RECORD
Quivers via anomaly chains
High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 12 Apr 2003
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We introduce chains of generalized Konishi anomalies to write the quadratic and cubic equations that constrain the resolvents of general affine and non-affine quiver gauge theories, and give a procedure to calculate all higher-order relations.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We study quivers in the context of matrix models. We introduce chains of generalized Konishi anomalies to write the quadratic and cubic equations that constrain the resolvents of general affine and non-affine quiver gauge theories, and give a procedure to calculate all higher-order relations. For these theories we also evaluate, as functions of the resolvents, VEV's of chiral operators with two and four bifundamental insertions. As an example of the general procedure we explicitly consider the two simplest quivers A2 and A1(affine), obtaining in the first case a cubic algebraic curve, and for the affine theory the same equation as that of U(N) theories with adjoint matter, successfully reproducing the RG cascade result.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We study quivers in the context of matrix models. | background 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.03 | asserted 0.87 |
| s1 | We introduce chains of generalized Konishi anomalies to write the quadratic and cubic equations that constrain the resolvents of general affine and non-affine quiver gauge theories, and give a procedure to calculate all higher-order relations. | contribution 0.63 | 0.96 | 0.44 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | For these theories we also evaluate, as functions of the resolvents, VEV's of chiral operators with two and four bifundamental insertions. | contribution 0.56 | 0.94 | 0.08 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | As an example of the general procedure we explicitly consider the two simplest quivers A2 and A1(affine), obtaining in the first case a cubic algebraic curve, and for the affine theory the same equation as that of U(N) theories with adjoint matter, successfully reproducing the RG cascade result. | result 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.28 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We study quivers in the context of matrix models. We introduce chains of generalized Konishi anomalies to write the quadratic and cubic equations that constrain the resolvents of general affine and non-affine quiver gauge theories, and give a procedure to calculate all higher-order relations. For these theories we also evaluate, as functions of the resolvents, VEV's of chiral operators with two and four bifundamental insertions. As an example of the general procedure we explicitly consider the two simplest quivers A2 and A1(affine), obtaining in the first case a cubic algebraic curve, and for the affine theory the same equation as that of U(N) theories with adjoint matter, successfully reproducing the RG cascade result.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences
Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label
Builds on it 1 paper
-
With this modification the equations given in [ref] apply in our case as well.
N=1 Geometries via M-theory · Generalized anomaly equations for linear quivers · 0.91
Compares with it 1 paper
-
In the simplest case of two gauge groups we can be completely explicit: in this case ([ref]) reduces to [equation] Using ([ref]) and comparing with the explicit expressions for the quadratic and cubic constraints given in [ref] , we find g_N-1(v) = ∑_k=1,2f_k(v)=1/32π^2∑_k=1,2 ⟨TrW'_k(Φ_k)-W'_k(v)/v-Φ_k_k α_k^α⟩, g_2N-1(v) = f_2(v)(2W'_1/3+W'_2/3) - f_1(v)(W'_1/3+2W'_2/3)+g_1(v)+g_2(v), where [equation] [equation]
N=1 Geometries via M-theory · The $𝒩=1$ curve · 0.87
Cites it as background 1 paper
-
The list of papers which discuss subjects closely related to that of this subsection include [ref] .
Developments of theory of effective prepotential from extended Seiberg-Witten system and matrix models · $β$-ensemble of quiver matrix model and noncommutative curve · 1.00
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.