pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15276 · v1 · pith:JKKZ724Qnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ✦ hep-th

Bordisms between 9d type IIB supergravities and commutator widths of duality groups

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords bordismswampland cobordism conjectureduality groupscommutator widthtype IIB supergravity9d gauged supergravitiesmonodromiesgravitational solitons
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:JKKZ724Q Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{JKKZ724Q}

Prints a linked pith:JKKZ724Q badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

When the commutator width of a duality group diverges, infinitely many duality defects must be included.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines bordisms that interpolate between different 9d gauged supergravities obtained from type IIB string theory compactified on a circle with a nontrivial SL(2,Z) bundle. These bordisms realize the required monodromies either through stacks of [p,q] 7-branes or through gravitational solitons whose topology grows more complex as the monodromy becomes larger, resulting in arbitrary suppression of the bordism. This suppression conflicts with the quantum gravity expectation that global symmetries must be broken. The authors therefore propose a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for the first bordism group with a duality bundle G, arguing that an infinite number of duality defects is needed precisely when the commutator width of G diverges.

Core claim

We propose a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for the first bordism group Ω1(BG) with a G duality bundle. We argue that even if gravitational solitons can realize the monodromies associated with elements of the commutator subgroup of G, if the number of needed commutators is unbounded (in other words, the commutator width of G diverges) then an infinite number of duality defects realizing elements in G need to be included. We test this proposal for different duality groups G, and see that our expectations are realized, often in non-trivial ways.

What carries the argument

The refined Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for Ω1(BG) that uses the commutator width of the duality group G to decide whether a finite or infinite number of duality defects must be added to realize all monodromies.

If this is right

  • For duality groups whose commutator width remains finite, only a finite collection of duality defects is required to generate all monodromies.
  • Bordisms realized solely by gravitational solitons are suppressed when the required number of commutators grows without bound.
  • The refinement applies across the different duality groups that arise in 9d supergravities descending from type IIB.
  • Elements of the commutator subgroup can be realized by solitons, while elements outside this subgroup generally require explicit duality defects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same logic may extend to higher bordism groups or to other global symmetries in quantum gravity.
  • Consistent string compactifications could be restricted to those duality groups whose commutator width is finite unless supplemented by infinite defect towers.
  • Explicit model-building in lower-dimensional supergravities with known duality groups offers a route to further tests of the refinement.

Load-bearing premise

The topology of bordisms that realize large monodromies through gravitational solitons grows arbitrarily complicated and therefore suffers arbitrary suppression that must be offset by adding infinitely many duality defects exactly when the commutator width diverges.

What would settle it

An explicit construction of a gravitational-soliton bordism that realizes an element outside the commutator subgroup or requiring arbitrarily many commutators while keeping the suppression factor finite and without adding extra duality defects.

read the original abstract

We study the topological properties of bordisms interpolating between different 9d gauged supergravities obtained from compactification of type IIB string theory on $\mathbb{S}^1$ with a non-trivial $\mathsf{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$ bundle. We describe how such bordisms implement the needed monodromies through stacks of $[p,q]$ 7-branes or gravitational solitons of non-trivial topology. For the later mechanism, we see that the topology of the bordism becomes increasingly complicated for large monodromies, which results in the associated bordisms being arbitrarily suppressed, against expectations on the breaking of global symmetries in Quantum Gravity. Motivated by this, we propose a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for the first bordism group $\Omega_1({\rm B}G)$ with a $G$ duality bundle. We argue that even if gravitational solitons can realize the monodromies associated with elements of the commutator subgroup of $G$, if the number of needed commutators is unbounded (in other words, the commutator width of $G$ diverges) then an infinite number of duality defects realizing elements in $G$ need to be included. We test this proposal for different duality groups $G$, and see that our expectations are realized, often in non-trivial ways.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies bordisms interpolating between 9d gauged supergravities from type IIB on S¹ with non-trivial SL(2,ℤ) bundles. Monodromies are realized either by stacks of [p,q] 7-branes or by gravitational solitons whose bordism topology grows more complex (higher genus, additional handles) for large monodromies, leading to arbitrary suppression. This observation motivates a refinement of the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for Ω₁(BG) with a G-duality bundle: even if solitons realize commutator-subgroup elements, a diverging commutator width of G requires infinitely many duality defects realizing elements of G. The proposal is tested for several duality groups G, with expectations realized in non-trivial ways.

Significance. If the proposed refinement is substantiated, it would furnish a new algebraic-topological criterion for the inclusion of duality defects in quantum gravity, directly tying the commutator width of duality groups to the breaking of global symmetries. The explicit tests across multiple G provide concrete illustrations that could guide further swampland studies. The work usefully connects bordism theory with group-theoretic invariants, though its impact depends on making the suppression mechanism quantitative.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / proposal for Ω₁(BG)] Abstract and the paragraph introducing the refined conjecture for Ω₁(BG): the inference that a diverging commutator width necessitates infinitely many duality defects (rather than finitely many but arbitrarily heavy ones) rests on the assertion of 'arbitrary suppression' from increasing bordism complexity. No explicit formula, bound, or scaling relation is supplied that converts a topological invariant (genus, number of handles, or other bordism data) into a suppression factor such as an instanton action or exponential weight that demonstrably diverges with commutator number.
  2. [Gravitational solitons and bordism topology] Discussion of gravitational solitons realizing monodromies: the statement that 'the topology of the bordism becomes increasingly complicated for large monodromies' is presented qualitatively. A concrete example or estimate showing how the required number of commutators maps to a quantifiable suppression that becomes unbounded would be needed to secure the central claim that this forces inclusion of infinitely many defects precisely when the commutator width diverges.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction / notation] The definition and basic properties of commutator width for the relevant duality groups (e.g., SL(2,ℤ) and its extensions) should be recalled or referenced at the first appearance to aid readers unfamiliar with the group-theoretic notion.
  2. [Figures and bordism descriptions] Figure captions or the text describing the bordism constructions could explicitly label which features (handles, genus, etc.) correspond to additional commutators to make the complexity argument easier to follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below. Revisions have been made to clarify the qualitative nature of our arguments where feasible.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / proposal for Ω₁(BG)] Abstract and the paragraph introducing the refined conjecture for Ω₁(BG): the inference that a diverging commutator width necessitates infinitely many duality defects (rather than finitely many but arbitrarily heavy ones) rests on the assertion of 'arbitrary suppression' from increasing bordism complexity. No explicit formula, bound, or scaling relation is supplied that converts a topological invariant (genus, number of handles, or other bordism data) into a suppression factor such as an instanton action or exponential weight that demonstrably diverges with commutator number.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. The refined conjecture is motivated by the general expectation in quantum gravity that bordisms of increasing topological complexity (higher genus or additional handles) correspond to contributions that are arbitrarily suppressed in the path integral. We do not supply an explicit formula or scaling relation in this work, as a quantitative derivation of the instanton action or exponential weight from the bordism data would require a detailed effective-field-theory analysis of the 9d gravitational solitons that is beyond the present scope. The central claim remains that, for duality groups whose commutator width diverges, the suppression can be made arbitrarily strong, thereby necessitating infinitely many duality defects to realize all group elements without violating expectations on global symmetries. We have revised the abstract and the relevant introductory paragraph to state explicitly that the suppression argument is qualitative and to flag the need for future quantitative work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Gravitational solitons and bordism topology] Discussion of gravitational solitons realizing monodromies: the statement that 'the topology of the bordism becomes increasingly complicated for large monodromies' is presented qualitatively. A concrete example or estimate showing how the required number of commutators maps to a quantifiable suppression that becomes unbounded would be needed to secure the central claim that this forces inclusion of infinitely many defects precisely when the commutator width diverges.

    Authors: We agree that the discussion of gravitational solitons is presented qualitatively. The manuscript illustrates the trend for SL(2,ℤ) by noting that larger commutator widths require bordisms with higher genus or extra handles, which are expected to be more suppressed. No explicit numerical mapping or estimate is provided here, as constructing such a quantitative relation would demand concrete computations of soliton actions in the 9d theory. We have added a clarifying sentence and a reference to related literature on topological complexity and instanton suppression to make the qualitative reasoning more transparent, while acknowledging that a full quantitative treatment remains an open task. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal is a motivated refinement with independent content

full rationale

The paper's chain consists of an observational claim about bordism topology growing complicated for large monodromies (leading to asserted arbitrary suppression) followed by a proposal to refine the Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for Ω1(BG) when commutator width diverges. This is presented as motivation rather than a closed derivation or first-principles result that reduces to its inputs by construction. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central refinement has independent content as a suggested adjustment to account for global symmetry breaking expectations, and the argument remains self-contained without reducing the conclusion to a tautology or prior author result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal relies on standard bordism theory and properties of SL(2,Z) and other duality groups; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract. The refinement itself functions as an ad-hoc adjustment to the conjecture.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Bordisms can interpolate between 9d gauged supergravities with non-trivial SL(2,Z) bundles.
    Stated in the first sentence of the abstract as the setup for the study.
  • domain assumption Gravitational solitons realize monodromies via their topology.
    Abstract states this as one of the two mechanisms for implementing monodromies.
invented entities (1)
  • Refined Swampland Cobordism Conjecture for Ω1(BG) no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for suppression of bordisms when commutator width diverges by requiring infinite duality defects.
    Introduced in the abstract as the main proposal motivated by the soliton suppression observation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5774 in / 1633 out tokens · 50776 ms · 2026-05-19T15:32:48.243155+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Defects tied to discrete symmetries via bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG) and homology H_2(BG;Z) are codimension-two branes that participate in networks with junctions, expanding the Cobordism Conjecture's predictions in strin...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

240 extracted references · 240 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 97 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust and F. Quevedo,Strong - weak coupling duality and nonperturbative effects in string theory,Phys. Lett. B249(1990) 35

  2. [2]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Four Dimensional String Theory

    A. Sen,Strong - weak coupling duality in four-dimensional string theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9(1994) 3707 [hep-th/9402002]

  3. [3]

    Strong-Weak Coupling Duality in Three Dimensional String Theory

    A. Sen,Strong - weak coupling duality in three-dimensional string theory,Nucl. Phys. B434 (1995) 179 [hep-th/9408083]

  4. [5]

    String Theory Dynamics In Various Dimensions

    E. Witten,String theory dynamics in various dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B443(1995) 85 [hep-th/9503124]

  5. [6]

    P. K. Townsend,The eleven-dimensional supermembrane revisited,Phys. Lett. B350(1995) 184 [hep-th/9501068]

  6. [7]

    Heterotic and Type I String Dynamics from Eleven Dimensions

    P. Horava and E. Witten,Heterotic and type I string dynamics from eleven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B460(1996) 506 [hep-th/9510209]

  7. [8]

    Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity on a Manifold with Boundary

    P. Horava and E. Witten,Eleven-dimensional supergravity on a manifold with boundary,Nucl. Phys. B475(1996) 94 [hep-th/9603142]

  8. [9]

    Developments in Superstring Theory

    A. Sen,Developments in superstring theory, in29th International Conference on High-Energy Physics, pp. 371–381, 7, 1998,hep-ph/9810356

  9. [10]

    A Non-Supersymmetric Open String Theory and S-Duality

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel,A Nonsupersymmetric open string theory and S duality, Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 183 [hep-th/9701137]

  10. [11]

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes,Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string,Phys. Lett. B414(1997) 260 [hep-th/9707148]

  11. [12]

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes,Strong / weak coupling duality relations for nonsupersymmetric string theories,Nucl. Phys. B516(1998) 83 [hep-th/9707160]

  12. [13]

    Self-Dual Nonsupersymmetric Type II String Compactifications

    S. Kachru and E. Silverstein,Selfdual nonsupersymmetric type II string compactifications, JHEP11(1998) 001 [hep-th/9808056]

  13. [14]

    A Note on Orientifolds and Dualities of Type 0B String Theory

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Kumar,A Note on orientifolds and dualities of type 0B string theory, Phys. Lett. B464(1999) 46 [hep-th/9906234]

  14. [15]

    Dualities of Type 0 Strings

    O. Bergman and M. R. Gaberdiel,Dualities of type 0 strings,JHEP07(1999) 022 [hep-th/9906055]. – 69 –

  15. [16]

    Casimir Effect Between World-Branes in Heterotic M-Theory

    M. Fabinger and P. Horava,Casimir effect between world branes in heterotic M theory,Nucl. Phys. B580(2000) 243 [hep-th/0002073]

  16. [17]

    Charged and Uncharged D-branes in various String Theories

    E. Dudas, J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti,Charged and uncharged D-branes in various string theories,Nucl. Phys. B620(2002) 109 [hep-th/0107081]

  17. [18]

    Bossard, G

    G. Bossard, G. Casagrande and E. Dudas,Twisted orientifold planes and S-duality without supersymmetry,JHEP02(2025) 062 [2411.00955]

  18. [19]

    Fraiman and H

    B. Fraiman and H. Parra de Freitas,Symmetries and dualities in non-supersymmetric CHL strings,2511.01674

  19. [20]

    Z. K. Baykara, E. Dudas and C. Vafa,M-theory onS 1 ∨S 1 as Type 0A,2603.13468

  20. [21]

    Ho\v{r}ava-Witten theory on ${\mathbf{S}}^1\vee{\mathbf{S}}^1$ as type 0 orientifold

    C. Altavista, E. Anastasi, S. Raucci, A. M. Uranga and C. Wang,Hoˇ rava-Witten theory on S1 ∨S 1 as type 0 orientifold,2603.25786

  21. [22]

    Z. K. Baykara, M. Delgado, E. Dudas, H. P. De Freitas and C. Vafa,A Duality Web for Non-Supersymmetric Strings,2604.07433

  22. [23]

    The Anthropic Landscape of String Theory

    L. Susskind,The Anthropic landscape of string theory,hep-th/0302219

  23. [24]

    M. R. Douglas,The Statistics of string / M theory vacua,JHEP05(2003) 046 [hep-th/0303194]

  24. [25]

    The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua

    W. Taylor and Y.-N. Wang,The F-theory geometry with most flux vacua,JHEP12(2015) 164 [1511.03209]

  25. [26]

    Z. K. Baykara, A. Tomasiello and C. Vafa,Counting AdS Vacua,2512.04151

  26. [27]

    The String Landscape and the Swampland

    C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

  27. [28]

    T. D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa,The String Landscape, the Swampland, and the Missing Corner,PoSTASI2017(2017) 015 [1711.00864]

  28. [29]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti,The Swampland: Introduction and Review,Fortsch. Phys.67(2019) 1900037 [1903.06239]

  29. [30]

    van Beest, J

    M. van Beest, J. Calder´ on-Infante, D. Mirfendereski and I. Valenzuela,Lectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications,Phys. Rept.989(2022) 1 [2102.01111]

  30. [31]

    Gra˜ na and A

    M. Gra˜ na and A. Herr´ aez,The Swampland Conjectures: A Bridge from Quantum Gravity to Particle Physics,Universe7(2021) 273 [2107.00087]

  31. [32]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003 [2201.08380]

  32. [33]

    N. B. Agmon, A. Bedroya, M. J. Kang and C. Vafa,Lectures on the string landscape and the Swampland,2212.06187

  33. [34]

    Van Riet and G

    T. Van Riet and G. Zoccarato,Beginners lectures on flux compactifications and related Swampland topics,Phys. Rept.1049(2024) 1 [2305.01722]

  34. [35]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 084019 [1011.5120]

  35. [36]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199. – 70 –

  36. [37]

    Y. B. Zeldovich,A New Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Annihilation of Baryons, Phys. Lett. A59(1976) 254

  37. [38]

    Y. B. Zeldovich,A Novel Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Baryon Annihilation,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72(1977) 18

  38. [39]

    Banks and L

    T. Banks and L. J. Dixon,Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys.B307(1988) 93

  39. [40]

    GRAVITY AND GLOBAL SYMMETRIES

    R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, D. A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries, Phys.Rev.D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

  40. [41]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2007, 10.1017/CBO9780511618123

  41. [42]

    TASI Lectures on the Emergence of the Bulk in AdS/CFT

    D. Harlow,TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,PoSTASI2017 (2018) 002 [1802.01040]

  42. [43]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,1909.10355

  43. [44]

    S. B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 890

  44. [45]

    B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser,Duality in Calabi-Yau Moduli Space,Nucl. Phys. B338 (1990) 15

  45. [46]

    P. S. Aspinwall, B. R. Greene and D. R. Morrison,Multiple mirror manifolds and topology change in string theory,Phys. Lett. B303(1993) 249 [hep-th/9301043]

  46. [47]

    Phases of $N=2$ Theories In Two Dimensions

    E. Witten,Phases of N=2 theories in two-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B403(1993) 159 [hep-th/9301042]

  47. [48]

    Target Space Duality in String Theory

    A. Giveon, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici,Target space duality in string theory,Phys. Rept. 244(1994) 77 [hep-th/9401139]

  48. [49]

    Massless Black Holes and Conifolds in String Theory

    A. Strominger,Massless black holes and conifolds in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B451(1995) 96 [hep-th/9504090]

  49. [50]

    B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison and A. Strominger,Black hole condensation and the unification of string vacua,Nucl. Phys.B451(1995) 109 [hep-th/9504145]

  50. [51]

    Anti-de Sitter Space, Thermal Phase Transition, And Confinement In Gauge Theories

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

  51. [52]

    An M-theory Flop as a Large N Duality

    M. Atiyah, J. M. Maldacena and C. Vafa,An M theory flop as a large N duality,J. Math. Phys.42(2001) 3209 [hep-th/0011256]

  52. [53]

    B. R. Greene, K. Schalm and G. Shiu,Dynamical topology change in M theory,J. Math. Phys. 42(2001) 3171 [hep-th/0010207]

  53. [54]

    B. S. Acharya and S. Gukov,M theory and singularities of exceptional holonomy manifolds, Phys. Rept.392(2004) 121 [hep-th/0409191]

  54. [55]

    I. n. Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria and M. Montero,Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,JHEP08 (2019) 003 [1808.00009]

  55. [56]

    Demulder, D

    S. Demulder, D. Lust and T. Raml,Topology change and non-geometry at infinite distance, JHEP06(2024) 079 [2312.07674]. – 71 –

  56. [57]

    Hatcher,Algebraic topology

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

  57. [58]

    Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,

    M. Montero and C. Vafa,Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,JHEP01(2021) 063 [2008.11729]

  58. [59]

    Dierigl, J.J

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero and E. Torres,IIB string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 086015 [2212.05077]

  59. [60]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Branes, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 121601 [2303.17623]

  60. [61]

    Kaidi, Y

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,On non-supersymmetric heterotic branes,JHEP03 (2025) 211 [2411.04344]

  61. [62]

    Fukuda, S.K

    M. Fukuda, S. K. Kobayashi, K. Watanabe and K. Yonekura,Black p-branes in heterotic string theory,JHEP05(2025) 043 [2412.02277]

  62. [63]

    J. J. Heckman, J. McNamara, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Torres,GSO Defects: IIA/IIB Walls and the Surprisingly StableR7-Brane,2507.21210

  63. [64]

    Angius, J

    R. Angius, J. Calder´ on-Infante, M. Delgado, J. Huertas and A. M. Uranga,At the end of the world: Local Dynamical Cobordism,JHEP06(2022) 142 [2203.11240]

  64. [65]

    Witten,Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum,Nucl

    E. Witten,Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum,Nucl. Phys. B195(1982) 481

  65. [66]

    M. Dine, P. J. Fox and E. Gorbatov,Catastrophic decays of compactified space-times,JHEP 09(2004) 037 [hep-th/0405190]

  66. [67]

    G. T. Horowitz, J. Orgera and J. Polchinski,Nonperturbative Instability of AdS(5) x S**5/Z(k),Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 024004 [0709.4262]

  67. [68]

    Stretched extra dimensions and bubbles of nothing in a toy model landscape

    I.-S. Yang,Stretched extra dimensions and bubbles of nothing in a toy model landscape,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 125020 [0910.1397]

  68. [69]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and B. Shlaer,Bubbles of Nothing in Flux Compactifications,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 086015 [1002.4408]

  69. [70]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, H. S. Ramadhan and B. Shlaer,Decay of flux vacua to nothing,JCAP10 (2010) 029 [1009.0753]

  70. [71]

    A. R. Brown and A. Dahlen,Bubbles of Nothing and the Fastest Decay in the Landscape, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 043518 [1010.5240]

  71. [72]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, H. S. Ramadhan and B. Shlaer,Bubbles from Nothing,JCAP01(2012) 045 [1104.5229]

  72. [73]

    A. R. Brown and A. Dahlen,On ’nothing’ as an infinitely negatively curved spacetime,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 104026 [1111.0301]

  73. [74]

    Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario

    S. de Alwis, R. Gupta, E. Hatefi and F. Quevedo,Stability, Tunneling and Flux Changing de Sitter Transitions in the Large Volume String Scenario,JHEP11(2013) 179 [1308.1222]

  74. [75]

    A. R. Brown,Decay of hot Kaluza-Klein space,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 104017 [1408.5903]

  75. [76]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, B. Shlaer, K. Sousa and J. Urrestilla,Bubbles of Nothing and Supersymmetric Compactifications,JCAP10(2016) 002 [1606.03095]

  76. [77]

    New Kaluza-Klein Instantons and Decay of AdS Vacua

    H. Ooguri and L. Spodyneiko,New Kaluza-Klein instantons and the decay of AdS vacua, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 026016 [1703.03105]. – 72 –

  77. [78]

    Dibitetto, N

    G. Dibitetto, N. Petri and M. Schillo,Nothing really matters,JHEP08(2020) 040 [2002.01764]

  78. [80]

    Bomans, D

    P. Bomans, D. Cassani, G. Dibitetto and N. Petri,Bubble instability of mIIA onAdS 4 ×S 6, SciPost Phys.12(2022) 099 [2110.08276]

  79. [81]

    Draper, I

    P. Draper, I. G. Garcia and B. Lillard,Bubble of nothing decays of unstable theories,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L121701 [2105.08068]

  80. [82]

    Draper, I

    P. Draper, I. Garcia Garcia and B. Lillard,De Sitter decays to infinity,JHEP12(2021) 154 [2105.10507]

Showing first 80 references.