Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Type IIB Seven-brane Solutions from Nine-dimensional Domain Walls

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 21 Mar 2002

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The uplifting of these domain wall solutions to ten dimensions leads to three classes of half-supersymmetric Type IIB 7-brane solutions.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDhep-th/0203202 (version 3)
Pith IDZISZE4UE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationD. Roest, E. Bergshoeff, U. Gran. "Type IIB Seven-brane Solutions from Nine-dimensional Domain Walls." arXiv:hep-th/0203202 (2002). https://pith.science/paper/ZISZE4UE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,225 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.34 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.70 · compares with prior results 0.44 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions of four maximally supersymmetric D=9 massive supergravity theories obtained by Scherk-Schwarz reduction of D=10 IIA and IIB supergravity. One of the theories does not have a superpotential and does not allow domain wall solutions preserving any supersymmetry. The other three theories have superpotentials leading to half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions, one of which has zero potential but non-zero superpotential. The uplifting of these domain wall solutions to ten dimensions leads to three classes of half-supersymmetric Type IIB 7-brane solutions. All solutions within each class are related by SL(2,R) transformations. The three classes together contain solutions carrying all possible (quantised) 7-brane charges. One class contains the well-known D7-brane solution and its dual partners and we provide the explicit solutions for the other two classes. The domain wall solution with zero potential lifts up to a half-supersymmetric conical space-time.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions of four maximally supersymmetric D=9 massive supergravity theories obtained by Scherk-Schwarz reduction of D=10 IIA and IIB supergravity. contribution 0.97 0.87 0.06 asserted 0.97
s1 One of the theories does not have a superpotential and does not allow domain wall solutions preserving any supersymmetry. result 1.00 0.77 0.04 asserted 1.00
s2 The other three theories have superpotentials leading to half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions, one of which has zero potential but non-zero superpotential. result 1.00 0.79 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 The uplifting of these domain wall solutions to ten dimensions leads to three classes of half-supersymmetric Type IIB 7-brane solutions. result 0.88 0.87 0.57 asserted 1.00
s4 All solutions within each class are related by SL(2,R) transformations. result 0.98 0.75 0.09 asserted 1.00
s5 The three classes together contain solutions carrying all possible (quantised) 7-brane charges. result 0.95 0.80 0.25 asserted 1.00
s6 One class contains the well-known D7-brane solution and its dual partners and we provide the explicit solutions for the other two classes. contribution 0.73 0.88 0.20 asserted 1.00
s7 The domain wall solution with zero potential lifts up to a half-supersymmetric conical space-time. result 0.99 0.85 0.11 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions of four maximally supersymmetric D=9 massive supergravity theories obtained by Scherk-Schwarz reduction of D=10 IIA and IIB supergravity. One of the theories does not have a superpotential and does not allow domain wall solutions preserving any supersymmetry. The other three theories have superpotentials leading to half-supersymmetric domain wall solutions, one of which has zero potential but non-zero superpotential. The uplifting of these domain wall solutions to ten dimensions leads to three classes of half-supersymmetric Type IIB 7-brane solutions. All solutions within each class are related by SL(2,R) transformations. The three classes together contain solutions carrying all possible (quantised) 7-brane charges. One class contains the well-known D7-brane solution and its dual partners and we provide the explicit solutions for the other two classes. The domain wall solution with zero potential lifts up to a half-supersymmetric conical space-time.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

14 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 12 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.