Pith 2000

[19] [16]

A.W.W. Ludwig, A free ﬁeld representation of the Osp(2|2) current algebra at level k = −2, and Dirac fermions in a random SU (2) gauge potential, cond-mat/0012189

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[20] [17]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, A rational logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B386, 131 (1996); hep-th/9606050

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[21] [19]

E. Verlinde, Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2D conformal ﬁe ld theory, Nucl. Phys. B300 [FS22] , 360 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[22] [20]

G. Moore, N. Seiberg, Polynomial equations for rational conformal ﬁeld theories , Phys. Lett. B212, 451 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[23] [21]

L. Rozansky, H. Saleur, Quantum ﬁeld theory for the multi-variable Alexander- Conway polynomial , Nucl. Phys. B376, 461 (1992); hep-th/9203069

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992

[24] [22]

V. Gurarie, Logarithmic operators in conformal ﬁeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B410, 535 (1993); hep-th/9303160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1993

[25] [23]

M.R. Gaberdiel, H.G. Kausch, Indecomposable fusion products, Nucl. Phys. B477, 293 (1996); hep-th/9604026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[26] [24]

A. Bilal, I.I. Kogan, On gravitational dressing of 2D ﬁeld theories in chiral gaug e, Nucl. Phys. B449, 569 (1995); hep-th/9503209

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[27] [25]

A. Nichols, Logarithmic currents in the SU (2)0 WZNW model , Phys. Lett. B516, 439 (2001); hep-th/0102156

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[28] [26]

I.I. Kogan, A. Nichols, SU (2)0 and OSp(2|2)−2 WZNW models : two current alge- bras, one logarithmic CFT , hep-th/0107160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[29] [28]

M. Flohr, Singular vectors in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B514, 523 (1998); hep-th/9707090

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[30] [29]

M.A. Flohr, Bits and pieces in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , hep-th/0111228

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[31] [30]

A. Shaﬁekhani, M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Logarithmic operators in conformal ﬁeld theory and the W∞-algebra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12, 3723 (1997); hep-th/9604007

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[32] [31]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, A. Aghamohammadi, M. Khorrami, The logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theories , Nucl. Phys. B497, 555 (1997); hep-th/9610168

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[33] [32]

M. Khorrami, A. Aghamohammadi, M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Logarithmic confor- mal ﬁeld theories with continuous weights , Phys. Lett. B419, 179 (1998); hep- th/9711155

View on Pith 1998

[34] [33]

M.A. Flohr, Operator product expansion in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld t heory, hep- th/0107242

View on Pith

[35] [34]

M.R. Rahimi Tabar, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith

[36] [35]

F. Rohsiepe, On reducible but indecomposable representations of the Vir asoro alge- bra, hep-th/9611160

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[37] [36]

I.I. Kogan, J.F. Wheater, Boundary logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B486, 353 (2000); hep-th/0003184

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[38] [37]

Y. Ishimoto, Boundary states in boundary logarithmic CFT , hep-th/0103064

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[39] [38]

S. Kawai, J.F. Wheater, Modular transformation and boundary states in logarithmic conformal ﬁeld theory , Phys. Lett. B508, 203 (2001); hep-th/0103197

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[40] [39]

Y. Ishimoto, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith

[41] [40]

S. Kawai, Lectures given at the school

View on Pith

[42] [41]

P. Ginsparg, Applied conformal ﬁeld theory , in: Fields, strings and critical phenom- ena, eds. E. Brezin, J. Zinn-Justin, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1 990)

View on Pith

[43] [42]

Ph. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal ﬁeld theory , Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[44] [43]

M.R. Gaberdiel, An introduction to conformal ﬁeld theory , Rept. Prog. Phys. 63, 607 (2000); hep-th/9910156. 52

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[45] [44]

Y. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras, elliptic functions and modular f orms, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9, 237 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[46] [45]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion in conformal ﬁeld theory as the tensor product of the s ym- metry algebra , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 4619 (1994); hep-th/9307183

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[47] [46]

W. Nahm, Quasi-rational fusion products , Int. J. Mod. Phys. B8, 3693 (1994); hep-th/9402039

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[48] [47]

C. Dong, G. Mason, Vertex operator algebras and moonshine: A survey , Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 24, 101 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[49] [48]

H.G. Kausch, Extended conformal algebras generated by a multiplet of pri mary ﬁelds, Phys. Lett. B259, 448 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[50] [49]

E. Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 92, 455 (1984)

View on Pith 1984

[51] [50]

M.R. Gaberdiel, P. Goddard, Axiomatic Conformal Field Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 209, 549 (2000); hep-th/9810019

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[52] [51]

I.B. Frenkel, Y. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of aﬃne and Virasoro algebras , Duke. Math. Journ. 66, 123 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[53] [52]

B.L. Feigin, T. Nakanishi, H. Ooguri, The annihilating ideals of minimal models , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 217 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[54] [53]

W. Eholzer, A. Honecker, R. H¨ ubel, How complete is the classiﬁcation of W- symmetries?, Phys. Lett. B308, 42 (1993)

View on Pith 1993

[55] [54]

W. Eholzer, M. Flohr, A. Honecker, R. H¨ ubel, W. Nahm, R. Varn hagen, Repre- sentations of W -algebras with two generators and new rational models , Nucl. Phys. B383, 249 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[56] [55]

P. Goddard, Meromorphic conformal ﬁeld theory , in: Inﬁnite dimensional Lie Al- gebras and Lie Groups, ed. V.G. Kac, page 556, World Scientiﬁc, Sing apore, New Jersey, Hong Kong, (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[57] [56]

M.R. Gaberdiel, A. Neitzke, Rationality, quasirationality and ﬁnite W-algebras , DAMTP-2000-111, hep-th/0009235

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[58] [57]

W. Wang, Rationality of Virasoro vertex operator algebras , Int. Math. Res. Not. 7, 197 (1993). 53

View on Pith 1993

[59] [58]

V.G. Kac, Inﬁnite-dimensional Lie algebras , Cambridge (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[60] [60]

M.R. Gaberdiel, Fusion of twisted representations , Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A 12 , 5183 (1997); hep-th/9607036

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[61] [61]

P. Ginsparg, Curiositites at c = 1, Nucl. Phys. B295, 153 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[62] [62]

D. Gepner, E. Witten, String theory on group manifolds , Nucl. Phys. B278, 493 (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[63] [63]

M.A. Walton, Fusion rules in Wess-Zumino-Witten models , Nucl. Phys. B340, 777 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[64] [64]

P. Furlan, A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, Quantum groups and fusion rules multi- plicities, Nucl. Phys. B343, 205 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[65] [65]

V.G. Kac, M. Wakimoto, Modular invariant representations of inﬁnite dimensional Lie algebras and superalgebras , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4956 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[66] [66]

I.G. Koh, P. Sorba, Fusion rules and (sub)-modular invariant partition functi ons in non-unitary theories , Phys. Lett. B215, 723 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[67] [67]

P. Mathieu, M.A. Walton, Fractional level Kac-Moody algebras and nonunitary coset conformal ﬁeld theories , Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 102, 229 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[68] [68]

D. Bernard, G. Felder, Fock representations and BRST cohomology in sl(2) current algebra, Commun. Math. Phys. 127, 145 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[69] [69]

S. Panda, Fractional level current algebras and spectrum of C <1 minimal models coupled to gravity , Phys. Lett. B251, 61 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[70] [70]

H. Awata, Y. Yamada, Fusion rules for the fractional level ˆsl(2) algebra, Mod. Phys. Lett. A7, 1185 (1992)

View on Pith 1992

[71] [71]

V.S. Dotsenko, Solving the su(2) conformal ﬁeld theory with the Wakimoto free ﬁeld representation, Nucl. Phys. B358, 547 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[72] [72]

B. Feigin, F. Malikov, Fusion algebra at a rational level and cohomology of nilpo- tent subalgebras of supersymmetric sl(2), Lett. Math. Phys. 31, 315 (1994); hep- th/9310004. 54

View on Pith 1994

[73] [73]

O. Andreev, Operator algebra of the SL(2) conformal ﬁeld theories , Phys. Lett. B363, 166 (1995); hep-th/9504082

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1995

[74] [74]

C. Dong, H. Li, G. Mason, Vertex operator algebras associated to admissible repre- sentations of ˆsl2, Commun. Math. Phys. 184, 65 (1997); q-alg/9509026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[75] [75]

J.L. Petersen, J. Rasmussen, M. Yu, Fusion, crossing and monodromy in conformal ﬁeld theory based on sl(2) current algebra with fractional level , Nucl. Phys. B481, 577 (1996); hep-th/9607129

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[76] [76]

P. Furlan, A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, A(1)1 admissible representations – fu- sion transformations and local correlators , Nucl. Phys. B491, 635 (1997); hep- th/9608018

View on Pith 1997

[77] [77]

A.Ch. Ganchev, V.B. Petkova, G.M.T. Watts, A note on decoupling conditions for generic level ˆsl(3)k and fusion rules , hep-th/9906139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[78] [78]

B. Feigin, F. Malikov, Modular functor and representation theory of ˆsl2 at a rational level, Contemp. Math. 202, 357 (1997); q-alg/9511011

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[79] [79]

A. Pressley, G.B. Segal, Loop groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)

View on Pith 1986

[80] [80]

M.R. Gaberdiel, WZW models of general simple groups , Nucl. Phys. B460, 181 (1996); hep-th/9508105. 55

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996